Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I disagree on the VMWare. TERRIBLE customer support...virtually non-existent.
Your experience is the exception not the rule. I've opened up a number of tickets through out the years of owning VMware Fusion, and everyone was addressed within hours and many were solved at that point as well.

I have received consistent and knowledgeable support from them. Also reading on other boards, is that my experience is not unusual, its the typical one.

I'm sorry to hear that you had an awful time.
 
does anyone know how i can remove a virtual drive, like "uninstall it"

hehe thanks
 
Your experience is the exception not the rule. I've opened up a number of tickets through out the years of owning VMware Fusion, and everyone was addressed within hours and many were solved at that point as well.

I have received consistent and knowledgeable support from them. Also reading on other boards, is that my experience is not unusual, its the typical one.

I'm sorry to hear that you had an awful time.

Agreed. I've only ever had excellent support and service from VMware.

Currently using Fusion 3.1.2 and it's definitely the best for me...
 
I hate VMWare Fusion. I installed it on my original Macbook.

TERRIBLE customer support. Complete disdain for their customers. They ignore all emails and phone calls.

VMWare Fusion is the WORST. Do not buy it.

I think you might have gotten a mislabeled product because that's what Parallels' #1 complaint across the Interwebs is - support. VMWare, being a much larger and more established company, has the boards, email, and phone, and diligent folks have had no problems getting support.

OP: Having used them all in various versions over the years I can tell you this with confidence.

Parallels - The fastest of the three, bar none, seemingly designed from the ground up to be the best Mac OS virtualization experience. Best migration tool of the three, supports swipe gestures. More flexibility for memory allocation. HOWEVER, it is extremely unstable. VMs that corrupt themselves over time, snapshots that get corrupted and hose the VM, VM sizing issues, plus not every OS is supported. Parallels support is nonexistent.

VirtualBox - Obviously the cost advantage (free), and better support for non-Windows environments. Smallest overall footprint. Issue here is compatibility. Does not support popular gestures. Small customer base means it's not easy to share with others as they're likely using one of the other two. Does not hold up well when run for the long term.

VMWare Fusion - The pioneers of virtualization and the gold standard in business applications means more money in the coffers for support and updates. Cautious about how they deploy fixes and patches. Supports a wide variety of operating systems including full server support. VMs are interoperable with Windows with no file conversion necessary. Problem with VMWare Fusion is that they are not nearly as up-to-date as their other products and don't seem to care to be. Drivers still don't support the latest Windows technologies properly. Aero hogs the VM's resources severely, unlike Parallels which seems to run it just fine (this is a graphics card driver issue). Does not support swipe gestures for zooming and other things.


Of the three I prefer VMWare, simply for the interoperability. I get VMs shared from various places and it's nice to be able to plug-and-play rather than have to do conversions and all that. Additionally, VMWare seems to work the best with the various flavors of Windows as hosts, which is the only other OS I use.

If you're using non-Windows OS, you'd probably have a better experience on VirtualBox.

Personal experiences.
 
I run most of my VM's on an ESX box, but for those that I run locally, I use Virtualbox. Having ran Fusion from 1.x to 3.x, Virtualbox seems more stable and faster too. Fusion 3 was really bad, both in terms of stability and speed. I also got tired of their "Play games on Windows within a VM!" BS, because it's simply not true. I smart enough to know that that's a "too good to be true" statement anyway, but it's simply false advertising. When you can't even run a 5 year old game successfully, it's pretty much irrelevant.
 
One comment not covered unless I missed it -- Parallels has a 14 day free trial and VMware Fusion has a 30 day free trial. This gives anyone choosing among them the opportunity to try each of the three before settling on the one best for their needs.

People's experiences still matter, I don't say this to indicate that this discussion is unwarranted. Just a reminder that the free trials are available.
 
Agreed. I've only ever had excellent support and service from VMware.

Currently using Fusion 3.1.2 and it's definitely the best for me...
x2 on VMware. It is the most stable, mature, and robust choice.

I don't have the time to deal with errors and corruption that you get with the others.
 
Is VirtualBox like Boot Camp (must choose to boot either to OS X or Windows) or can you run it like VM Ware Fusion (Run Windows alongside OS X)? I have Boot Camp now but I'd format my partition and reinstall Windows if Virtual Box is like VM :D
 
Is VirtualBox like Boot Camp (must choose to boot either to OS X or Windows) or can you run it like VM Ware Fusion (Run Windows alongside OS X)? I have Boot Camp now but I'd format my partition and reinstall Windows if Virtual Box is like VM :D

Anyone heard if VMware is going to keep making Fusion, and if they are going to release a Fusion 4.0? My 3.1.2 is buggy and extremely slow. I'm teetering on switching back to Parallels. Also it won't run Win 2008 R2 it blue screens at launch, anyone else have any luck with Win 7 x64 or 2008 R2?
 
I've been using Parallels since like version 3 or 4 through 5 and now 6 and have never really had any issues with stability or performance. I use a Windows XP VM on a Gen-1 MBP with a 1.83Ghz Core Duo with 2GB of RAM, with no real issues.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.