Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

dwrufus53

macrumors 6502a
Original poster
I've had Arlo cameras for the past 5-6 years. But they're getting a bit long in the tooth, and to be honest, Arlo's software leaves a lot to be desired. One of the recent updates has completely borked the setup, and destroyed all of my geofencing and schedules. So I've decided that it's time for a change.

I'm looking for something that is at least compatible with HomeKit, and would prefer subscription-free. Looking for recommendations.
 
If you want to upgrade to a more advanced system, you can install IP cameras (I use Dahua 8MP cameras) with SecuritySpy. I don't know if integration with HomeKit is enough for you... but it's definitely a more ‘serious’ system.

The load on a basic Mac mini M4 is very low (4 cameras)


 
Last edited:
There are several good options for the Home App that also work and play well with other systems in case you change you mind someday.

I've been using the Aqara G5 Pro for the past year outside and the night vision is awesome. It comes in 2 colors plus there is a WiFi and POE version. (Subscription free in the Apple Home App)
 
As an Amazon Associate, MacRumors earns a commission from qualifying purchases made through links in this post.
  • Like
Reactions: almostinsane
theres always the ubiquiti UNVR. local 24/7 recording and Homekit integration built in.

if you step down to the NVR-Instant, you can integrate into homekit via HA or homebridge
 
agreed. get an NVR with POE cameras and bring them into Apple Home via Homebridge or Scrypted.

i personally have a ubiquiti setup so it obviously made sense for me to use Unifi Protect and their POE cameras. setting up Homebridge has been pretty easy and now i have access to those cameras + doorbell into Apple Home.
 
I've had Arlo cameras for the past 5-6 years. But they're getting a bit long in the tooth, and to be honest, Arlo's software leaves a lot to be desired. One of the recent updates has completely borked the setup, and destroyed all of my geofencing and schedules. So I've decided that it's time for a change.

I'm looking for something that is at least compatible with HomeKit, and would prefer subscription-free. Looking for recommendations.

I'm in the EXACT same position! My Arlo cameras are also getting old and I haven't upgrading as I refuse to move to their subscription based system.
I've been contemplating a wired NVR system. As much as I dislike the wiring, I dislike missing some of the video capture even more - the delay between sensing motion and actually capturing video. I want a 24/7 recording system for the outside of the house, with remote live view and playback abilities at the very least......
 
I'm in the EXACT same position! My Arlo cameras are also getting old and I haven't upgrading as I refuse to move to their subscription based system.
I've been contemplating a wired NVR system. As much as I dislike the wiring, I dislike missing some of the video capture even more - the delay between sensing motion and actually capturing video. I want a 24/7 recording system for the outside of the house, with remote live view and playback abilities at the very least......
Not to mention, its trivial for someone to disable/disrupt wifi these days. Cameras on wifi is not the best option for securing your home or ensuring reliability.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ifti
Not to mention, its trivial for someone to disable/disrupt wifi these days. Cameras on wifi is not the best option for securing your home or ensuring reliability.

There is virtually no difference in crime prevention between a wifi and poe camera. It's easy to compare because there is virtually no crime prevention with cameras period. They might deter the opportunist from stealing your Amazon shipment of toilet paper on your porch occasionally but not much more than that. Hardened entryways and sirens are statistically better deterrents.

Wifi jammer? 😂 Serious criminals are brazen enough they might not even wear a balaclava and they'll use the sound of police sirens as an indicator that it's time to leave. If you have Oceans Eleven in your bushes with an RF jammer they will also have a method of defeating a POE camera, breaking down the door, opening the safe, etc....

I'm assuming it's ok for me to share these videos since the cops gave up and there are no suspects. I'm going to set them to unlisted on YouTube.... They are recordings of a video from a computer screen so I apologize for that.

I was doing some contracting work for a business and these are two videos from their POE cameras of a 3 guys stealing a couple hundred thousand dollars in cars.

They clearly didn't bother to prepare too much since their mask barely cover their faces. The silent alarm was triggered as soon as they entered the building directly calling the police. And they literally used that brand new BMW X5 to smash through the locked chain link gate.....



Cars were recovered but no arrest, police said "They are probably underage anyway". 🙄

Regardless I don't think they cared if the cameras were wifi or POE....

