sleep issue? in what consist the sleep issue?
Sleep is a feature that i use a lot in my MBP and i dont want to loose it.
ah ok... so its an hibernation problem.
Thanks for the explanation![]()
I have the 120GB OWC SSD, loving it so far, this thing is so fast!
I have firmware 343 and the sleep issue is present. Hopefully OWC can release the Mac OSX update soon.
OWC Grant states that only 10% of the OWC SSD users are experiencing this. (You can find it on their blog)
So rightly so that some people aren't experiencing this but I want to know more into the statistics of his statement.
10% of OWC SSD users are non-portable users?
Is it a hardware problem then? A different batch of SF1200 chips perhaps? Because if it's firmware, shouldn't everyone be experiencing the issue?
The 10% seems perfectly reasonable to me. In any case you can't go by the forums at all as an indicator. For the most part, only people with problems tend to engage in discussion about it, and for the other it's likely the case that the vast majority of OWC customers are not even members or active posters of MacRumors (most people I know with Macs don't even visit).That 10% he throws out is nowhere near accurate IMO. There have got to be many users like me. I bought a OWC SSD and put it in a 2008 MBP and have the sleep bug. I read in the forums here and on the OWC website that it was a known issue and they were working on a firmware fix, so I just disabled auto sleep and happily used my SSD while I waited for the fix. The forums here have many people just like me that never called OWC as it would not help to call. Those users are not included in the 10%. That said, for 10% of users to have a critical bug like this in a product is a lot.
The 10% seems perfectly reasonable to me. In any case you can't go by the forums at all as an indicator. For the most part, only people with problems tend to engage in discussion about it, and for the other it's likely the case that the vast majority of OWC customers are not even members or active posters of MacRumors (most people I know with Macs don't even visit).
I am one of those with FW 343 and have never had an issue.
I think you missed my point. OWC is saying 10% have contacted them with a problem. I am saying the number is higher because some users do not call to report the problem. We can argue about how many users that is, but it makes the actual problem more than 10% in any event.
What product of any kind can you think of it would be okay to have 10% that don't work properly? This is after multiple firmware updates still.
They did not say (in the blog) 10% of users contacted them. They said, "this issue only affected around 10% of all our SSD customers." That's two different things. Your assertion that it is greater than 10% has no basis in fact.
Obviously, not! They can estimate it. There is a whole field of study for that: statistics & probability. I'll bet you they are not determining that 10% by the actual number of customer calls. It wouldn't be very accurate. In any case, they did not claim their figure base on calls. You did.Where do you think they got the 10% number from? You think they just made it up? It is obviously from reported problems and just as obviously does not include people who never reported a problem.It really is not hard to understand.
Obviously, not! They can estimate it. There is a whole field of study for that: statistics & probability. I'll bet you they are not determining that 10% by the actual number of customer calls. It wouldn't be very accurate. In any case, they did not claim their figure base on calls. You did.
right back at you for making assumptions with no basis.
Point taken. As I said in my original post, this is just my opinion. I guess I am just bothered by a vendor that would continue to sell a product knowing it won't work for 10% of their customers.
Now they (OWC) have pulled a OCZ style switch by moving from 34nm to 25nm NAND but keeping the same product name. Very disconcerting.