Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Horse hockey. I am not sure what configuration you used, but I have never had a problem using Parallels & Win98/Win7 running a range of USB devices - hard disks, printers, scanners, camera, WiFi dongles, and even a fairly esoteric laboratory data acquisition device. No doubt Marx55 did encounter problems, but that's hardly universal.

Could be based on an early experience. The first versions were limited in USB support, but I've found no problems with anything (and I connect some pretty weird USB equipment) since Parallels 4. In fact I've found no rough edges with Parallels since 4 with Windows. (Linux is another story, and I use Virtual Box for that, which has inferior USB support!)
 
Wow, just bought Parallels yesterday :rolleyes:
But fortunately I should be eligible for the free upgrade code and it says that they're going to send the code via mail. Didn't expect that...

Now, I'm looking forward to see if P7 will run even smoother on my i7 MBA, I casually use it for a bit CAD editing, so performance increase always sounds good.
 
What would be brilliant is a way to install Windows 7, without me giving money to Microsoft. I need that OS, but I dont think Microsfot diserves to get more OS share or money from OS sales.

Its just a principle thing, I do like Microsfot hardware products, I have 3 mouses from them.

A "principle thing"? WTF principle is that? Do you steal anyone else's software of expect anyone else to give it to you for being so principled? I admit Windows 7 is expensive, but if you need it then buy it...don't complain about having to pay money for something you need. Do you go to the car dealer and expect them to give you a car for free on principle?

----------

Horse hockey. I am not sure what configuration you used, but I have never had a problem using Parallels & Win98/Win7 running a range of USB devices - hard disks, printers, scanners, camera, WiFi dongles, and even a fairly esoteric laboratory data acquisition device. No doubt Marx55 did encounter problems, but that's hardly universal.

I suspect a lot of the instability that people report about Parallels is due to problems with Windows itself and/or Windows programs. Perhaps not all of it, but I have been using Parallels since version 4 and I have had fewer problems with Parallels Windows VM's than I have had with native Windows systems....

I have trouble with a DoD CAC card reader under Parallels 6, works perfectly with VMWare Fusion 3. I want to like Parallels but it's not so far ahead in speed that I need to switch but it's close.
 
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_3_5 like Mac OS X; en-gb) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8L1 Safari/6533.18.5)

Only issue I had was with the graphics drivers and only with certain builds of parallels. Was weird. Would draw 3d structures with lines running through. Made it look very messy with my 3D cad structures.
 
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_3_5 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8L1 Safari/6533.18.5)

Anyone tried gaming with the new parallels? Is there any big improvement or is it still pretty much impossible?
 
My question about 7 is, since it now supports Lion's full screen mode, will it still support the old full screen mode so I can run Windows full screen on one display and Lion full screen on another?

My Parallels history -- used since version 1. About version 3 I tried Fusion as well since Parallels support had (or should I say has) always been shoddy but found Fusion less well integrated into OS X and ran the apps I was concerned about slower. I do use VirtualBox for Linux VMs.

In general I buy only full versions, not upgrades, and wait for the full versions to be on sale for less cost than the upgrade price.


Full screen mode on dual monitors is now messed up. You enter full screen on Parallels 7 and it leaves your second monitor useless.
 
Come On!! Give Us A Break!

Dang, I had to pay for the upgrade from 5 to 6, and now they want ANOTHER $49 for 7???? :eek::eek::eek: Why not give users of 6 a free upgrade???? :rolleyes: I understand this isn't a forced upgrade; however, with the money I spend, I expect to have their latest technology!!!!
 
I run Snow Leopard Server as VM on my i7 MacBook Air and it works OK, except that it defaults to 1024x768 and I haven't figured out yet how to change it.

I just figured out that Parallels Tools in Parallels Desktop 7 works well with Snow Leopard Server and allows me to change the resolution. I now have a usable Snow Leopard setup for any old PowerPC apps I want to run.

That said, Full Screen Mode in OS X Server is still a little buggy. It reverts to 1024x768 when I minimize it and stays there. It works fine with Windows.
 
Ridiculous upgrade policy!!!

Because older version doesn't run on Lion, I bought PD6 on July 22. Paid immediately after an hour of trial run. Now I have to pay another $50. Customers got punished because they liked the product so much, didn't hold up until Aug.1…Ridiculous! I can't get free update just because I paid 8 days earlier! !?? It's so mean to make older versions incompatible and force people pay them over and over again!

And you know why they picked up August 1? Because, their return policy says:

Within 30 days of your product download purchase, you may request a full refund from Parallels for any reason. We cannot accept returns more than 30 days after your purchase.

Today is Sep 1. Exactly a month! Got it? If they make the date Aug 2, people could ask for refund, and buy P7 instead of paying upgrade fee.

They make it Aug 1 so there's no way you can ask for refund.

Parallels should give free update to everyone who bought P6 after Lion's release date!

I just wrote a complaint. I suggest we keep complaining. If they get too many complaints, I'm sure their upgrade policy will change.
 
