Become a MacRumors Supporter for $25/year with no ads, private forums, and more!

Shockre

macrumors member
Original poster
Apr 4, 2009
52
0
I've just installed 10.9 on a separate partition to test it and saw this! Hope it stays like that in final version!
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2013-06-11 at 22.40.50.png
    Screen Shot 2013-06-11 at 22.40.50.png
    104.4 KB · Views: 678

tgi

macrumors 65816
Aug 29, 2012
1,321
318
I've just installed 10.9 on a separate partition to test it and saw this! Hope it stays like that in final version!

Wow that's cool, have you confirmed any performance gains?
 
Comment

derohan

macrumors member
Jul 28, 2012
70
13
Nice, France
I've just installed 10.9 on a separate partition to test it and saw this! Hope it stays like that in final version!

I confirm - Happened earlier today to me too, running at 1024, but I haven't done any benchmarks - Might be worth comparing graphic benchmarks from this DP1 build to (hopefully soonish) the GM release, I wonder how that will compare :D
 
Comment

filmbuff

macrumors 6502a
Jan 5, 2011
906
281
Is that just a glitch or did it really give you that much graphics memory? That would nearly triple the currently available amount.
 
Comment

derohan

macrumors member
Jul 28, 2012
70
13
Nice, France
Is that just a glitch or did it really give you that much graphics memory? That would nearly triple the currently available amount.

My 2012 air is giving me 512 with 10.8.4, and 1024 with the 10.9 DP1


What's the standard graphics memory for the 2011 air?
Does it change depending on RAM config?
 
Comment

filmbuff

macrumors 6502a
Jan 5, 2011
906
281
My 2012 air is giving me 512 with 10.8.4, and 1024 with the 10.9 DP1


What's the standard graphics memory for the 2011 air?
Does it change depending on RAM config?

My bad, I forgot that all new Macbook Airs got 512mb in one of the last updates. It used to be 384mb if you had 4GB of RAM.

Does this mean that laptops with 8GB of RAM will get 2G of graphics memory? There must be a point where extra memory can't make up for the slowness of the HD4000.

Would still like to see some benchmarks that prove this isn't just a typo.
 
Comment

derohan

macrumors member
Jul 28, 2012
70
13
Nice, France
My bad, I forgot that all new Macbook Airs got 512mb in one of the last updates. It used to be 384mb if you had 4GB of RAM.

Does this mean that laptops with 8GB of RAM will get 2G of graphics memory? There must be a point where extra memory can't make up for the slowness of the HD4000.

Would still like to see some benchmarks that prove this isn't just a typo.

I've got the 8GB of RAM ^^ - But not twice the VRAM :(
 
Comment

cluthz

macrumors 68040
Jun 15, 2004
3,118
3
Norway
My bad, I forgot that all new Macbook Airs got 512mb in one of the last updates. It used to be 384mb if you had 4GB of RAM.

Does this mean that laptops with 8GB of RAM will get 2G of graphics memory? There must be a point where extra memory can't make up for the slowness of the HD4000.

Would still like to see some benchmarks that prove this isn't just a typo.

To be honest, the HD4000 hardly benefits going from 256 to 512.
This is done with a GT330M:
http://barefeats.com/mbpp22.html

The GT330M is quite a bit faster. Only with the 2560x1600 tests you could see any difference. Gaming on anything higher than 1440x900 is just madness on the intel hd :)
 
Comment
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.