Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I know it's a personal preference thing and I'm all for that. Do whatever pleases you thats all that matters. But whenever I see a dainty wristed person with an oversized watch, of any kind, it just makes me chuckle. It's like some kid wearing daddy's big boys watch for the first time. But like I say, to hell with what anyone else thinks. Especially me, I have all the fashion sense of a squirrel in a mink coat :D
How dare you insult Bitsy's fashion sense! Of course Bitsy only wears faux mink. But faux mink coats for squirrels were all the rage at Fashion Week.

I do have to agree with your assessment about dainty wristed persons wearing oversized Apple Watches, however. I tried the 42 on at the Apple Store and my husband burst out laughing. The more polite sales clerk just made funny faces as if he were stifling a laugh. Or perhaps he had gas. At any rate I looked like one of the ladies in my avatar pic. And needless to say, Bitsy would not have approved.
image.jpg
 
How dare you insult Bitsy's fashion sense! Of course Bitsy only wears faux mink. But faux mink coats for squirrels were all the rage at Fashion Week.

I do have to agree with your assessment about dainty wristed persons wearing oversized Apple Watches, however. I tried the 42 on at the Apple Store and my husband burst out laughing. The more polite sales clerk just made funny faces as if he were stifling a laugh. Or perhaps he had gas. At any rate I looked like one of the ladies in my avatar pic. And needless to say, Bitsy would not have approved. View attachment 564913


Ah, that did make me chuckle :D so it would appear I know nothing of squirrel fashion either, no surprises there ;)
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5105973
are you sure the golden ratio is right where watches are concerned? I get a watch height of about 35mm!

I'm already on the edge of thinking my 38mm is a little small. It definitely seems to be compared to most mens watches I see around town. Maybe I've been brainwashed by fashion trends over traditional aesthetic...


When push comes to shove, particularly these days, people will wear whatever size watch they want to. That's fine, if your happy that's all that actually matters. No one should or indeed can tell you otherwise.

The golden ratio is a decent starting point for getting a size but there are other aspects that affect how a watch is perceived on the wrist. Such as how flat, or rounded, your wrist is, how big your hands are and where on your wrist you wear the watch. Me being an old traditionalist when it comes to watches, I wear mine to the arm side of the end of the Ulna.

Two other rules you can go by are that the watch face, including lugs, should ideally cover no less that 70% of your wrist width and no more than 85%. Secondly the lugs should never touch or overhang your wrist. If they do, then it really is too big, they should sit in from the edges of your wrist.

Working with those three rules is just what was considered "tasteful" but it's all subjective, fashion has blown all of that out of the water these days. I personally hate oversized watches and I think a big watch on a small wrist, or indeed a small watch on a big wrist, looks ridiculous. But that's just me, everyone has different opinions.

That being said, I've also had to break all of the rules myself for the Apple Watch.

My wrist is 75mm across and even with the Milanese loop adding a little extra height, with it's lugs bringing the height of the watch up to 48mm. That's still only 64% of my wrist width, so going by the above standards the Apple Watch would be 6% too small for me.
I do actually agree with that though, when I look at it, it does seem fractionally too small for my wrist and I'd be quite happy if Apple were to introduce a 46 or 48mm watch in the future.

At the end of the day there's only one true way to tell if a watch of any kind is right for you. Try it on. If it looks too big, it probably is, likewise if it looks too small. It's a sort of three bears kind of situation :D
 
