PCMag has declared OS X Leopard the victor in this years OS war comparison which included Windows XP, Vista, and Ubuntu:
http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2273486,00.asp
http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2273486,00.asp
the review said:The Ubuntu core, however, is a text-based OS—something Windows spent years getting away from. And unfortunately, you still have to use terminal input to install software or configure settings far too often, even more often than you had to use DOS command lines in Windows 3.1. Until Ubuntu can do away with the terminal for all but the most geeky uses (as the Unix-based Mac OS does), it will never become an OS for the masses.
Ubuntu's biggest flaws, in my opinion, are...
1. Too much reliance on the Terminal (you can use OS X without it; completely the opposite w/U)
2. Lack of a truly attractive GUI (built-in, from the start, no Beryl/Compuwhatever.)
If they fixed these two, the OS would be much more appealing to Windows users (who, let's face it, are the people they're trying to convert). The first issue is a bigger deal than the second, but the second is still relevant. Basically, they need to go a lot further in simplifying the downing and installation of applications. When they get to the point where 99% of apps can be processed the way you do so on Windows or on OS X, people will truly be able to just download a disk, burn it, and install the OS. Until then, it'll remain something you need tech support for, which limits its marketability.
This is exactly what I wrote a few weeks ago in the MBP forum. Someone else stated Ubuntu didn't require Terminal use, but anyone who's spent more than 5 minutes setting up Ubuntu will testify otherwise;
lol, I don't think so. running ubuntu for more than 5 minutes will require users to use some sort of terminal?
...
hardware: ubuntu 2.5/5, OSX 3.5/5, does Ubuntu run on more hardwares than OSX or not?
They called Safari a bad browser. Wtf... I love Safari? I downloaded it for Windows!
I didn't understand this, either. I mean, for someone who likes Firefox or Opera a lot, it may not be their, but it's certainly better than IE...
With Apple, users pay every year (or so) to get a major upgrade. Microsoft provides its major Windows upgrades, called Service Packs, free of charge. Paying more for Mac OS upgrades is a bit galling when you've already paid a premium for the hardware.
Not only is there already a thread on this article over in the MacBytes forum, but it's now three pages of mostly browser infighting.
Not only is there already a thread on this article over in the MacBytes forum, but it's now three pages of mostly browser infighting.