Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Parallels is changing from virtualizing x86 to virtualizing ARM. You might be able to virtualize Windows on ARM that way, and it might even emulate x86 apps inside, but I wouldn't bet on it.

VMware has made some "nothing to announce at this time" remark somewhere.

We'll see.

Since Windows 10 2004 is a KVM friendly OS now. I guess it will just like virtualizing a Linux client for them.
And they can use their current DirectX on Metal driver in ARM client.

I will predict there's 99% chance they will announce windows arm support when Apple release the Apple Silicon Mac.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dabotsonline
Not sure why they have released it yet, Parallels 16 is beta quality software.

I tried it this morning on the latest macOS 11 dev beta and it wasn't great, I had to restart after installing it for some reason (which suggests they are still using kexts) and it even had weird UI glitches when changing dropdowns in the VM settings.

Whereas VMware Fusion Tech Preview works flawlessly and doesn't have any of those issues.
 
Do you want new features or not? Do you think these features magically appear, or do you developers need to code them and that these developers want salaries?

If you want something cheaper, take look at VirtualBox. It's really really bad compared to Parallels.
Parallels is a luxury alternative. It's the best but also expensive.

That was sarcasm.
 
Not sure where you're getting your information? I just installed Parallels 16 on my Mac running Big Sur beta 4. It is happily running Windows 10 (2004). Haven't tested exhaustively but it sure seems to be working just fine.

Are you replying to the wrong person?
 
I don't get why people are complaining about upgrading to newest version? I'm still using version 12 on Catalina and it works great.
 
I haven’t got any value out of this software in years. I hate they now make me pay for the annual service rather than just per OS upgrade change. Bored.
 
In a nutshell,

I've long been curious about Parallels.

Can anyone tell me how it works vs Bootcamp.

Most of native performance?

Can you work via 'coherence' to use your 'Windows' apps via the Mac dock?

If I have Bootcamp set up...can Parallels access my Windows apps whilst I'm still in the Mac?

GPU performance decent..?

VM vs. running directly on the hardware (Bootcamp), there's a decent speed improvement for the latter, but that's more critical for CPU/GPU intensive apps (design, CAD, games).

When you're in Bootcamp, well, you're running fully dedicated Windows machine, no access to MacOS services (I still don't even think access to the APFS filesystem ...). So if you prefer your primary computing platform to be MacOS, and want access to all those services/resources, a VM is the way to go. Otherwise you might have to use cloud storage, a common browser platform (or a bookmark sync solution, etc.), think if it like two physical computers that can't run at the same time (so if you find yourself in need of something on the Mac, it's a reboot ...)

Coherence mode removes the Windows OS window (that normally constrains apps running in the VM), and let's them float in their own native Windows window :D, if they're minimized, they're down on the Dock, there's a popout Start Menu available in MacOS, it's pretty well integrated - it's the mode I use 99% of the time, as I like have the couple of Windows apps I use across multiple displays, co-minlged with Mac apps (productivity [mail, calendar, Chrome], development [XCode, Postman], etc.).

VMs also have the advantage of just being a large file sitting on your MacOS (they run fine on a [fast] external drive as well). That means, they're easily backed up, restored/recovered from the Mac.


This question:

If I have Bootcamp set up...can Parallels access my Windows apps whilst I'm still in the Mac?

Not 100% clear on what you're asking, but I'll point out a few things:

Bootcamp is some support files and a dedicated drive partition, so when it fires up, it has its own allocated space, runs totally self-contained.

A Parallels VM is the app running plus a file that contains both the "machine" configuration and a virtual HDD (that's also accessible even when its not running).

Finally, you can virtualize your Bootcamp partition - so when creating the virtual machine in Parallels, you point it to a Bootcamp partition - what this allows for is running Windows both in a VM (where it operates just like any non-bootcamp VM instance) or, rebooting into a Bootcamp where it operates exactly like a standalone Windows machine.

GPU performance has continuously increased, but I'd assume still less than "native-esque" in Bootcamp, but I don't do anything GPU intensive, so don't have a good answer :)
 
The financials of a company that mostly makes money from hardware (Apple) are quite different than one that makes it from software (Parallels).

Personally, I think it'd be fairer if Apple charged for software.
Jeez. This again.
Apple have inflated the price of the hardware to account for the cost of the software. They already charge you for software.
It. Is. Not. Free.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rgbrock1
Users with Parallels Desktop 14 and 15 (including Pro and Business Editions) can upgrade for $49.99

Actually, the Pro version is an annual subscription and includes updates at no additional cost. I believe the business version is the same, but no personal experience there.


