Yes, he's gonna have to pay tax on all of that... 10,000 songs ($9,900) + 10 iPods ($4,490) + an iMac ($2,000? I am guessing) = roughly $17,000, so his tax bite could be a few thousand dollars. Then again, I think I read that he's a minor (17 years old?), so his prize value may be added to his PARENTS' income and they'll have to factor that into their income tax.FearFactor47 said:So, would, say, the guy who won the Billion iTunes song have to pay tax on all the iPods he won?
Can someone explain the difference between tax in the UK and US? Here (UK) it's simply VAT added to things you purchase (at 17.5%).
KingSleaze said:Last year, I won a car. GM 'Hot Button' promotion. Hey, great, I got a new car.
I had to pay state sales tax to be able to pick it up. $4000.
I got a tax statement from GM. The car is valued at $21,644 worth of income to me (and that much of a write-off for them).
I've got to pay roughly additional $8000 to federal and state income tax, because no money was withheld in the claiming of the prize.
That car made up about 1/3 of my income for last year. Pity, I can't claim it's a gift and that GM actually made more money off of giving me the car as part of the contest promotion.
Sucks to win a car. (BTW, actual retail price is higher than what GM is dunning me for, fair market value, blah, blah, blah)
So, sure. Tax those 'gift' bags.
Doctor Q said:Since I didn't get a definitive answer to my post earlier about whether cash could be added to the gift bags to cover the taxes, I called a CPA and asked.
The answer is that corporations can, and indeed do, add cash to an amount paid to an individual to cover taxes on that amount. It is sometimes called "grossing it up", because it raises the gross amount paid to reach a certain net amount after taxes.
If you want to pay somebody in the 30% marginal tax bracket enough to cover the taxes on $100,000, you must add 100000x0.3 + 100000x0.3^2 + 100000x0.3^3 + ..., which is an infinite sum if not rounded off at each term. It converges to base_amount / ( 1/taxrate - 1 ), or in this case 100000 / ( 1/0.3 - 1 ) = 100000 / ( 3.3333 - 1 ) = 100000 / 2.3333 = $42,857.76, the same number I computed earlier.
So now we know. And I can sleep peacefully tonight.
Kingsly said:Here's an insane and outrageous concept: Give the multi-million dollar stars a ticket to Uganda
Not greed - it's to stop the greedy. Otherwise payment in-kind would rule the roost. "We will pay you $50 Mr. Cassidy, that way you will owe no taxes. As a benefit, we will give you this $500,000 home." Come Christmas "There are no bonuses this year, but everybody should enter our one card monty game, where everybody who guesses right gets a free car!"QCassidy352 said:🙁 There's no limit to the government's greed. If they can tax it, they will tax it.
QCassidy352 said:🙁 There's no limit to the government's greed. If they can tax it, they will tax it.
edesignuk said:I just love the fact that people who can afford to pay for stuff, never actually have to.
It's the same with big execs of companies, they get massive pay packets and bonuses, then the company pays for everything anyway.
Great 🙄
too bad the guy who fixes cameras for big movies doesn't get a gift bag.......quigleybc said:If people keep pirating movies, then next year the bag might only be worth $50,000....now that would be a crime...😱
It was the lack of representation part that got everyone pissed off, not the tax itself. Read a damn history book.hookahco said:To US residents-
Remember when we were reading about how a general name George Washington led a revolution against King George II of England because he was taxing the residents of the American Colonies at an exteremely high rate? It was 2%.
They were furious about having to give 2% of their income to a government. Now, we pay up to 40%. American government- have fun trying to find my cash.