Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I do have to question what's your motivation here - Do you have a vested interest in Parallels, or are you more concerned with telling me that I should behave more like you would?

AppleMatt

Shrug, I really have no interest either way. I suppose my 'vested interest' is that because I got Parallels with the MU Bundle, I was hoping it wasn't terrible. Like I said above, it wasn't.

You're free to say whatever you wish. It just seemed to me your comments ventured out of constructive into rather rude. Do with it what you wish. I don't know you and I'm sure you're a nice guy—and I don't go around looking to pick fights with anyone—it just seemed to me your posts left the realm of helpful a while back.

But I'm not really interested in arguing with you. I was offering what now appears to be unwelcome feedback, so I'll cease. I'll read any reply you might post, but you can have any final words you wish.
 
I've used both programs, and I personally prefer VMware Fusion. I find the interface more user-friendly, but that's just me. Questions like this all come down to personal preference, you're free to try both Parallels and Fusion before you make your decision. Therefore, why not just go try it out yourself?
 
Shrug, I really have no interest either way. I suppose my 'vested interest' is that because I got Parallels with the MU Bundle, I was hoping it wasn't terrible. Like I said above, it wasn't.

I bought my first Parallels in the same bundle and it too was great, unfortunately the 4.0 upgrade was not so great. I appreciate things don't always go well with software but that's when you turn to the support, unfortunately however 1) They didn't understand English - no solutions. 2) One of the main reasons I upgraded was based on a lie about technology that wasn't shipping. 3) Features that were promised as free upgrades were then charged for.

You're free to say whatever you wish. It just seemed to me your comments ventured out of constructive into rather rude. Do with it what you wish. I don't know you and I'm sure you're a nice guy—and I don't go around looking to pick fights with anyone—it just seemed to me your posts left the realm of helpful a while back.

I completely understand your point that a calm post would have appeared better, but I disagree it 'left the realm of helpful' - if someone punched you in the face you're going to be angry, shout, jump a little. It doesn't make what you say any less valid.

I think only my last paragraph was rude, the prior ones were simply blunt - I'm not going to let incorrect things lie for the sake of being polite, I prefer facts and evidence. I hope if I need information and you spot something you'll be equally as direct in making sure I get what I need, and not preserving someone else's or my feelings whilst leaving me poorly informed. I won't be upset if you come across as rude, I'll be pleased you said it.

But I'm not really interested in arguing with you. I was offering what now appears to be unwelcome feedback, so I'll cease. I'll read any reply you might post, but you can have any final words you wish.

Whilst way off base about the reviews, you were right about the email. However, I hope that gives others an indication of what they're getting into - that was the result of tens of prior [support tickets] where, once written, I then got my partner to also re-edit them and make sure it was as plain English, concise and understandable as possible (we both endure professional writing in our work). Didn't work - I got utterly bizarre broken-English replies.

If the OP reads the post they'll see genuine issues not only about the software but about Parallels current mode of operation. That's certainly more helpful than 'yeh it's great' - but no-one picks up on the myriad of vague positive posts, they only start to deconstruct someones argument when it's negative :rolleyes:.

AppleMatt
edit: I'm very doubtful Sean/Leto/Parallels will reply and address the issues raised, because I've noticed such things raised on other blogs/websites etc. either get shot down for being biased (without addressing the content) or completely ignored - and so it continues.
 
1st time poster.. Long time reader.. Ty..Ty..Ty..! lol

Just so I get this right... and I dont meaninglessly? make another thread... I can use Bootcamp to install XP Pro on a 2nd partition. Then I can setup my 2nd, or 3rd Space to utilize VM Fusion and run XP Pro within Mac OSX if I need to use a windows program. Or I can restart my mac alltogether and run soley with XP Pro if I wanted to play a game..?

How does playing Steam games or like Call of Duty 4/5 threw VM Fusion differ from soley running XL Pro only at startup? I am aware that running OSX and them VM Fusion'ing XP Pro will take some multi-tasking RAM usage away.. What do you guys think?

Ill be getting my MBP 15" 2.66ghz, 4 gigs, 320gig, 9600GT on Wedsnesday and want to get a list going of stuff I am going to download!!!!

Im debating downloading the VM Fusion torrent or just buy it outright.. lol
 
True that bro.. Ill use VMware Fusion to run XP Pro within OSX when I have it plugged in sometimes.. Using it on battery drains the battery faster.
 
Im debating downloading the VM Fusion torrent or just buy it outright.. lol

If you download the torrent, less money will be invested into future development - consumers like you will suffer.

Whilst I don't think anyone should steal software I realise that's entirely unrealistic so a good rule of thumb would be 'if you were going to or had to buy it anyway, then buy it' (and enjoy support, updates that don't need cracks, not having to find new serials etc).

AppleMatt
 
No experience with parallels but have been using fusion without a glitch since the day i bought my mac...

Updates to new versions are included in the price too :)
 
Im debating downloading the VM Fusion torrent or just buy it outright.. lol

For goodness sake man! It's like £65.00 ($79.99) - hardly breaking the bank!! :rolleyes:

Anyway, as Duff Man rightly said this subject has been done to death (albeit new versions are released) - but for me, personally, VMWare hands down.

Again, personally speaking, I prefer the interface of Parallels (versions 1 to 3 - haven't tried 4, so can't comment). But Fusion (I've used version 1 and 2) is killer and works a treat; it understands low level Windows API calls, unlike Parallels from experience!!

Seriously, go for Fusion - it makes sense! (Good support too - only needed it once, but they were on the money and very quickly!)
 
