Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I'm so far unable to configure Optic ID, but I wear prescriptions. The Optic ID system might be unable to focus well enough on my retina. Custom Zeiss lenses will be arriving soon.
 
im wondering how we can have cameras on our phones...
Phones are thicker than the MacBook lid.
anyway, i have an imac and there is space behind camera to fit 10 of these components, but it still doesnt have faceid...
Might be a distance thing. Face ID doesnt work if you are too far away and iMacs on average might be far enough away sop Face ID wouldn't work reliably. Since Apple only uses one authentication method, they went with the more reliable one on the iMac.
 
Last edited:
That one boeing max model indeed has proven history of optimization and what has happened is resul of that and many other factors.
engines moved forward
software calculations based on using only sensors on one side of the aircrafts nose
no complete automation override
lack of educated and skilled people on both sides of the certification process
I agree with victorvictoria.
But this type of authentication can be turned off, I do not get the point of this good/bad debate on that.
Let me add to this! Read an amazing essay on what drove the path to that outcome:
IMG_1404.jpeg
From source over here: https://perell.com/essay/boeing-737-max/

TLDR; (butchering it): Basically the usual nonsense where corporate, bean counters and lawyers run the shop (instead of engineers or people capable in the specific domain) and absolutely zero risks nor innovation paths are taken because there’s no need. Pinching savings down to the penny and skimming on absolutely everything.

The same reasons why every new phone tends to feel like the previous one and no more Golden Gates bridges or Empire States or massive road infrastructures endeavors haven’t been built again… on that essay they mention how air travel totally stagnated and even went backwards regarding travel speed.

An amazing read.
 
Let me add to this! Read an amazing essay on what drove the path to that outcome:
View attachment 2345658
From source over here: https://perell.com/essay/boeing-737-max/

TLDR; (butchering it): Basically the usual nonsense where corporate, bean counters and lawyers run the shop (instead of engineers or people capable in the specific domain) and absolutely zero risks nor innovation paths are taken because there’s no need. Pinching savings down to the penny and skimming on absolutely everything.

The same reasons why every new phone tends to feel like the previous one and no more Golden Gates bridges or Empire States or massive road infrastructures endeavors haven’t been built again… on that essay they mention how air travel totally stagnated and even went backwards regarding travel speed.

An amazing read.


Not so sure about this source.

 
Dear Apple, bring optic ID to the iPhone and kill the notch.
And while they're at it, they should do the same with maybe initially Face ID for the next MacBooks, iMac, and at least maybe the Pro Display

Don't get me wrong, having Touch ID for the keyboards is nice now, but even after washing my hands after they get dirty, I find that the Magic Keyboard's Touch ID sensor is quite picky compared to my only other device that still has Touch ID (6th gen iPad mini)
 
  • Like
Reactions: tasa
Never understood if these methods are so secure that you need to enter the passcode for anything other than failed unlocks.
The PIN is always more important than the biometric. It is also predictable; it is either right or wrong, and never 85% right. The PIN doesn't slowly change over time like your face of fingers or eyes, with the last 8 slowly fading into a 9. Every biometric unlock has the real possibility that the backing biometrics template could be altered.

That predictability means they can use it to generate the hardware unlock key. Every function (including the ability to change your biometric) is under the PIN.

The idea of mandating a biometric and not allowing PIN is something third party developers can do - it doesn't really make sense IMHO except edge cases like the PIN being socially engineered and phone stolen. I suspect it is actually a regulatory fall-out.
 
im wondering how we can have cameras on our phones...
FaceID requires more equipment than a camera. Even with just a front-facing camera, laptops have significantly lower quality cameras because of the lid thickness vs the thickness of an iphone.

anyway, i have an imac and there is space behind camera to fit 10 of these components, but it still doesnt have faceid...
Honestly, probably a business decision - because if it was on iMac, people would complain that much more about why it isn't on the MacBooks.
 
Apple's authentication tech is the industry standard. Touch ID, Face ID and now Optic ID all set the bar that competitors reach for.

I'm not up to speed on the very latest tech from the likes of Samsung and Google, but their past versions were not certified for making payments, for example. I think they've addressed that now.
Iris scanning technology is very mature. John Daugman developed useful and secure algorithms already three decades ago. They have been used for census purposes in large parts of the world (billions of people).

There is no reason why smart phones could not use iris recognition. Fingerprints and facial features (latter being much more complicated technologically) just seem to be more convenient.

So, I fail to keep this very innovative despite Apple’s marketing blurb.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ToyoCorollaGR
Never understood if these methods are so secure that you need to enter the passcode for anything other than failed unlocks.
I have to enter the passcode after every guest user. It’s annoying. But you can actually touch the floating touchpad and that’s pretty cool.
 
Lasers beaming right into your retinas. What could go wrong? You'd be crazy not to try it!

Safe. So was the Boeing Max 737, until it wasn't. I'll let you be the guinea pig, thanks!
You’re really scare of this or you joking?
 
Phones are thicker than the MacBook lid.

Might be a distance thing. Face ID doesnt work if you are too far away and iMacs on average might be far enough away sop Face ID wouldn't work reliably. Since Apple only uses one authentication method, they went with the more reliable one on the iMac.
My example with cameras, was that cameras are bulky devices, but they miniaturized them to fit in phones. FaceID was engineered to fit in a phone, but no one forbids apple to make imac and macbook version too. It's not an unique device that got a form and will keep it to the end of days.

As above, if it doesnt work too far away, make it to work far away. And if apple uses one authentication method, well, make 2 methods instead. few weeks ago i was setup an android phone for my mum (switched back again after having an iphone)... 300€, faceid + touch id. felt like being in middle ages with my iphone 🤦‍♂️
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Surf Monkey
FaceID requires more equipment than a camera. Even with just a front-facing camera, laptops have significantly lower quality cameras because of the lid thickness vs the thickness of an iphone.


Honestly, probably a business decision - because if it was on iMac, people would complain that much more about why it isn't on the MacBooks.

Well i'm still complaining about not having a backlit keyboard, which macbooks has... and please dont say anything about battery! i would prefer recharge it every week, instead of every 2 months, than turning on the light to see it in the dark.
 
My example with cameras, was that cameras are bulky devices, but they miniaturized them to fit in phones. FaceID was engineered to fit in a phone, but no one forbids apple to make imac and macbook version too. It's not an unique device that got a form and will keep it to the end of days.

As above, if it doesnt work too far away, make it to work far away. And if apple uses one authentication method, well, make 2 methods instead. few weeks ago i was setup an android phone for my mum (switched back again after having an iphone)... 300€, faceid + touch id. felt like being in middle ages with my iphone 🤦‍♂️
Of course they could at some point, but currently the Face ID array components are too thick for the MacBooks. Not sure why it isn’t in the iMac, unless Apple just thinks that Touch ID on the keyboard is better.
 

Well i'm still complaining about not having a backlit keyboard, which macbooks has... and please dont say anything about battery! i would prefer recharge it every week, instead of every 2 months, than turning on the light to see it in the dark.
Indeed; Apple has enough margins on those keyboards (especially the TouchID keyboard) that they should probably just add a few models with even more features.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.