What about if the iPad was paired with a wireless physical keyboard?
Do you really want that though? If you need a keyboard badly enough, I would say to just go with the macbook air. iPad apps aren't made to use keyboards, and their use is often really clunky.
What about if the iPad was paired with a wireless physical keyboard?
At home, I probably use iPad about 75% of the time and iPhone and Mac 10 to 15% each. But for typical work or school needs, the opposite would probably hold true.
I have to say that I disagree with almost this entire post.
There are more than a few instances where people (not just power users or whatever) might want this. For example lets say you are writing down notes in reference to a webpage or some other app, or a research paper. Being able to either quickly switch between, or have both displayed at once is a huge benefit.
It supports a huge number of gimped applications, it isn't really a good comparison. There are no full featured creation apps on the App Store. As clase as it gets really are the Pages/Numbers/Keynote apps from Apple and they still aren't that great. They all also suffer from the above limitation.
Again, simply document management says you are wrong. I have more than a few documents where I would want them available to multiple apps and currently there are nothing more than piss-poor workarounds for this. A document repository would be the best solution.
Right now laptops are incredibly overpowered for the tasks that they are performing, that isn't the case yet with the iPad. Laptops last a long time because they are so powerful and the tasks that people use them for don't really grow in regards to requirements. The same can not be said for the iPad. Many apps right now take full advantage of the iPad. That is great until the next iPad comes out and then those developers can finally add in this new feature and that new feature.
Nobody is waiting for the next better/faster laptop to incorporate new features because today's laptops are more than up to the task.
At home, I probably use iPad about 75% of the time and iPhone and Mac 10 to 15% each. But for typical work or school needs, the opposite would probably hold true.
and what do you do with the other 10-15%??![]()
The only really annoying "feature" for me on the iPad is the lack of a more computer-like file system.
That's your right, but I think you completely misunderstood it.
Yes, people might want it. However, the majority of people, regardless of their usage, don't. They couldn't care less. Trust me, I know a great number of those type of people. I'm the nerd, I use multi-tasking all the time on my computer. It's rare to find me without windows covering windows covering windows (well, or sorted out nicely into spaces, depending on what I'm doing). However, most people don't need that or care about it. Some percentage don't even want it, because it's simply too confusing. That's a small percentage, but the point is that even those who do need that aren't likely to be the majority. Not to suggest that no one needs it.
You seem to have a weird view of "full-featured". 100% of what probably 75% or more of people need to do with their computers, even when it comes to content creation, is possible on the iPad. Not even gimped. And remember, as I said, there are some things that are only on the iPad, or are better on the iPad. What if the content you're creating is art? Music? Sometimes, depending on the person, it's a vast improvement to use an iPad.
Also, remember that the debate here wasn't whether anyone needed more. It's whether it's enough for many people. And for many people, the iPad surpasses all their needs.
You need this. Most people don't care. They do what they need to do in the app they have for that, and they're good.
Just the mere fact that you point out that laptops are incredibly overpowered should be evidence of what we're talking about here. Most people will never need anything that can't be done on an iPad. Even if you think most is a stretch, surely half the population doesn't need anything more than an iPad?
75+12.5+12.5 = 100 (taking the averages of the 10-15% range he gave). Note he said iPhone and Mac each.
jW
I'd like to see an iPad with a tablet optimized OS X similar to what we're seeing with the upcoming Windows 8 tablets. (I know iOS is OS X-based, but to all intents and purposes it just isn't the same thing). I like the iPad fine the way it is now, but that's what it would take for me to even consider an iPad as a legitimate replacement for my laptop. People don't see the iPad as a Mac-tablet, they see them as bigger iPod's. Like samplane123 said, I'm sure tablets will become more commonplace in years to come and they certainly have what it takes to replace laptops for many consumers, but I doubt laptops will ever vanish in their place. It seems the way tablets are made now (with simple, smartphone-like operating systems) will only serve to differentiate tablets and laptops even more as two very different types of products. There will be tablets and there will be portable computers. Because so many people have smartphones now in days, I feel many people will still buy laptops for their mobile PC needs because their iPhone's/Android's can do nearly everything that their tablet counterparts can do.
iOS already kinda is a tablet optimized version of OSX. Having been built on top of the same Darwin core. Its current limitations only really exist because Apple purposely put them there.
I've never owned an iPad so excuse my ignorance...
I was with you until you said you can't really see music videos on youtube on it? Any particular reason why? Are they blocked for some reason? I don't really watch music videos anyway, but this caught my eye as strange.
I wonder how many generations until they update that. At some point I expect there to be an ipad option that can do updates, backups, and everything else without another computer. If it becomes a truly sovereign unit, you may see it gain further popularity. Apple probably has some idea when this will happen, but I doubt they have it nailed down to an exact year. It may take advances in non mechanical storage. NAND specifically has a lot of predicted issues going forward.
The file system has never been a more than a marginally "solution" to the problem. As far as the user perspective goes. Add a group of people working together and we start needing to invest productive time in "Managing Stuff for the Computer" not for our own ends. So as much as better document handling is high on list. I wouldn't want Finder, that would be the worst of both worlds. I want investment in something better than Finder and current Document Handling.