There is a distinct lack of emdashes in the article, so I that's a testament it's come straight from the press release.
I ran your statement through 'Writing Tools' in (Apple) Notes, and the following are what I received:
Friendly:
“The article seems to have been straight from the press release, and it’s missing a lot of emdashes.”
Professional:
“The absence of emdashes in the article strongly suggests that it is directly derived from the press release.”
Concise:
“The article lacks emdashes, suggesting it’s a direct quote from the press release.”
Summary:
“The article lacks emdashes, indicating it is a press release.”
Key Points:
• Article Source: Press release.
• Article Characteristic: Lack of emdashes.
List:
* There is a distinct lack of emdashes in the article.
* This suggests that the article is a direct copy of a press release.
Table:
Compose (various selections, via ChatGPT):
“The absence of emdashes in the article strongly suggests a concerning lack of original reporting, implying it was copied directly from a press release.”
“It seems the article doesn’t have many emdashes, which might suggest it was based closely on the press release.”
“The article lacks em dashes, suggesting it came from a press release.”
I particularly enjoyed the latter "em dash" version, as it is precisely aligned--and better-suited--to accepted convention than the previous smashburger examples