Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
can the e-ink screen be read in the dark? or is there a button to press, at least, for checking the time in low-light? sorry if that’s a dumb question, i watched half the video but didn’t see that covered.


I like the round face, flat/thin body, battery life. i’m not in the market for one, but it is pretty cool to know it’s out there.
It has a front light that turns on when you raise your wrist.
 
I don’t think it’s very attractive. The watch design itself—display and software aside. Use wise, smartwatch software is going to be more useful and productive on a non-round display, which is the whole point of a smartwatch. A round display excels best when it leans into analog.
 
E-ink display watch with long battery life and open-source software that allows anyone to make watch faces.
Yup. That´s why I ordered a Pebble Time 2.
Apples one (or maybe 2) days of battery life for a watch was just a nonstarter for me. I want to wear it all week without having to think about charging it.
(Just my personal opinion)
 
This article mostly overlooks what is happening here: Pebble is back because the enthusiast community kept the software going for 10 years after the company went bankrupt. This new hardware is being manufactured by a super small team to serve that enthusiast community, and Eric is being very upfront that they aren’t trying to grow it or market outside of that small bubble. This is a hobby/passion project, almost like an Etsy shop for smartwatches. It’s not comparable to what Pebble was trying to be ten years ago.

The other reason this is happening is because no one else has made an equivalent device in the interim. E-ink display watch with long battery life and open-source software that allows anyone to make watch faces. If that’s not your thing, cool, plenty of other mass market watches for you to choose from. But for the small Pebble community that thinks that is the type of smart watch they want, there has been a market hole left unfilled.

All to say, I’m glad this project is happening and that Eric is being upfront about what is and isn’t possible. I’d like to see more market competition and variety against Apple than there currently is.

Great context!
This alone is enough for me to be pulling for them to succeed.
 
Won’t be buying this, as I want a workout and durability-focused device, but I do like the idea of e-ink.

My current Garmin Instinct is the closest I’ve found in a fitness watch. It’s MIP, but monochrome. Big fan!
 
  • Love
Reactions: turbineseaplane
Interesting. Though I won't be buying one, think the new watch could be a successful product. Wonder if Apple will ever launch a circular watch.
About as much chance of this happening as there would be Apple releasing a Style for an iPad or making a giant Phablet sized smartphone.
Both items, they and many fan's poo poo'd and never wanted.

Oh wait......
 
I recently test drove the Pixel Watch 4 and, to my surprise, I was impressed. As a longtime Apple Watch guy, I never thought anything could come close to Apple’s standard for style, build quality, and OS integration. I still have no idea where the Pebble watch fits in, but I ended up keeping the Pixel Watch. 🤷‍♂️

This is getting off-topic, but I've never seen one in person. Does the crown sticking out bother your wrist at all? It looks like it would press in the hand with pushups or whatever. It's kinda "bubbly" looking, the screen is alright?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Digital Dude
I wouldn't give this grifter a dime. He left original Pebble users in the lurch when he sold off the company.
 
  • Like
Reactions: marte91
Tech is too old and it's way overpriced. This isn't a smart watch by 2026 standards. It was fine in its time, but now we have significantly better options.
 
This is getting off-topic, but I've never seen one in person. Does the crown sticking out bother your wrist at all? It looks like it would press in the hand with pushups or whatever. It's kinda "bubbly" looking, the screen is alright?
I had the same concerns at first, but they disappeared once I put it on. The Pixel Watch 4 is flatter than earlier models, the crown doesn’t dig into my wrist, and the round display actually feels more ergonomic than Apple’s square design. On my scrawny wrist it fits perfectly, especially with the shorter of the two included bands. The default watch face shows what I actually use, the haptics are stronger than my old Apple Watch 6, and the display is refreshing. The band attachment is different, but since I’m not doing water sports, it’s a non-issue. Based on my experience so far, I’d rate it a 9.5 out of 10. 📈
 
Last edited:
  • Love
Reactions: WarmWinterHat
Not sure that I need e-ink on a device I glance at for a couple of seconds. E-ink is great on the Kindle to help with eye strain; e-ink seems to be the main selling point for this watch, but at $200 with a lot of compromises, doesn't seem worth it to me. Others here are extolling the 2 week battery life, which isn't uncommon outside of Apple. My Amazfit Bip 6 ($66 now on amazon) could get nearly 2 weeks, especially if I turned off heart rate sampling and other features that the Pebble doesn't have. Amazfit has a decent-sized community building watch faces for it as well. I owned an original Pebble, and it was neat for its time, but tech has moved forward substantially since then. Need more than nostalgia to bring me back.
 
Last edited:
he should move his company over to the EU where you can force other companies to be compatible with your e-waste
People still use their 13 year old OG pebble watch how long does an Apple Watch go for? (Who’s making e-waste here?)

I seriously don’t why people on this forum is against interoperability on apple products.
You don’t have to use third party hardware - but the option is nice.
 
Migicovsky, instead of designing and producing a world class mobile device to go along with his company’s watch in order to challenge the system he claims is unfair, does what everyone else does and depends on someone else’s technology for theirs to be successful.

Maybe one day a hardware company confident enough in their product to deliver their solution with a custom OS and a desire to actually compete instead of riding someone else’s coattails. But, it’s not this company.
I’m not following this logic. Apple blocks off tons of api so no one with an iPhone can get the same integrations they get with Apple Watch.

Apple stops others from syncing deeply with iPhones, running Apple-only apps, accessing full health data, or offering features like iMessage, FaceTime, and background system tasks—basically anything that makes the Apple Watch feel like a true iPhone extension.
 
  • Like
Reactions: spyguy10709
$200 for a watch that doesn’t do heart rate monitoring?!?

Amazfit Active 2 look similar, has gps/hr monitoring, and is half the cost. Cmf watch pro 3 would be a good option as well.

After trying out the various 3rd party watches, I came crawling back to Apple. Just can’t beat the integration.
I genuinely couldn't care less about heart rate monitoring. Does the Amazfit Activ 2 have a color eink display which gives you full readable notifications but also a battery life measured in days, not hours?
 
I genuinely couldn't care less about heart rate monitoring. Does the Amazfit Activ 2 have a color eink display which gives you full readable notifications but also a battery life measured in days, not hours?
I don’t need e-ink on a watch to be able to read it. And yes, I could get nearly 2 weeks with the Active2/Bip6.

Enjoy dropping $200 on this garbage! 😂
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: Ben Sparrow
People still use their 13 year old OG pebble watch how long does an Apple Watch go for? (Who’s making e-waste here?)
When talking about the scales of a human lifetime, 70-80 years? Everyone. A device going to the landfill three years later than another device is STILL going to the landfill.
 
I’m not following this logic. Apple blocks off tons of api so no one with an iPhone can get the same integrations they get with Apple Watch.
And? No one’s telling him to tell customers that his product is iPhone compatible. If folks want them, let them buy them. Complaining essentially that they don’t make a phone compatible with their devices the way Apple, Samsung and other companies do isn’t logical in the first place. The only people preventing them from doing the same is them.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.