DamoTheBrave
macrumors regular
It's what Apple should be doing. I'd be reluctant to give this to Perplexity.
I am surprised seeing so much negativity in comments, could you explain what is so bad about the thing (except that it can give the wrong diagnosis but I assume one has enough cognitive abilities to see the doctor instead of bluntly relying on what the app says)?
You have too much faith in the avg person. We literally just had a CEO ignore his legal team in voiding a contract bonus which will now cost the company $$$ and damages in illegally voiding the contract.I am surprised seeing so much negativity in comments, could you explain what is so bad about the thing (except that it can give the wrong diagnosis but I assume one has enough cognitive abilities to see the doctor instead of bluntly relying on what the app says)?
As my doctor asks AI about things.All medical advice on the internet always concludes with “ask your doctor. Along with “it could be cancer or lead to death”, so ai telling you the same thing really isn’t of any help.
Unless it is not used against me it is fine. Training SkyNet on my data is fine too.If you don’t mind your biometrics being used to train “ai” models for whatever purposes the techbroligarchy sees fit from now until the end of time then there is nothing bad about it
Is it or will it remain private?I am surprised seeing so much negativity in comments, could you explain what is so bad about the thing (except that it can give the wrong diagnosis but I assume one has enough cognitive abilities to see the doctor instead of bluntly relying on what the app says)?
It's amazing how many will give up their data, believing everything they read, tossing caution to the wind, and buy into whatever narrative is being presented.How can people be so dumb to freely give away this info and others to promote it as something positive?
You’re giving the majority of society too much credit😉I am surprised seeing so much negativity in comments, could you explain what is so bad about the thing (except that it can give the wrong diagnosis but I assume one has enough cognitive abilities to see the doctor instead of bluntly relying on what the app says)?
Will see but the article says "Health data is encrypted, and Perplexity says there are strict access controls and tools to manage or delete information at any time. Health information is not used to train AI models or sold to third parties."Is it or will it remain private?
Can they sell it to health insurance companies, life insurance companies, research firms who sell info to law firms for their cases, etc?
It seems every few months I get a piece of physical mail from some company that has my info and has been breached. They do the normal BS and offer credit monitoring for 1 year for free.
Unless it is not used against me it is fine. Training SkyNet on my data is fine too.
/s
If your in the US all your social security data is already out in the wild thanks to the teenagers from DOGEThe title is misleading as I'm positive it can't access my data. Maybe it can access your data, but I'm not using this slop.
It’s like that Pokémon go game. Look at what Niantic is doing now with that data.How can people be so dumb to freely give away this info and others to promote it as something positive?
If your in the US all your social security data is already out in the wild thanks to the teenagers from DOGE
Good to know. Hopefully the health data remains protected as mentioned. Might try it out once it launches worldwide.
outside of the obviously bad idea that every other comment has already touched on, why are we making people pay hundreds of thousands to be educated on medicine & the human body if people are going to think their AI chatbot is a better practitioner of medicine. perhaps one day we'll have some ai scanner that can figure out what's wrong with you off the blood from a finger prick, but i imagine we're still a long ways out from that sort of sci fi becoming reality.
arstechnica.com