I was wondering, why would someone wants to run OSX Lion in parallel desktops?

For example, developers who need to develop or test software on "clean" platforms, or even regular uses who want to test something first without risking their regular machine.
 
What would be brilliant is a way to install Windows 7, without me giving money to Microsoft. I need that OS, but I dont think Microsfot diserves to get more OS share or money from OS sales.

Its just a principle thing, I do like Microsfot hardware products, I have 3 mouses from them.

If you need it, then why shouldn't they get your money? How is stealing a "principle" thing? And please spare me the "Microsoft is the evil empire" speech. Apple is becoming an even bigger evil empire.
 
I was wondering, why would someone wants to run OSX Lion in parallel desktops?

I already answered that question but I will do it again.

Developers, Enterprise admins, and packagers need it to do environmental testing and use snapshots to revert back to cases to do testing and software packaging. Windows admins have had this ability for ages and its a MUST for any Enterprise admin or Developer.
 
Because older version doesn't run on Lion, I bought PD6 on July 22. Paid immediately after an hour of trial run. Now I have to pay another $50. Customers got punished because they liked the product so much, didn't hold up until Aug.1…Ridiculous! I can't get free update just because I paid 8 days earlier! !?? It's so mean to make older versions incompatible and force people pay them over and over again!

And you know why they picked up August 1? Because, their return policy says:



Today is Sep 1. Exactly a month! Got it? If they make the date Aug 2, people could ask for refund, and buy P7 instead of paying upgrade fee.

They make it Aug 1 so there's no way you can ask for refund.

Parallels should give free update to everyone who bought P6 after Lion's release date!

I just wrote a complaint. I suggest we keep complaining. If they get too many complaints, I'm sure their upgrade policy will change.
I sense much anger in you.

Method to Parallels ownership: Purchase every other upgrade. It feels less painful to the wallet.

Also, if you are nice, they will often give special discounts for recent purchasers. Beyond what is publicly displayed on the upgrade page. I think I got one upgrade as follows after asking for a deal...

Their published pricing:
$80 retail
$40 upgrade
$10 upgrade if purchased in last 30 days
$0 upgrade if purchased in last week
Me:
I purchased 50 days before, paid $20
 
So good I waited. I believed the new version would come between september and october.

No full screen support? It would be so cool to have Windows 7 on a space.
 
You will learn to hate Parallels over time, like I did. I now use VMware and strangely enough, I don't get screwed over once a year.

If you want some sound advice - decamp to VMWare or VirtualBox today and never look back. Trust me, it'll be cheaper. You will end up spending more money on Parallels than you will on OSX and Windows.

Same here and I agree totally, I switched and never looked back. It was Lion ready when Lion came out and I VM'd Lion for fun as it also supported that from before Lion's release. I'm currently running VMWare's beta and it flies.

----------

Depends on your definition of "better"

VMWare is updated less often which means that it doesnt always have some of the cutting edge features(for instance you still cannot virtualize Lion on it yet), but at least in my experience it is significantly more stable and performs better to boot. However since I do not virtualize Windows, I virtualize Leopard Server and Linux, and dont do any graphics stuff on either platform YMMV.

I was virtualizing Lion Beta in VMware and now Lion, where did you get your info?
 
the new Lion licensing schema

This is interesting... included licensing for 2 additional copies of Lion simultaneously.

So I suspect one could run Linux on the bare iron (or Parallel's Bare Iron edition hypervisor) and have 3 distinct instances of Lion running in VMs
 
yay, screw spaces, now I can make a true space :p

I have VMware fusion (which is awesome!), I hope this makes them do something similar. I would like it if they allowed both Lion and Snow Leopard Virtual machines, that would be super cool! :apple:
 
I've been able to use my USB BluRay drive to watch BR discs in Windows using Parallels.
Store-bought, normal Blu-Ray movies? Or homemade blu-rays? Because if what you're saying is true, and Parallels 7 has finally enabled real blu-ray playback (unlike that horribly-reviewed wannabe stuff which claims to be the first mac blu-ray player), that's HUGE news. That's bigger than every other feature of Parallels 7 combined. That's bigger news than Steve Jobs stepping down as CEO. Every Home Theater forum on the internet would be buzzing..

Yet Parallels doesn't even list this on their website. So I have a hard time believing it actually works...
 
I sense much anger in you.

Method to Parallels ownership: Purchase every other upgrade. It feels less painful to the wallet.

Also, if you are nice, they will often give special discounts for recent purchasers. Beyond what is publicly displayed on the upgrade page. I think I got one upgrade as follows after asking for a deal...

Their published pricing:
$80 retail
$40 upgrade
$10 upgrade if purchased in last 30 days
$0 upgrade if purchased in last week
Me:
I purchased 50 days before, paid $20

Thank you man, nice to know.
I left a comment on their company blog, someone emailed me very soon, asking for my product key, name and address. Guess maybe they'll offer me a deal.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.