If you want a deterrent that is actually proactive and might prevent a crime get a German Shepherd or Rottweiler. This is serious threat escalation for any would-be ne'er-do-wells. Staring down 80 lbs of muscle and teeth imparts visceral response of fear and dread faster than you can figure out if the dog is friendly or not. It's just primal instinct everyone has built in....(check local laws first)

As a side note, first place a thief will check for valuables is the master bedroom closet. The last place they will look is the kitchen pantry and under bathroom/kitchen sinks. Master bedroom closet is literally the worst place though, might as well set the stuff by the front door so they don't track dirt on the floors.
 
There is virtually no difference in crime prevention between a wifi and poe camera. It's easy to compare because there is virtually no crime prevention with cameras period. They might deter the opportunist from stealing your Amazon shipment of toilet paper on your porch occasionally but not much more than that. Hardened entryways and sirens are statistically better deterrents.
They certainly don't prevent theft, but (and this happened to me two days ago at four in the morning) they can alert you to an intruder, call the police, and catch the guy (an asylum seeker). As for poe/wifi... nothing beats a cable.
 
They certainly don't prevent theft, but (and this happened to me two days ago at four in the morning) they can alert you to an intruder, call the police, and catch the guy (an asylum seeker). As for poe/wifi... nothing beats a cable.
Oh no doubt. I. may have been heavy handed in my wording. I think some cameras are better than no cameras. There are times where it will send the opportunist on to someone elses house. However in a break in by the time you get the notification and process what is going on they are likely on their way out.

And saying that I feel POE cameras are better since you CAN get them with higher quality video output (higher bitrate, resolution, dynamic range, night vision).

However that said, I wouldn't put all your faith in them. Calling the police is definitely the right thing to do but also having a siren is good to have. It has a psychological effect. and depending on where you live can alert neighbors and people passing by.

I haven't really looked into it but there is. likely a way to set up a siren activation prompt with a short cut on motion detection (I wouldn't want this automatic).
 
  • Like
Reactions: Wolf1701
I haven't really looked into it but there is. likely a way to set up a siren activation prompt with a short cut on motion detection (I wouldn't want this automatic).
I hesitate too. I could set off an external alarm, and the program that controls everything now has 99% accuracy... but false alarms can happen. Since it's protection for my home, the alarm sounds inside and wakes me up, and then I assess the situation. I can usually get rid of some of the scum by alerting the police.

There is a certain satisfaction in seeing them in handcuffs, though.
 
the fact is wired cameras produce higher quality, lower latency video, are much more reliable and versus wifi, in a ton of different scenarios. ask anyone with a wifi camera.

and yes, theft is getting more and more high tech, whether it is affecting your part of the world or not. with a $50 gadget wifi can easily be jammed, and a car can be relay attacked and stolen right from the drive.

you can pretend that doesnt happen, but it most certainly does, every day.
 
There is virtually no difference in crime prevention between a wifi and poe camera. It's easy to compare because there is virtually no crime prevention with cameras period. They might deter the opportunist from stealing your Amazon shipment of toilet paper on your porch occasionally but not much more than that. Hardened entryways and sirens are statistically better deterrents.

I suppose it really depends on what type of Wi-Fi camera we are talking about. True that most thief's aren't going to jam Wi-Fi- then again thief's are getting more sophisticated (i.e. flipper zeros and stealing cars), I guess it depends on the sophistication of criminal.

Here are my biggest problems with Wi-Fi Cameras
1) They're usually battery powered which is inconvenient. Who really wants to be on a ladder in the middle of winter taking down a camera to charge it, then putting it back up (or swapping the battery).
2) Many of these consumer-oriented Wi-Fi cameras rely on the internet. No internet (whether that's jamming, power outage, ISP problem, etc)
3) Along those lines, if most of these cameras require a subscription to retain footage, even if they do offer local storage
4) Bad for live viewing - latency is usually significant and live view duration usually times out relatively quickly to preserve battery, which drains quickly when used to view live footage
5) Most of these cameras are awful quality- high resolution means little if the low light performance is garbage. These often use small sensors,
6) ONVIF capable, good-high quality, Wi-Fi enabled cameras are rare, especially if you prefer to buy from a reputable brand that's not a Chinese brand (Dahua, Hikvision - they make 80%+ of ONVIF cameras, under many names) and takes security seriously. Those that exist still require a power source, in which case you should probably just run the ethernet.

------

if you want good quality, reputable cameras that work with the standard ONVIF protocol look at Axis, Avigilon, Hanwha / Wisenet, Vivotek, Mobotix, Pelco, Speco, Arecont, etc. Be warned, they cost a lot more. Hanwha Wisenet (formerly Samsung) probably offers the best value for money. If your VMS software (SecuritySpy evidently does) or NVR has the ability for server/NVR side AI detection, don't worry about finding cameras with that function.

