XyliX said:Actually I switched and then switched back, the main reason was bad hardware not OSX. I bought a 12" powerbook 1.4GHz (if I recall corecctly) with 1.25GB RAM. The screen was way to bad for my needs, low resolution and poor backlight. The overall system performance was also not satisfying.
I kept it for little more than half a year before I sold it and bought a PC laptop.
I am thinking about switching again to a Mac Pro or maybe an iMac (if they will upgraded with some better/faster components). That's why I am hanging around here.
clevin said:you must be kidding me, "0.1" in OSX is comparable to XP vs. VISTA? There is huge difference between "add some eye candy" and "changing the system structure".
Linux, in terms of usability and available software is miles behind OSX or even Windows. Yes, there is eye candy now, or at least soon. But the available software... mostly free software, likes to be terrible and unusable, as if the developers stop working when it works for them. It's great that it's free, but Gimp for example is terrible when compared to Photoshop (sure, there is this price difference, but you don't have any choice. If you want to use some professional software, you'll need to use Windows or OSX.clevin said:Mac is always in a closed developing system, it doesn't attract software developers, thats the problem, there is no breakthrough improvement since OSX first released in 2001, and somehow Jobs managed to get people to pay him $129 every year. Look at Linux, it won't take long for OSX to lose its "prettier face" advantage. those Xgl 3D effect under linux is already surpass OSX technically.
kadajawi said:And about the safety of Windows... yes... after you have just installed it you really have to be careful, or else it takes 2 minutes until your system is infected by dozens of viruses etc. Best thing is to stay offline, have SP2 on a CD or so and install it... then only go only, with the first site you visit being Windows update. But if you take care a bit, update once in a while, and most of all don't do stupid things, then it will be quite safe. And if you choose good hardware and don't install every crap, you will have a reliable system too.
miles behind? you need seriously retry linux before you make these statements. other than big commercial software such as MS Office, there ain't such thing called "miles behind". "freeware likes to be terrible and unusable?" these blindly over confident statement will not be helpful. don't forget OSX is derived from a bunch of freewares. Just can't believe Mac users are so over confident.kadajawi said:Linux, in terms of usability and available software is miles behind OSX or even Windows. Yes, there is eye candy now, or at least soon. But the available software... mostly free software, likes to be terrible and unusable, as if the developers stop working when it works for them. It's great that it's free, but Gimp for example is terrible when compared to Photoshop (sure, there is this price difference, but you don't have any choice. If you want to use some professional software, you'll need to use Windows or OSX.
Sorry, but for the past maybe 2 years I've been a Linux user, with some periods of Linux usage before. It has improved greatly, but I still find Linux pretty bad, and eventhough I learned to hate Windows (which I've used for like 9 to 10 years before my switch to Linux), during the time I used Linux I've started to think Windows isn't as bad as everyone said it is. My Linux broke quite often too, although that might have been because I'm a Gentoo user, and Gentoo just loves to break. I really like OSX (most parts of it at least), even though I started using it maybe a week ago or so. I'm using Expose and the Dashboard all the time 🙂clevin said:miles behind? you need seriously retry linux before you make these statements. other than big commercial software such as MS Office, there ain't such thing called "miles behind". "freeware likes to be terrible and unusable?" these blindly over confident statement will not be helpful. don't forget OSX is derived from a bunch of freewares. Just can't believe Mac users are so over confident.
net26 said:I "switched" before the intel revolution, and because I need autocad to earn money ... I tried using other cad software on the mac, but it just doesn't cut it. Plus I don't have the time to master another program between projects.
net26 said:I "switched" before the intel revolution, and because I need autocad to earn money 😀 i haven't been able to switch completely and get rid of those hideous metal and plastic boxes on my other desk. I tried using other cad software on the mac, but it just doesn't cut it. Plus I don't have the time to master another program between projects. As soon as the 23' iMac gets released, my pc goes on ebay 😀 Like someone already said, when you begin using OSX it completely changes your lifestyle... anyone who hasn't tried it should, especially the people who are kind of fed up with windows and sick of spending at least 4h/week maintaining their system (I know a lot of people like that). But they all still seem to believe that there is no software WHATSOEVER for the mac :S and in my experience this is only true for games and acad 😀 😀
technicolor said:You can already install OSX on a PC.
The easy depends on the system you have... there are some where it is rather easy. Legally... yeah, but quite a few buy a Mac after they tried it on their system... people who wouldn't have switched without OSx86. And OSx86 has quite a few problems, so it's rather a trial version than the real thing.GFLPraxis said:Not legally, not easily.
It's not that it's really neccessary to use professional software, but in some cases it's just much more pleasant, and gives more possibilities. The advantage of Macs is that they have support from commercial companies. Linux doesn't. And I suppose that with some effort most Linux programs will run on OSX.clevin said:well, Like I said, unless u are have to use some big commercial software.... then you have no choice, and please be aware that most people are not in need of those. unfortunately your daily work fall in that big commercial software user directory.
Audio player? xmms isn't that bad, is it? and even under mac, how many choices do you have? to be honest, even less than under linux. I don't see anything promising in iTunes, bloated as under windows, even realplayer under mac consumes less system resources than iTunes.
And looking around, how many softwares does apple have to develop by themselves just for basic use? coz no other developer is doing the job, the bundle of iLife is not because apple want to give user a candy, is because its difficult for normal user to find them from 3-rd party by themselves for free.
To compare software availability, there is no doubt windows has the edge, for mac, it isn't much better than linux. Although OSX's switch to Unix base might help. But right now, none of these too can catch up with windows, thats just a fact.
gonyr said:I think I've got you, at over 21 years. In order, I've had:
1. Mac 128k bought used
2. Mac Plus used
3. Mac classic new
4. Mac IIci used
5. Powerbook 520c used
6. Beige Powermac g3 tower new
7. iBook g4 new (still in use)
8. Powermac g4 MDD used (still in use)
9. next to come will be a MB or MBP in 6 months or so.
well, anyway, we are not talking about linux, and I do understand linux's software generally not very polished and not easy to setup.kadajawi said:Linux, as I have said, has a great choice of programs, but the quality is a bit lacking. With OSX it's somehow different... less quantity, better quality.
It's all about control. On Windows, you have almost 0 control of the files that get installed. Almost EVERY app needs an installer, or people who aren't geeks have no idea what to do with them.fallacy said:The concepts are a little different, not necessarily easier. The installing of an app for example. You have to mount your app, drag it to your app folder and then unmount it before deleting it. I've read a few posts where newbies didn't know they had to do this, or why they had to do this.. Perfectly understandable of course. Why the heck should I have to drag it to my apps folder? Didn't I just tell it to do that? I'm of course comparing this to the double clicking of an .exe file where ultimately all you'd have to do is click 'next' until the install is done and voila, a shortcut appears for you to use.