Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
This is EXACTLY the kind of terrible idea that makes Apple so innovative and creative :) Luckily, it tends to be the better ideas that make it to shelves.
Bingo. This patent is to stop others from getting this type of functionality and making it dificult for them to inovate. Mean time Apple has time to leap the competition again.
This is not at all surprising. If you're an innovative company, you are going to have teams of people brainstorming all kinds of novel concepts. Nobody expects them all to become products - your team comes up with several hundred concepts, most of which never get beyond the "concept document" stage. A few of the best ones go further, to an actual design document, and to engineering mock-ups. The ones that go over best at that stage make their way to products. All the rest fall by the wayside.

But during all this work, you file a patent application for every concept you can. You need this as protection - someone else may be developing the same idea at the same time. Without the patent, they can sue you, even though you never saw their product during your R&D. With the patent, either they won't sue (because the patent is yours) or you'll have a portfolio of other patents to threaten counter-suit with.
 
I hate new designs.

Change is not good:(

if it anint broke dont fix it!:mad: :mad: :mad: :mad:

I guess we should all be driving cars that look like the Gremlin and working on green text on black screens non-GUI computers then, too! Oh wait, then we wouldn't have this board for people to complain on ...
 
But during all this work, you file a patent application for every concept you can. You need this as protection - someone else may be developing the same idea at the same time. Without the patent, they can sue you, even though you never saw their product during your R&D. With the patent, either they won't sue (because the patent is yours) or you'll have a portfolio of other patents to threaten counter-suit with.

This post reminds me why I despise the patent system.
 
This just seems a bit awkward to me. How easy is it to select thing you can't really see?

The touch-sensitive area on the back will probably be something that works like a track pad.
Who looks at his track pad when working with a laptop computer? You just look at the cursor on your display while touching the track pad with your hands. Plain and simple.
This new iPod will work the same (with the exception that the track pad will be located on the back of the device, which makes sense because you hold an iPod in your hand). Brilliant idea. Bring it on, Steve!
 
does not make any sense to me. the iPhone is developed to be interacted with through/on the screen. this is certainly an offspring from research that might be usable. why would I buy a "backside" ipod when I can buy a "frontside" iPhone? why wouldn't the next generation work the way the iPhone works?
 
The touch-sensitive area on the back will probably be something that works like a track pad.
Who looks at his track pad when working with a laptop computer? You just look at the cursor on your display while touching the track pad with your hands. Plain and simple.
This new iPod will work the same (with the exception that the track pad will be located on the back of the device, which makes sense because you hold an iPod in your hand). Brilliant idea. Bring it on, Steve!

It's not a trackpad, the patent shows a keyboard. What you do on the back would be mirrored on the display on the front, like a graphics tablet, not just pushing around a curser like a mouse/trackball/trackpad.
 
meh... don't think I'd be a fan of it. I don't stare at the scroll wheel or anything but I like the way a single one sided setup handles. Guess user testing would show that part after awhile >.>
 
i don't like the idea of using my index finger on the bottom side. i like using my thumb to navigate.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.