The one thing to be warned about with a lot of VMS software and NVRs is that remote access is not always the most convenient... port forwarding is not secure, UPnP isn't great, a lack of static IP can be a problem. Manually connecting to a VPN might be tolerable to view footage but won't help you with alerts. Tailscale doesn't necessarily work with all ISPs. Getting your system to work the way you want may require a lot of workarounds.

The best solution is VMS software or NVR that uses a remote server they operate for access to your local network. Professional VMS software (not Blue Iris or SecuritySpy) offer this this means paying for software with pricey licensure which is often $100+/camera per year. I use Axis Camera Station Pro but that's probably not what you're looking for. Hanwha Wisenet Wave VMS software I believe is about $80 per camera, is perpetual licensing, no special licensing for non-Wisenet cameras... well liked pro software. You don't need a super computer to run the server software. 8th gen intel i5 is probably more than enough.

The best options I've come across for most consumers/prosumers are Unifi Protect and Synology Surveillance Station. UniFi software doesn't require licensing and their NVRs are cheap (but I suggest models with the 3.5" HDD), but their cameras are overpriced and not great quality IMO. The software has become very impressive. While UniFi can use ONVIF cameras... not really, don't bother. Synology is designed to work with ONVIF cameras, is $40-50 license per camera + Synology DiskStation cost (includes 2 licenses unless or VMA series NVR which includes 8?)... just be aware they've made radical changes to their policies and feature compatibility. It will cost more upfront on the recorder end but you'll probablty save money overall by being able to buy cheaper cameras vs UniFi.
 
  • Like
Reactions: srl7741
Developer of SecuritySpy here. Just to chime in on a few of the points made above:

It's true that port forwarding makes your system available to the public Internet, and it's reasonable to worry about this. SecuritySpy makes this as safe as possible: clients are automatically blocked after a few failed login requests, and we use a custom web server with no server-side scripting or known vulnerabilities to exploit.

The alternative is a virtual network like Tailscale or ZeroTier - these are considered more secure because only pre-authorised members can even attempt connections. These do work with most Internet connections, and they work well. You can just keep them running all the time on your devices, and benefit from seamless, secure connections.

A.Goldberg makes a good point about remote access convenience. Our rationale for not implementing proxy servers for remote access is that this requires expensive server infrastructure, and we would have to pass on the costs to users in the form of subscriptions. It's a selling point of SecuritySpy that your data is completely under your own control - local analytics, local recording, direct web/app access (where port forwarding is possible).

SecuritySpy is subscription-free. Every purchase comes with an initial 2-year support period that offers continued free updates and access to technical help. Renewal is optional - the software will continue to work fully whether you renew or not.

We always recommend wired PoE cameras to our customers, especially for outdoor use where WiFi signal is often poor due to relatively thick external walls. Even indoors where the signal might be good, wired cameras are so much better in terms of reliability and performance, and they also won't slow down your WiFi network for other devices with their constant video streaming.

SecuritySpy supports both HomeKit and Home Assistant in terms of events (e.g. turning on a light when motion is detected, or triggering recording when a home motion/window/door sensor is triggered), though not for video streaming.

Both motion-triggered and continuous 24/7 capture are supported by SecuritySpy, all recorded to local storage and accessible within the macOS application, via the web interface, or from the iPhone / iPad / Apple TV / Android apps.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Wolf1701
Developer of SecuritySpy here. Just to chime in on a few of the points made above:

It's true that port forwarding makes your system available to the public Internet, and it's reasonable to worry about this. SecuritySpy makes this as safe as possible: clients are automatically blocked after a few failed login requests, and we use a custom web server with no server-side scripting or known vulnerabilities to exploit.

The alternative is a virtual network like Tailscale or ZeroTier - these are considered more secure because only pre-authorised members can even attempt connections. These do work with most Internet connections, and they work well. You can just keep them running all the time on your devices, and benefit from seamless, secure connections.

A.Goldberg makes a good point about remote access convenience. Our rationale for not implementing proxy servers for remote access is that this requires expensive server infrastructure, and we would have to pass on the costs to users in the form of subscriptions. It's a selling point of SecuritySpy that your data is completely under your own control - local analytics, local recording, direct web/app access (where port forwarding is possible).

SecuritySpy is subscription-free. Every purchase comes with an initial 2-year support period that offers continued free updates and access to technical help. Renewal is optional - the software will continue to work fully whether you renew or not.

