http://www.macworld.com/article/268...fact-better-in-the-right-hands.html#tk.twt_mw
"Both phones appear to have the same 1GB of memory as last years devices. "
"Both phones appear to have the same 1GB of memory as last years devices. "
Which means iPhone 6 should perform better!
And I'm supposed to care, why? As long as it performs well then I don't give a **** about the numbers.
never had an issue with RAM...idc
not gonna deter me one bit
Which means iPhone 6 should perform better!
Yeah about that:
"As with the iPad Air and iPad mini with Retina display released last year, the iPhone 6 and iPhone 6 Plus are running the same processor, but at different clock speeds. Presumably, the clock-speed difference is tied into battery-life or heat concerns, or both. The iPhone 6s A8 processor runs at 1.2GHz, while the iPhone 6 Plus clocks in at 1.39GHz, according to GeekBench."
Image
Yeah about that:
"As with the iPad Air and iPad mini with Retina display released last year, the iPhone 6 and iPhone 6 Plus are running the same processor, but at different clock speeds. Presumably, the clock-speed difference is tied into battery-life or heat concerns, or both. The iPhone 6s A8 processor runs at 1.2GHz, while the iPhone 6 Plus clocks in at 1.39GHz, according to GeekBench."
Image
If I get either now I might get the iphone 6, I was really hoping for 2gb though. The only thing is reviewers are saying the battery on the 6 is just as good (one even said less) than the 5s, the 6+ on the other hand has a great battery.
I'll have to use them in person and browse to see if the RAM is an issue.
----------
Do you think these numbers are just fluff and have no actual impact on actual performance? You think a .2 ghz processor can perform as well as a 2ghz processor? It's just numbers right?
And I'm supposed to care, why?
You (and many others) will care once you get a future iOS update that makes the phone 6/6+ lag due to only have 1gb of RAM or worse yet... gets left for dead on updates by Apple earlier than if it simply had 2gb of RAM.
Depends on the software. I could develop a piece of software that will perform perfectly on a 1GHz processor and then I could also develop another piece of software that performs horribly on a 3GHz processor.
All I'm trying to say is that the numbers are not the whole story, and everybody freaking out, left, right, and centre about the 1GB RAM have no idea how it will actually perform. Apple wouldn't release a phone (don't quote me the first gen rMBP) that doesn't perform up to their high standards.
If RAM and processing power was all that mattered, why does the iPhone 5S still compete with some of those Android phones with insane processing speeds and RAM? Please don't quote me the highest benchmarks of each device and say: look this Android phone is better. What matters is SUSTAINED performance, which by and large the iPhone will almost always come out on top.
There are STILL complaints about jitteriness with Android, even with crazy spec'ed phones.
Do you want to know why?
The software is not optimized.
You (and many others) will care once you get a future iOS update that makes the phone 6/6+ lag due to only have 1gb of RAM or worse yet... gets left for dead on updates by Apple earlier than if it simply had 2gb of RAM.
It's not only the software. Look at an AMD cpu and an intel cpu and compare single core performance.
Furthermore I'm not even sure what the hell you mean earlier about writing something that performs fine on 1ghz then writing something that performs terribly on 3ghz, if you're intentionally sabotaging software maybe, but that's about the only damn way.
I have used the iPad air pretty extensively and I returned it. An apple device they released and it had constant tab refreshes and app purges because of the pitiful amount of RAM. I'm going to wait to see if this is the case with the new phones, if so I may just not upgrade, or go for a different phone.
I never said it was only the software. I said the numbers don't tell the whole story.
since macworld uk has 2GB maybe those sold in UK will have more ram.![]()
Which means iPhone 6 should perform better!
Yeah about that:
"As with the iPad Air and iPad mini with Retina display released last year, the iPhone 6 and iPhone 6 Plus are running the same processor, but at different clock speeds. Presumably, the clock-speed difference is tied into battery-life or heat concerns, or both. The iPhone 6s A8 processor runs at 1.2GHz, while the iPhone 6 Plus clocks in at 1.39GHz, according to GeekBench."
Image
As long as the phone works like it's supposed too I don't care
Obviously not but this is a pretty big difference here when standards for phones everywhere else are 2gb and above and you have a company like apple releasing their most expensive phones with only 1gb. Software optimization can only pick up the slack so much.
----------
Lol don't count on it friend, sorry.
iOS and Android are not even in the same league when it comes to software optimization. It's not even close.
Okay? and? I'm sorry but what android does or does not have doesn't excuse apple being exceptionally cheap and putting such a pathetically low amount of RAM into their phones to save 5 dollars a phone.