Apple can do that too:
Nothing. Apparently MS worked on an aqua-like theme, Apple experimented with a login screen similar to xp's.I don’t know what you are trying to say.
Well, would it be a fairer comparison to compare a gasoline engine with a diesel engine or two gasoline engines?That’s the point though as long as the benchmarks cover a wide range. If I test drive a car do I need to know how it is built “under the hood”.
How do you know the login screen is not the other way around
Well, would it be a fairer comparison to compare a gasoline engine with a diesel engine or two gasoline engines?
Well, would it be a fairer comparison to compare a gasoline engine with a diesel engine or two gasoline engines?
Looks like a mashup of Platinum, Aqua, and old-school Windows. I would feel so weird using that!
Then choose electric, it has its advantages and disadvantages like diesel and gasoline cars do. What matters is what you see as a worthy tradeoff.Doesn’t matter I want a car that is fast and fuel efficient. If electric is the best approach do that.
You make a good point. Like you said, its the criteria that matters. We can't always take apples and oranges comparisons at face value however, given the fact you can skew data to show any outcome we want. Additionally, I'd argue that by comparing two gasoline engines you aren't necessarily comparing two identical engines. One could be a four cylinder and one could be a six cylinder for instance. There needs to be a variable that stays the same (in this case engine type), otherwise the comparison will be skewed.I hate when people invoke the apples and oranges argument. For that argument to make sense you would have to be comparing two identical things and what would be the point of that? Where do you draw the line on what makes item A an apple and item B an orange? It's not the things that you're comparing that matters, but the criteria for which you find yourself comparing them in the first place. Would it be fairer to compare a diesel engine with a gasoline engine or two gasoline engines? That would depend on whether the criteria for the comparison is to determine whether there are any inherent advantages to running a diesel engine over a gasoline engine.
I used to theme Windows XP and 2003 all the time. There’s an actual Panther theme out there that makes it look almost exactly like Panther including the Apple logo.
The cancelled Windows “Neptune“ had this style of login screen as early as 1999.
Gallery - The Collection Book
thecollectionbook.info
Neptune wasn’t really a canceled project, it became Windows XP. The teams behind Neptune and odyssey combined and XP came out of that.The Neptune thing is convincing.
There's also a dark blue Royale called "Embedded" - not sure if that's what you meanThe only official MS ones I’ve seen is Royale. “Media Center Style” and Zune style. There’s also a dark Royale that I usually use.
It was supposed to be a home user version of Windows 2000 iirc - and that one was cancelled.Neptune wasn’t really a canceled project, it became Windows XP.
I forgot about that one. I’ve used that too though. I was referring to this one.There's also a dark blue Royale called "Embedded" - not sure if that's what you mean![]()
I’m not sure exactly.It was supposed to be a home user version of Windows 2000 iirc - and that one was cancelled.
ME is nothing more than a Windows 98 Third Edition - Neptune would have been NT-based yet tailored for the home user.ME was technically supposed to be the home version of 2000, and is actually newer than 2000 by 6 months.
I know that, however Microsoft literally marketed and sold it as the home edition to 2000. And it was released 6 months later.ME is nothing more than a Windows 98 Third Edition - Neptune would have been NT-based yet tailored for the home user.
Marketing != facts. But yeh, I had to tell people often enough that ME and 2000 were not the same or that it wasn't the successor.I know that, however Microsoft literally marketed and sold it as the home edition to 2000. And it was released 6 months later.
T4x Thinkpads come up every now and then but the p revisions are very sought after. Particularly the T42p, which I believe was the last fully IBM Thinkpad. The T43 had a bigger Lenovo input IIRR. I have been after a T42p for a while but sadly so are many others with deeper pockets.
Sadly I don't think there were any dual-processor LGA1155 boards,
The oldest machine I have that's still just about usable is a ThinkPad 600X from 1999, which was made in Scotland! It's covered in rubberised plastic and it feels like a tank.
ThinkPad 600s in 2004? 2004 was when my X40 (which has a Pentium M and 2GB of RAM) came out. Any idea why they gave you laptops of that vintage?In 2004 I was in Germany doing some process mapping using Visio. The company equipped us with Thinkpad 600Es with a mahoosive 128MB of RAM.
They (the company) were cheap. I was less chagrined by the antiquity than by the bare minimum of RAM they gave me. Constant freezing while Explorer and apps paged to disk. You typed a sentence then had to wait a few seconds for Windows to catch up. No fun.ThinkPad 600s in 2004? 2004 was when my X40 (which has a Pentium M and 2GB of RAM) came out. Any idea why they gave you laptops of that vintage?