We always recommend wired PoE cameras to our customers, especially for outdoor use where WiFi signal is often poor due to relatively thick external walls. Even indoors where the signal might be good, wired cameras are so much better in terms of reliability and performance, and they also won't slow down your WiFi network for other devices with their constant video streaming.

SecuritySpy supports both HomeKit and Home Assistant in terms of events (e.g. turning on a light when motion is detected, or triggering recording when a home motion/window/door sensor is triggered), though not for video streaming.

Both motion-triggered and continuous 24/7 capture are supported by SecuritySpy, all recorded to local storage and accessible within the macOS application, via the web interface, or from the iPhone / iPad / Apple TV / Android apps.

Thank you for your response. It's great to hear the input of developers (or the owner, perhaps). I've had interest in SecuritySpy for probably 10 years+ but I have never given it a shot. I've always thought the stability of Macs would be great for cctv. I appreciate the fact you guys are taking advantage of the Apple Silicon GPU power to integrate AI object detection, that's very convenient and adds a lot of value.

I understand your argument about port forwarding and the sensible consideration and recommendations. I still don't think it's ideal. I would also add list implementing VLANs, changing default ports, whitelist IPs or at least geoblocking. Tailscale, Wireguard, ZeroTier, etc would be the better solution.

For remote/mobile push notifications without Port Forwarding, VPN setup or tunnel service, etc the easiest solution is probably Pushover which offers email to push notifications on iOS and Android. As I recall it supports image attachments too, so if you can configure email alerts from the VMS/NVR with an image attachment, you can at least have a preview of what your camera is seeing. The one caveat is finding an email with SMTP that won't delay or eventually block the emails. Pushover does have an API, if SecuritySpy can support that it's direct communication but adding alert images this way would require scripting, not really my expertise.

I have no concept of the cost and effector to develop, deploy, and maintain a remote access system. I also know nothing of your user base or your company''s size/resources. But strictly form a user standpoint I think it's a service a lot of people would be willing to pay for out of simplicity. Many pay $10-20 per month for Ring/Nest/Blink/Wyze (the prices keep increasing... and all have major limitations). Assuming it's practically feasible, if you offered an annual add-on remote access service, explaining to customers the benefits, why it costs extra, and that it's not mandatory (and old methods will work), I think people would but pat for it. I would pay extra for that. Or offer it standard and build the cost into support extension fees if it's not a dramatic cost. Apple users already pay a premium and value things that just work. Just my $0.02.

RE: SSpy subscription costs... technically that is true. But as I understand your licensing terms you get 2 years of "support" with a license purchase- which includes technical assistance and updates. I do think it's important to highlight that in order to continue support/updates past 2 years SSpy requires an annual fee of 20%*** (***based on 3 year renewal- I did not catch that after the first two glances) of the full licensing cost prior to the renewal date or 75% after. This isn't super apparent on the website unless you actually read the TaC or google the licensing model. (I would make that fine print more visible).

To be clear, I'm not criticizing your pricing model - every product puts costs in different places. Besides, probably the most similar software Blue Iris has a very similar licensing model. I like to calculate such costs on 5yr term- average home user has 4-8 cameras, so using SecuritySpy (2yr license +3yr renewal price) is $200-$400/5yrs ($40-$80/yr... a lot cheaper than Ring, definitely cheaper than most pro VMS, this excludes the Mac cost of course). It's also the only legitimate Mac VMS I'm aware of, at least that has a long track record. Blue Iris is $300/5yr w/updates (+PC) + $10 mobile app licenses. UniFi Protect has no licensing costs, the UNVR/UNVRi only costs $200-300 (+ HDD/s) but their proprietary cameras cost 2x+ more than they probably should and many of their models have atrocious image quality especially in low light and darkness.

Some questions for you, if you don't mind
1) Can SecuritySpy send HTTP Webhooks/commands natively? MQTT?
2) In what format is the video footage saved locally? Is it proprietary or is it compressed into a common video format?
3) How does a late model Intel Mac handle Security Spy AI detection vs a new low end Apple Silicon Mac (Mini)?
4) Are cameras that use HTTPS compatible? (I forget if AxisOS 12 cameras are HTTPS by default now or HTTPS only)
4) Do you have any feature roadmap for SSpy you are able to share? Any expansion of additional AI related features?

Anyways, I'd love to give SecuritySpy a trial one of these days. I have an application where SSpy might actually be a decent fit. My newest Mac, by that I mean 7-8 years old, is a 2018 MBP 15" that I'll be replacing one of these days - it's probably not the ideal Mac for this use. I'd prefer to do a test on my new Mac (14" MBP) to get a more accurate experience of its capabilities. In actual use I'd probably buy a Mini for SSpy.
 