I have the Pro version, and of course I'm not thrilled by the annual fee, but I feel like I'm getting my money's worth. They were having a 20% off sale when I purchased at least. I'm running Windows 10 in a 16gb VM on a 2018 i7 Mini with 64gb RAM and it has truly exceeded my expectations. Much faster than my 2012 HP desktop PC with a dual-core i5 and I have not seen any crashes or other problems yet in almost 2 months of heavy use. Also running MacOS Sierra and Mountain Lion in VM's which let me continue using over $3000 worth of legacy software (VectorWorks, FileMaker Pro, Strata 3d).

So Parallels has enabled me to retire my 2012 Mini, 2013 MacBook Air and HP Windows PC. And the performance of my legacy Windows GIS application (GlobalMapper) is so good that I decided against upgrading that, which saves about $500 more.

I realize there are other solutions, and understand that Parallels may not always be the right choice, but it's working very well for me.
 
stupid question but can you install a copy of Big Sur as a VM using this? even if your macbook is no longer supported by Big Sur? or is this only to get Windows on your mac

I downloaded Parallels 16 this morning and one of the first things I did was create a Big Sur public beta VM in it.
I allocated 8GB RAM and 256GB SSD storage to Big Sur and it ran like molasses in the Arctic. I might try to tweak some other settings but initially I am not impressed. Then again, Big Sur is still beta.
 
Finally, you can virtualize your Bootcamp partition - so when creating the virtual machine in Parallels, you point it to a Bootcamp partition - what this allows for is running Windows both in a VM (where it operates just like any non-bootcamp VM instance) or, rebooting into a Bootcamp where it operates exactly like a standalone Windows machine.

I'm currently running Windows in Parallels for the nice integration with MacOS. But I used Windows XP with BootCamp on a 2008 MacBook Pro many years ago. Thought it would be handy to also use it through Parallels, as you describe. That worked fine BUT Windows saw this as a different computer that I needed to register and activate. Finally, I got rid of Bootcamp, only used Windows with Parallels and transferred my Windows license to the virtual machine.

Has this changed? Doesn't Microsoft still consider a virtual machine a separate computer that needs its own license for Windows?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: D.T.
I downloaded Parallels 16 this morning and one of the first things I did was create a Big Sur public beta VM in it.
I allocated 8GB RAM and 256GB SSD storage to Big Sur and it ran like molasses in the Arctic. I might try to tweak some other settings but initially I am not impressed. Then again, Big Sur is still beta.

i tried it all day but I can’t get it to complete the installation. The UI loads fine but then it gets stuck at 1 minute remaining forever during the installation (with still 2/3 of the loading bar to finish)
 
I was able to get macOS11 installed and although it does show that Parallel's Tools are installed (and even tried reinstalling), it's not fully going full screen and still feels kinda wonky. My other VM's all work great so far, though. Although it's only been a few hours lol. Time will tell, but starting up a VM does seem a little faster? Maybe I'm just assuming it will be and my mind's thinking it is.

Ditto: no full screen with macOS 11. I too tried reinstalling Parallel Tools, to no avail.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gank41
i tried it all day but I can’t get it to complete the installation. The UI loads fine but then it gets stuck at 1 minute remaining forever during the installation (with still 2/3 of the loading bar to finish)

Did you allow Parallels to create an .iso of the macOS Big Sur installer? If so, delete that .iso and re-create using Parallels on the Big Sur installer.
 
I'm currently running Windows in Parallels for the nice integration with MacOS. But I used Windows XP with BootCamp on a 2008 MacBook Pro many years ago. Thought it would be handy to also use it through Parallels, as you describe. That worked fine BUT Windows saw this as a different computer that I needed to register and activate. Finally, I got rid of Bootcamp, only used Windows with Parallels and transferred my Windows license to the virtual machine.

Has this changed? Doesn't Microsoft still consider a virtual machine a separate computer that needs its own license for Windows?

That's a good point, I think it may depend on the licensing model, but you are correct, I did have to do a reactivation a few times (when going from BC to VM), but fortunately my use model was BC for a long cycle, then a VM. I eventually moved totally off of BC, went with a big nasty Windows notebook for VR work for a while, left that action behind and went back to a VM. Still running a VM but now on a i7/32GB Mini which runs spectacularly well :) I mean, right now I've got several apps running on MacOS (ST2, Soulver, Mail, Cal, Messages, Photos, Postman, Chrome with 20+ tabs, Notes, iTunes), several services, plus the VM running VS17 (two instances), SQL, SSMS, IIS, and the machine is barely breaking a sweat.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Boyd01
Apple has a built-in hypervisor framework. There was a company that actually leveraged it and released their own virtualization product built on that framework - Veertu. The app was even on the macOS App Store. For whatever reason, it was discontinued. I've read that the newer versions of Parallels and VMware Fusion leverage the Apple's hypervisor framework.

I am surprised Apple doesn't make virtualization part of the standard macOS utilities.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Blu-ray1972
People pay more for Netflix per year.. Their pricing isn’t all that bad if you need virtualization. If you just mess around with virtualization, then this product was never aimed at you
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheAppleFairy
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.