Another vote for Vmware, Back when both were fairly new products I tried and used both. While my perspective on Parallels may be a bit stale since I've not used it for a couple of versions I think its still accurate.

Vmware, better performance, stability and ability to select more then 1 cpu for the guest OS. They have a long track record with virtualization so support and a solid application is the result.

Parallels, they seem a bit quicker out of the gate with updates but so much so they've had stability issues in the past. I've also had a lot issues dealing with support and getting things resolved. They have also in the past over promised features and under delivered them.

I think both products have matured into a great platforms for running guest OSs on a mac but I think VMware does it better with superior support.
 
Fusion actually works on my system, whereas Parallels 3 and 4 both give me cryptic error messages when I ask it to recognize the existence of my Boot Camp installation.

Fusion it is, then.
 
Don't use Parallels.

Or if you do, get Parallels 3.0, not the newer 4.0. Every time I use it I consider murdering someone. I've never thought about murdering someone before I used that program. Dog slow (the old one wasn't), completely unpredictable. Also they have for years promised free updates with features that either haven't materialised or they've actually decided to charge for them. On the 'joke of a company' scale, they rank way up there with eBay and PayPal.

I got really close when after a long email exchange with their 'support' and got completely irrelevant replies in appallingly broken-English. In the end I just said 'BROKEN. WANT MONEY BACK.' - and I got it!

AppleMatt

I thought 3.0 was horrible, i had nothing but problems. IT was dog slow. 4.0 is wayyyy faster, its easy to use. And their support is awesome. I had a few problems and i had a reply within a day. Usually they emailed me a patch or build directly. But yah, google the pros and cons. Thread like this is useless, its plainly opinion by everyone.
 
I use both, but I've had many problems with Parallels when running anything other than Windows. This said, I haven't run OS X in Parallels, but many Linux distros do have problems, such as when copying locked (Write protected, not locked in place) files and stuff.

I use VMware for Linux and Parallels for Windows.
If you plan to run Windows, then I'd recommend Parallels, something (in my opinion) VMware can't compete with.
 
I thought 3.0 was horrible, i had nothing but problems. IT was dog slow. 4.0 is wayyyy faster, its easy to use.

Just out of interest, did you do a clean install with new virtual machines or upgrade your install and upgrade the virtual machines to the new format? I always wondered if that affected it.

Thread like this is useless, its plainly opinion by everyone.

I completely agree.

AppleMatt
 
I use VMware fusion and i love it. I tried the parallels 30 day trial and setting up virtual machines is way easier on VMware. Also, parallels left these annoying bridged networks on my computer that I can't seem to get rid of even when I did the parallels uninstall. Tjhe unity feature in VMware is also really cool because you can run linux or windows apps side by side with mac ones. I would definitely go for fusion
 
i've been happy with vmware at work but noticed performance does slip over time, i'm going to give parallels a try.
 
I searched for a phrase and found this thread. I'd add my experience here rather creating a new thread.

I recently upgraded to PD5 from PD4. I have concerns from the beginning, for a US$ 79.90 (or commonly after discount US$ 69.90) product, an upgrade of US$ 49.90 is quite high price for an upgrade.

When I sent PD support an email, it takes them 2-3 days to reply. When I couldn't wait, I made international call from far east to US only to found that either the estimated waiting time is 29 minutes or I got hung up automatically after entering support code. I tried more than 5 times. PD support later acknowledges technical issues on their part.

I tried their support chat which had worked the first time I tried, but on that night, it was on position 3, waiting for 30-40 minutes until I get into position 1 then it ended my queue with 'Support Code needs to be entered', I did entered it. I tried 3 times.

I sent them an email complaint, they did respond back 1-2 days later. They are always eager to provide a refund and wanting to resolve my issues but if I can't reach support (which is limited 30 days for chat and support, afterwards 19.90/incident), it'd be no use.

It may be a great product but after sales services is unacceptable to me. I'll just have to revert to PD4 until one day when I find time to fiddle with VMware fusion (who knows I'll like it and perhaps convert).

It is a shame to have a great product doing a wrong thing.
 
VMware Fusion 3 problems

I just got VMware fusion 3 to run Ubuntu Linux, which I will be using for university. I had used a trial version of Parallel's 5, which I was quite happy with, but purchased VMware because it's academic version was much cheaper. Since I already had the virtual machine of Ubuntu linux from Parallel's, I tried importing it, but it crashed VMware fusion (I got that colour wheel thing and it wouldn't go away).

I force quit VMware and tried it again. This time, I don't get the colour wheel, but the program doesn't respond, and I cannot force quit. I cannot even delete the virtual machine.

I tried downloading the latest patch 3.0.1, but the download doesn't work either. This is getting really annoying.

Does anyone have any suggestions on how to fix this problem?
 
I have both Parallels and VMWare Fusion. And I have found that Fusion is overall a better product. In general they are about the same in terms of features, but Parallels seems to be more buggy. :( I can't even use my Parallels that I paid for because of a bug that prevents it to run under certain situations. After researching it, it has been in there since version 1.0 and still exists today and there is no work around for it.

I'm considering buying another Fusion license. . . but right now I don't need it.
 
I used to use parallels and have switched to fusion a year or two ago and was pretty happy with it. I believe that was when parallels (I think version 2?) heats up my macbook pro too much and slows the whole computer that I decided to switch to fusion.

I've been following this thread because I just want to know how these two software compare as of now after so many versions have been released so far and so many features have been added. However, what I am reading now is parallels is still kind of buggy like before and fusion is just going steady and slow. So, I guess I haven't missed much by sticking with fusion. BTW, if you want to game on a virtual machine, I'd say don't do it and go use bootcamp.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.