I struggled with whether to get Fusion or Parallels when I bought my MBP three years ago. It is a very close call. Both virtualization programs are fine but they are also somewhat different. Although I have been very pleased with Fusion over the past three years, I really think that I would have been equally happy with Parallels. The bottom line is that you can't go wrong with either virtualization program. I should add that Fusion 3.1 has handled the same setup on my MBA I run on the MBP and does so just as well.just ordered mba 13 4gb ram...
now time to get a virtualization software before BF ends...
which one u guys using? are they pretty much the same..or one is better than another...
for windows... which version to go with ? xp , vista or 7 ?
I struggled with whether to get Fusion or Parallels when I bought my MBP three years ago. It is a very close call. Both virtualization programs are fine but they are also somewhat different. Although I have been very pleased with Fusion over the past three years, I really think that I would have been equally happy with Parallels. The bottom line is that you can't go wrong with either virtualization program. I should add that Fusion 3.1 has handled the same setup on my MBA I run on the MBP and does so just as well.
do any of these apps help moving from Windows? like moving files etc...
there is a deal on Parallels now... its buy the version 5 and free upgrade to version 6.. costs only $ 16...
fusion is like 45 bucks...
should I get the parallels before the promo ends?
I used to work with Parallels (version 3), which was really good at that time, till VMWare released their version 3 of Fusion (which is still the most current one), which performed quite a lot better on my machines. Since it was better I didn't look back to Parallels till recently.
Today, I highly recommend the current version of Parallels (6). It blows Fusion 3 out of the water, by any means. It is considerably faster and system integration is better as well.
VirtualBox is alright, I prefer Parallels, though. Especially the 3D graphics support is amazing. You really don't realise that it's a VM any more.
No, I don't think you can do drag 'n drop files between Mac and Win with Virtualbox.
Are you saying you can buy Parallels 6 for $16? Please show link. I am using Fusion 3, but would be happy to try Parallels for $16.
http://www.amazon.com/Parallels-Des..._1_1?s=software&ie=UTF8&qid=1290813964&sr=1-1
this is version 5. there is a $ 20 MIR..
then it says u can upgrade free from parallels website...
You do realize that is a free version called virtualbox, don't you?
http://www.virtualbox.org/
By far the best way to transfer files between Windows apps and OS X apps, or between any two apps for that matter, is with Dropbox. I have setup Dropbox in both Windows and OS X on both my MBA and MBP. That way, any file saved to the Dropbox folder in one OS will automatically be saved to the other, as well as to the other computers upon which the Dropbox app as been installed. The Dropbox app automatically syncs all files via the Internet to all other Dropbox folders with the same account that you setup on other computers or different OSs on the same computer. Better yet, a 2GB account is free. Try it, you'll like it.do any of these apps help moving from Windows? like moving files etc...
there is a deal on Parallels now... its buy the version 5 and free upgrade to version 6.. costs only $ 16...
fusion is like 45 bucks...
should I get the parallels before the promo ends?
which one u guys using? are they pretty much the same..or one is better than another...
for windows... which version to go with ? xp , vista or 7 ?
So why are people saying Parallels is better? Back when I first got Fusion, Parallels was considered slow and buggy and everyone seemed frustrated with the company. What changed, why is Parallels considered better by some?
It's no longer slow and buggy.
Same 3D acceleration support
Same Seamless window mode
Same fullscreen support
Free.
Seriously, why anyone would waste money on Fusion or Parallels is a mystery to me.
VirtualBox lacks some features of Parallels and Fusion. For instance, it doesn't work well using a Boot Camp partition as a virtual machine.
By definition, all virtualization programs are memory hogs. My MBP failed to give me satisfactory performance when I was trying to run Windows 7 apps in VMware Fusion's Unity mode with only 2GB of RAM. Only after upgrading the MBP to 6GB of RAM did it satisfactorily handle my setup. My MBA handles the same setup with 4GB of RAM that the MBP did with 6GB but does require a 1GB swap file, which results in a significant number of page outs. The page outs, though, don't slow things down noticeably. I think, that's primarily a result of the MBA's ultra fast flash storage.I've been using VirtualBox along with Dropbox across my ThinkPads / MacBook Pro & Air / iPhone / Android phones. Performance (admittedly my laptops are loaded with ram) has been stellar. I'm running two VM's Win7 & Linux on my i7 MBP and I could not be happier.
do any of these apps help moving from Windows? like moving files etc...
there is a deal on Parallels now... its buy the version 5 and free upgrade to version 6.. costs only $ 16...
fusion is like 45 bucks...
should I get the parallels before the promo ends?