Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Originally posted by Xero
whats the speed of your system? this is probably why your seeing lag in the dock. you do have a point tho; this dynamic stuff would probably take a butt-load of processing power

I'n using a DP 867 with 1024 MB of RAM. Often, using the dock is pretty smooth, but if I move too quickly back and forth a couple times trying to remember what app I wanted (the processor speed of my brain could use some work too ;) ), then it will hesitate just long enough to sometimes screw me up.
 
Re: Re: Combine 'piles' with database file system

Originally posted by eric_n_dfw
I think you meant BeOS who has this database file system. No?

(BTW, it was NeXTSTEP and OPENSTEP - not NeXt OS :) )

(And to be even more geeky - OPENSTEP was NeXT's implementation of OpenStep :eek: )

Yeah that's what happens when you're trying to get a post in in between real work... well I stand corrected ;-p thanks.

Some times it's obviously better to remain vague and let those whoe know what you're talking about fill in the proper nouns..
 
Re: Same type of idea running on XP/2K

Originally posted by Luigi
Check this site www.scopeware.com

Same type of idea of "piling" documents on top of each other.

Photo here
http://www.scopeware.com/products/prod_v_individuals.html


Pretty cool, I look forward to using in on a MAC.

Lou G.

Sort of but not really. What you need to imagine is a dozen or so folders all stacked right on top of eachother. When you click on it then drag away they expand one by one until you get to the one you want and you release to select that one.
 
Originally posted by BillyShears
I'm not sure I understand this.

What is the benefit to this, as opposed to a folder with thumbnails turned on?

Maybe this is something (as others suggested) that needs to be seen.

From what I understand of its possible implementations, you can have the finder Re-sort the piles by different criteria if you wish. Such as a pile of documents for this weeks work, then last weeks or :resort: piles of documents by document type... the jpeg pile, the text pile, the screen snapshot pile.

Of course you could sort everything manually into folders, but people don't work that way.

As I write this, I have probably over a hundred icons on my desktop (thank goodness I can make them small in os X) Sometimes I sort by date to find something, other times, I sort by type, or name. But this could probably be reduced to Four or Five piles of icons.

In a way, it is sort of like labels... you could probably save a custom search as a pile description.
 
Piles - MS Binder Killer?

Piles sound interesting as a concept, and two different possible metaphors come to my mind.

1) When I think of piles, I think of an entity where order is important. I think that piles could be a modified package that maintained the order of the documents. Something similar to what Microsoft tried to do with Binder, but a the system level. Perhaps as a generic filetype, which would allow you to mix and match your Word, HTML, JPEG, OmniGraffle, Keynote and other documents into one coherent, ordered package (like a report). With OS support, and a standard API, we could even have neat things like headers and footers that worked across documents, and the ability to print the entire pile at once. You could even drag files around after you "spread" the pile to reorder them (e.g. move chapters around) and possibly have some smart files like tables of context, and indexing based on the OSX search/indexing service. Piles could contain sub-piles, and even folders.

2) As an interface for live queries. A kind of views interface, that was readily distinguished from folders to eliminate confusion from people who don't understand how the same file can be in 4 different places.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.