That's neat! Since it's an optical cable, can't it package in a flat cable?
There's copper in there, too: you can't transmit power over light.
That's neat! Since it's an optical cable, can't it package in a flat cable?
I think the link is wrong; it links toThe release presents a more affordable alternative to Apple's 3-meter Thunderbolt 4 cable, which is priced at $159. Like Apple's offering, the OWC cables feature a braided nylon covering for durability and flexibility.
https://www.apple.com/shop/product/MW5H3AM/A/thunderbolt-4-usbhttps://www.apple.com/shop/product/MW5H3AM/A/thunderbolt-4-usb
when it shouldn't have that second link embedded in itIf Thunderbolt 5 gets the kinks out in 2025, now that Apple offers it and Intel is close, not sure it's a good buy unless one needs it now.People here are complaining about the cost but fail to mention how crazy fast these things are. If you need 40 Gbps chances are that you have the money for them. And look how complicated they are. You are combining copper cable with optical which means you have to have optical to electrical signal conversion at each end.
They already have. Here's a link to OWC's page for Thunderbolt 5 cables. Roughly $20 0.3 meter, $28 0.8 meter and $35 1 meter.I would expect them to bring out a Thunderbolt 5 cable now. Why, aren't they doing that?
Apple has one also https://www.apple.com/shop/product/MC9C4AM/A/thunderbolt-5-usb‑c-pro-cable-1-mI would expect them to bring out a Thunderbolt 5 cable now. Why, aren't they doing that?
There's copper in there, too: you can't transmit power over light.
Still overpriced, costs a lot less €€€ on AliExpress, they work fine.