Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

dvrmstrng

macrumors 6502
Original poster
Mar 2, 2006
250
0
the only white iphone's in stock in any store within 50 miles of me are 2 32 gig versions 20 miles from here. For someone who wont use the iphone as a music player, is there any reason to spend the extra money for the 32 gig over the 16? The $100 is not really a problem, just wondering if it warrants it if i dont currently see myself using all that extra space.
 
I would go with the 32gig version. The key word for you is currently. Never bad to have extra space for who knows what in the next 12-24 months. Especially true if the 100$ isn't a big deal.
 
Get the 32Gb and fill it with useful ebooks. You can never have too many interesting things to read. Plus you won't need to worry about filling it with video or photos.
 
yeah i guess i might as well get the top of the line.

Well, take it from someone who owns the 32GB, it isn't a quality issue.
The 16GB is of the same built quality, therefor the 32GB isn't "top of the line", just different.

If you don't need the space on your phone, it is like buying high octane gasoline for your car when it doesn't require it.
It may may you feel good, but it is money wasted in the long run.
 
^ agree. I usually spring for the best but cnsidering my 100 gig music collection is too big to bring along anyway and I constantly sync my photos/videos to my computer, I considered 16gig saving $100. If you'll use the space though, get the 32.
 
1) Because some current apps (e.g. Navigon) and potentially some future app you've not even thought of may be >1 GB in size.
2) Because seldom has "damn, I just have too much space" ever been applied to anything.
3) Because that is what is available - deal with it.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.