Last edited:
Ah, that did make me chuckle :D so it would appear I know nothing of squirrel fashion either, no surprises there ;)
  • It's surprising how many pictures there are on the Internet of squirrels wearing clothes. An alarming number of them don't appear to be photoshopped, either. :confused: And there apparently is a company called Squirrel Fashion. They seem to specialize in backpacks and handbags and tote bags. Of course Bitsy is really into that.
    image.jpg
To Noobinator, your 150 mm wrist just happens to be wide and shaped well to look good in the 42 mm watch. My wrist is only 2 mm less in circumference but it's a narrow wrist. Also, being a small female, my forearm isn't that long. It's not just wrist size but one's overall proportions that help determine if a certain size watch is going to look good on a person.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Night Spring
  • It's surprising how many pictures there are on the Internet of squirrels wearing clothes. An alarming number of them don't appear to be photoshopped, either. :confused: And there apparently is a company called Squirrel Fashion. They seem to specialize in backpacks and handbags and tote bags. Of course Bitsy is really into that. View attachment 564930
To Noobinator, your 150 mm wrist just happens to be wide and shaped well to look good in the 42 mm watch. My wrist is only 2 mm less in circumference but it's a narrow wrist. Also, being a small female, my forearm isn't that long. It's not just wrist size but one's overall proportions that help determine if a certain size watch is going to look good on a person.


Ah, thank you, I did need cheering up today and your pics are making me chuckle away to myself. I can just see that one, tootling off to the shops for a bag of continental, artisan peanuts :p

Surely the squirrels must be stuffed though? How do you get a squirrel to pose for a photo, no scratch that, why are people dressing up squirrels :D
 
It's surprising how many pictures there are on the Internet of squirrels wearing clothes. An alarming number of them don't appear to be photoshopped, either. :confused:

I had an extremely tame pet chipmunk once. It liked sitting in my mom's cloth pockets, and came if you called its name. If squirrels can also get that tame, I suppose it's possible to get them to stay still long enough to get into clothing and take pics, but still.... :eek:
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5105973
Ah, thank you, I did need cheering up today and your pics are making me chuckle away to myself. I can just see that one, tootling off to the shops for a bag of continental, artisan peanuts :p

Surely the squirrels must be stuffed though? How do you get a squirrel to pose for a photo, no scratch that, why are people dressing up squirrels :D
It's been going on a long time. Since the 1940's according to Time magazine.

http://time.com/3517606/a-squirrels-guide-to-fashion/

That features this transgender Squirrel named Tommy Tucker who was amenable to dressing up like June Cleaver.
image.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5105973
OP - Besides just looks it'll affect how much band wraps around your wrist if you like the Milanese or Classic Buckle. If you don't want the band reaching all around to the other side you might not want to order those bands. The 42mm also feels significantly heavier. Also, the 42mm tends not to lay flat as well as the 38. It is more sensitive to any contours on your wrist. I've owned both.
 
I couldn't have gotten the 42mm because the smallest the sport band size small (and link) goes to is 140mm and I have a 136mm wrist.... So 38mm it was! I'm quite happy with it.... IMO the 42 looked ridiculous on my little wrists.... even if the hands had gone small enough....
 
I think it is really more about the wrist width than the circumference.
Some people have flatter shaped wrists than others and as long as the watch lugs don't protrude past the wrist, it looks fine.
Once the lugs or the actual dial hangs over the wrist, then it is definitely too big, although it's a personal choice.

you do need to consider the circumference because the 42mm bands only go so small....
 
I'd like to think my wrists are on the smaller side. I went to the store to try on each size and was surprised to find out that the 42mm fit perfectly. 38mm seemed too small.

I'd definitely suggest a try on, if possible. You may leave surprised.
 
When push comes to shove, particularly these days, people will wear whatever size watch they want to. That's fine, if your happy that's all that actually matters. No one should or indeed can tell you otherwise.

The golden ratio is a decent starting point for getting a size but there are other aspects that affect how a watch is perceived on the wrist. Such as how flat, or rounded, your wrist is, how big your hands are and where on your wrist you wear the watch. Me being an old traditionalist when it comes to watches, I wear mine to the arm side of the end of the Ulna.

Two other rules you can go by are that the watch face, including lugs, should ideally cover no less that 70% of your wrist width and no more than 85%. Secondly the lugs should never touch or overhang your wrist. If they do, then it really is too big, they should sit in from the edges of your wrist.

Working with those three rules is just what was considered "tasteful" but it's all subjective, fashion has blown all of that out of the water these days. I personally hate oversized watches and I think a big watch on a small wrist, or indeed a small watch on a big wrist, looks ridiculous. But that's just me, everyone has different opinions.

