Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

AppleGoat

macrumors 6502a
Original poster
Lately, I've gotten back into chess. Given how CPU-intensive Chess is and how much of a sweat my machine works up -- is the challenge of the game in proportion to the speed of the processor? Say, you had two machines, one with a Core2Duo and another with the latest Hawell quad-core, would the computer with the Haswell chip offer a more challenging game of chess?
 
Lately, I've gotten back into chess. Given how CPU-intensive Chess is and how much of a sweat my machine works up -- is the challenge of the game in proportion to the speed of the processor? Say, you had two machines, one with a Core2Duo and another with the latest Hawell quad-core, would the computer with the Haswell chip offer a more challenging game of chess?

In theory. In practice it's likely that the algorithm in that chess implementation is going to be the limiting factor.
 
I'm sure the challenge the same. A faster CPU will just allow the computer take less time to decide on its move.
 
I'm sure the challenge the same. A faster CPU will just allow the computer take less time to decide on its move.

Theoretically playing tight time limits with a slower chip might limit the computer's ability to explore trees, but I don't think it's going to be a real issue.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.