Thank you for your response. It's great to hear the input of developers (or the owner, perhaps). I've had interest in SecuritySpy for probably 10 years+ but I have never given it a shot. I've always thought the stability of Macs would be great for cctv. I appreciate the fact you guys are taking advantage of the Apple Silicon GPU power to integrate AI object detection, that's very convenient and adds a lot of value.

I understand your argument about port forwarding and the sensible consideration and recommendations. I still don't think it's ideal. I would also add list implementing VLANs, changing default ports, whitelist IPs or at least geoblocking. Tailscale, Wireguard, ZeroTier, etc would be the better solution.

For remote/mobile push notifications without Port Forwarding, VPN setup or tunnel service, etc the easiest solution is probably Pushover which offers email to push notifications on iOS and Android. As I recall it supports image attachments too, so if you can configure email alerts from the VMS/NVR with an image attachment, you can at least have a preview of what your camera is seeing. The one caveat is finding an email with SMTP that won't delay or eventually block the emails. Pushover does have an API, if SecuritySpy can support that it's direct communication but adding alert images this way would require scripting, not really my expertise.

I have no concept of the cost and effector to develop, deploy, and maintain a remote access system. I also know nothing of your user base or your company''s size/resources. But strictly form a user standpoint I think it's a service a lot of people would be willing to pay for out of simplicity. Many pay $10-20 per month for Ring/Nest/Blink/Wyze (the prices keep increasing... and all have major limitations). Assuming it's practically feasible, if you offered an annual add-on remote access service, explaining to customers the benefits, why it costs extra, and that it's not mandatory (and old methods will work), I think people would but pat for it. I would pay extra for that. Or offer it standard and build the cost into support extension fees if it's not a dramatic cost. Apple users already pay a premium and value things that just work. Just my $0.02.

RE: SSpy subscription costs... technically that is true. But as I understand your licensing terms you get 2 years of "support" with a license purchase- which includes technical assistance and updates. I do think it's important to highlight that in order to continue support/updates past 2 years SSpy requires an annual fee of 20%*** (***based on 3 year renewal- I did not catch that after the first two glances) of the full licensing cost prior to the renewal date or 75% after. This isn't super apparent on the website unless you actually read the TaC or google the licensing model. (I would make that fine print more visible).

To be clear, I'm not criticizing your pricing model - every product puts costs in different places. Besides, probably the most similar software Blue Iris has a very similar licensing model. I like to calculate such costs on 5yr term- average home user has 4-8 cameras, so using SecuritySpy (2yr license +3yr renewal price) is $200-$400/5yrs ($40-$80/yr... a lot cheaper than Ring, definitely cheaper than most pro VMS, this excludes the Mac cost of course). It's also the only legitimate Mac VMS I'm aware of, at least that has a long track record. Blue Iris is $300/5yr w/updates (+PC) + $10 mobile app licenses. UniFi Protect has no licensing costs, the UNVR/UNVRi only costs $200-300 (+ HDD/s) but their proprietary cameras cost 2x+ more than they probably should and many of their models have atrocious image quality especially in low light and darkness.

Some questions for you, if you don't mind
1) Can SecuritySpy send HTTP Webhooks/commands natively? MQTT?
2) In what format is the video footage saved locally? Is it proprietary or is it compressed into a common video format?
3) How does a late model Intel Mac handle Security Spy AI detection vs a new low end Apple Silicon Mac (Mini)?
4) Are cameras that use HTTPS compatible? (I forget if AxisOS 12 cameras are HTTPS by default now or HTTPS only)
4) Do you have any feature roadmap for SSpy you are able to share? Any expansion of additional AI related features?

Anyways, I'd love to give SecuritySpy a trial one of these days. I have an application where SSpy might actually be a decent fit. My newest Mac, by that I mean 7-8 years old, is a 2018 MBP 15" that I'll be replacing one of these days - it's probably not the ideal Mac for this use. I'd prefer to do a test on my new Mac (14" MBP) to get a more accurate experience of its capabilities. In actual use I'd probably buy a Mini for SSpy.

Thank you for your thoughtful reply.

Your points about remote access methods are well taken. For port forwarding, I think geoblocking is a great idea - if you don't mind we're going to steal that and add it as an option 🙂 While not a perfect solution in itself, it adds another layer of protection.