That being said, I've also had to break all of the rules myself for the Apple Watch.

My wrist is 75mm across and even with the Milanese loop adding a little extra height, with it's lugs bringing the height of the watch up to 48mm. That's still only 64% of my wrist width, so going by the above standards the Apple Watch would be 6% too small for me.
I do actually agree with that though, when I look at it, it does seem fractionally too small for my wrist and I'd be quite happy if Apple were to introduce a 46 or 48mm watch in the future.

At the end of the day there's only one true way to tell if a watch of any kind is right for you. Try it on. If it looks too big, it probably is, likewise if it looks too small. It's a sort of three bears kind of situation :D

I get a lot of the points you're making. The 38 on me is about 65% of my wrist width; if the lugs add 6mm then that explains why the 38mm ML looked good on me at try on (unfortunately I had to get the sport. Equality in marriage and all that; if I didn't get myself a sport but still got my wife one when she suited the modern buckle so well... 2 sports were cheaper than her watch alone would have been). That aside, it probably looks the same on me as yours on you.

I did order the 42mm space grey at first and but took my wife's sport to try out when it arrived much sooner (despite ordering 3 weeks later). then another ordered 38 sport after delivery, which still beat mine to be delivered so we've ended up with two 38s.

I'm more picky about bracelet/band than I am about watch size. I too don't like overhang, in fact I like the band to curve fully around my wrist like a circle. I think this is compounded by the fact I seem to have quite circular wrists - 180mm around last I measured yet only 58mm across. Too large a watch face and it'll be like a rotated D flat across my wrist top, when i want a rounded O including the watch itself.
 
I get a lot of the points you're making. The 38 on me is about 65% of my wrist width; if the lugs add 6mm then that explains why the 38mm ML looked good on me at try on (unfortunately I had to get the sport. Equality in marriage and all that; if I didn't get myself a sport but still got my wife one when she suited the modern buckle so well... 2 sports were cheaper than her watch alone would have been). That aside, it probably looks the same on me as yours on you.

I did order the 42mm space grey at first and but took my wife's sport to try out when it arrived much sooner (despite ordering 3 weeks later). then another ordered 38 sport after delivery, which still beat mine to be delivered so we've ended up with two 38s.

I'm more picky about bracelet/band than I am about watch size. I too don't like overhang, in fact I like the band to curve fully around my wrist like a circle. I think this is compounded by the fact I seem to have quite circular wrists - 180mm around last I measured yet only 58mm across. Too large a watch face and it'll be like a rotated D flat across my wrist top, when i want a rounded O including the watch itself.

Equality in marriage, yeah, I get the stainless steel. The wife wants the gold. I laughed so hard I had to pick my arse off the floor and reattach it with superglue :D

But yeah, you've summed it up quite nicely. The overall aesthetic is the main thing to consider when wearing a watch as far as I'm concerned.
 
Equality in marriage, yeah, I get the stainless steel. The wife wants the gold. I laughed so hard I had to pick my arse off the floor and reattach it with superglue :D

But yeah, you've summed it up quite nicely. The overall aesthetic is the main thing to consider when wearing a watch as far as I'm concerned.

i think every woman in the world probably said "ooh that's nice" when they saw the edition with the red modern buckle. then the prices came out; fortunately my wife never mentioned that one again! If she wore the watch it wouldn't be so bad, but it sits on the side of the bed for 9/10ths of the week. She's never been a watch person, whereas I've been wearing mine from wake to sleep since I got it - it's replaced my citizen ecodrive watch very nicely. The size of that watch (40mm i think) was proably a little better for my wrist, but I always used to leave it in my bag on the way to work, and only put it on for classes and then take it off again to go home. A combination of the fit and weight and heat out here, i think - the heats not going anywhere, so I'm happy to have a smaller, comfier and much more useful watch.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SHNXX
i think every woman in the world probably said "ooh that's nice" when they saw the edition with the red modern buckle. then the prices came out; fortunately my wife never mentioned that one again! If she wore the watch it wouldn't be so bad, but it sits on the side of the bed for 9/10ths of the week. She's never been a watch person, whereas I've been wearing mine from wake to sleep since I got it - it's replaced my citizen ecodrive watch very nicely. The size of that watch (40mm i think) was proably a little better for my wrist, but I always used to leave it in my bag on the way to work, and only put it on for classes and then take it off again to go home. A combination of the fit and weight and heat out here, i think - the heats not going anywhere, so I'm happy to have a smaller, comfier and much more useful watch.