Renewal feels - yes it's a bit cheaper if you renew for 3 years at once, but 1y and 2y renewals are also available and the yearly cost isn't too different (e.g. for an 8-camera license, it's about $12/y difference between renewing in 1y vs. 3y increments - full details can be found by clicking the Terms & Conditions link via our store).

To answer your specific questions:

1. Yes, you can set up custom HTTP commands for each camera that are then easily available to invoke. MQTT is not currently not supported, but there is built-in support for both Apple Home and Home Assistant home automation systems.

2. Video footage is stored in standard .mov or .mp4 movie containers - widely compatible.

3. Recent Intel Macs can do a lot of the work in the GPU so they perform quite well, but any Apple Silicon Mac offers a huge speed boost over even the fastest Intel Mac for AI tasks. I've just benchmarked a 2017 iMac we have here, which should be similar to your MBP, and it can process AI motion detection at a rate that would support over 20 cameras (for comparison, a basic M1 is about 10x faster at running this neural network model).

4. Yes, SecuritySpy has full support for SSL connections to cameras.

5. We don't publish feature roadmaps - this generally has only downside for us, as it can lead to user disappointment if promised features don't materialise for whatever reason. But if there are some specific features that you have in mind, we are always open to suggestions!
 
Thank you for your thoughtful reply.

Your points about remote access methods are well taken. For port forwarding, I think geoblocking is a great idea - if you don't mind we're going to steal that and add it as an option 🙂 While not a perfect solution in itself, it adds another layer of protection.

Renewal feels - yes it's a bit cheaper if you renew for 3 years at once, but 1y and 2y renewals are also available and the yearly cost isn't too different (e.g. for an 8-camera license, it's about $12/y difference between renewing in 1y vs. 3y increments - full details can be found by clicking the Terms & Conditions link via our store).

To answer your specific questions:

1. Yes, you can set up custom HTTP commands for each camera that are then easily available to invoke. MQTT is not currently not supported, but there is built-in support for both Apple Home and Home Assistant home automation systems.

2. Video footage is stored in standard .mov or .mp4 movie containers - widely compatible.

3. Recent Intel Macs can do a lot of the work in the GPU so they perform quite well, but any Apple Silicon Mac offers a huge speed boost over even the fastest Intel Mac for AI tasks. I've just benchmarked a 2017 iMac we have here, which should be similar to your MBP, and it can process AI motion detection at a rate that would support over 20 cameras (for comparison, a basic M1 is about 10x faster at running this neural network model).

4. Yes, SecuritySpy has full support for SSL connections to cameras.

5. We don't publish feature roadmaps - this generally has only downside for us, as it can lead to user disappointment if promised features don't materialise for whatever reason. But if there are some specific features that you have in mind, we are always open to suggestions!

Thanks for your response, that's helpful information. Glad you like that idea.

So practical purposes, is there a benefit to using Apple Silicon over Intel <20 cameras... I know there's a lot of factors that that affect performance here. Let's say for the sake of argument 8 cameras @5MP.

I get your position on roadmaps. Overpromising and underdelivering is a reliable way of frustrating your customers. I might have some ideas in mind but out of respect to you and your company I’ll wait until after I trial the software. I’d happy to provide feedback and potential suggestions and appreciate the openness.

If it’s okay with you I might send you PM with further questions in the coming customer. I have only skimmed your documentation briefly so I will read through your guides more closely before asking questions you might already have answered.

I appreciate the chat and look forward to trying SecuritySpy. Thanks!
 
Thanks for your response, that's helpful information. Glad you like that idea.

So practical purposes, is there a benefit to using Apple Silicon over Intel <20 cameras... I know there's a lot of factors that that affect performance here. Let's say for the sake of argument 8 cameras @5MP.

I get your position on roadmaps. Overpromising and underdelivering is a reliable way of frustrating your customers. I might have some ideas in mind but out of respect to you and your company I’ll wait until after I trial the software. I’d happy to provide feedback and potential suggestions and appreciate the openness.

If it’s okay with you I might send you PM with further questions in the coming customer. I have only skimmed your documentation briefly so I will read through your guides more closely before asking questions you might already have answered.

I appreciate the chat and look forward to trying SecuritySpy. Thanks!
For something like 8 cameras @5MP and moderate frame rates (like 10-15fps), a 2018 Mac will be able to cope with this fairly easily, so not too much advantage with Apple Silicon apart from lower power usage and more headroom for any spikes in resource usage (e.g. a bunch of people log on to the web interface and start viewing cameras at the same time).

Sure, feel free to contact us directly with any further questions - see contact us.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.