Aye, the wife's not mentioned a gold one since. If I won the lottery then, well no, I still wouldn't spend that on a watch that won't stand the test of time (pardon the pun.) Or at least I don't think I would.
Comfort is a surprisingly overlooked factor for a lot of people but I think it's quite an important one. We don't get much in the way of heat in Scotland, but with my stupid arm not conforming to any kind of temperature I like the breathability of the Milanese loop. That's one of the things that makes it my top strap so far.

Do you teach somewhere nice that you have to suffer such relentless heat.
 
I bought both the 38 and 42. My wrist are about 155 and i chose the 42. Ive tried both of them for about 3 weeks.
So, Id say: 42!
 
Aye, the wife's not mentioned a gold one since. If I won the lottery then, well no, I still wouldn't spend that on a watch that won't stand the test of time (pardon the pun.) Or at least I don't think I would.
Comfort is a surprisingly overlooked factor for a lot of people but I think it's quite an important one. We don't get much in the way of heat in Scotland, but with my stupid arm not conforming to any kind of temperature I like the breathability of the Milanese loop. That's one of the things that makes it my top strap so far.

Do you teach somewhere nice that you have to suffer such relentless heat.

Southern China. It's a lot hotter than back home!
 
i think every woman in the world probably said "ooh that's nice" when they saw the edition with the red modern buckle. then the prices came out; fortunately my wife never mentioned that one again!.
Hey, watch it buddy, I resemble that remark! Yeah, I did exactly that. Even though I'm a bit of a tomboy most of the time, and do prefer silver jewelry now, it appealed to the side of me that does wear heels on occasion and does have a couple of fancy designer purses.

I was not expecting Apple to make the blasted things out of solid gold chunks. WTH? I would love to know what they were thinking. Had they made it like any standard gold colored watch, and I have some beautiful gold colored Seikos that have held up perfectly over two decades of solid wear, then they could have sold a lot of them to women like me.

Anyway, tomboy me is wearing the silver stainless steel with a collection of sport bands. In 38 mm. I want to someday get a modern buckle band for it. Some dreams don't die entirely.
 
I've read a lot of forum threads like this one because I've had such a hard time choosing between the 38mm S3 and the 42mm. I was pretty convinced that the 42mm would look ridiculous on my relatively small 160mm wrist, because it looks so obviously oversized in a lot the pictures that people have posted. However, I went into the apple store today to have a proper look, and visually, the difference between the two sizes was so small that I had a hard time knowing which one was which. I tried on each size with the mentality of "can I pull off the 42 without looking ridiculous?" but it ended up a case of "is the 38 too small?" Moral ofothe story: pictures are really misrepresentative. Go to an Apple store try them both.
 
I have small wrists and the 38mm ended up being a much better fit. A kind family member let me try wearing their S2 42mm for a few days to see how it felt, and I did not like it at all. Ended up getting a S3 38mm and love the fit. I have no trouble navigating the smaller screen and the battery life is excellent (I do not know if there is a significant difference in battery life between 38 and 42 though).

I remember one comment I came across while researching my own purchasing decision. The comment stated something to the effect that the 42mm watch will be immediately be recognized as more of a gadget and less a watch, while the 38mm is more understated and looks more like a "regular" watch at first glance.

Keep in mind though that 38mm will somewhat limit what straps are available - there are some straps that companies only make as 42mm. Has not affected me because I just use the plain black sport strap, as gym sweat would mess up leather over time and I do not feel like changing straps twice every day.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.