I responded to this. “I'd argue the actual ratio isn't tough at all as it's simply geometry. Argue what the number itself actually means in daily use but the number is infallible.”
The NUMBER ITSELF does NOT represent an accurate measure of usable display area with various smartphone screen designs we have in 2017. Get it?
THE NUMBER ITSELF does not represent???
Are you kidding me? Look, we can argue "usable space" and whatnot, but numbers are numbers. Bigger
is bigger. No one is arguing that Samsung's edges are "exactly the same" as a flat screen area would be, just that they allow for a BIGGER display.
They also eliminate the bezels, have a higher PPI, and don't include a (subjectively ugly, but at minimum it's controversial) NOTCH, either.
If we are being intellectually honest instead of just being fanboys, I have a hunch the vast majority of users would prefer the "larger" and technically better OLED screen of the Android flagships, without bezels and without notches, but only
if Apple made it and only if it included iOS.
That's fine, but it doesn't change the REALITY that for an "all screen" phone (Apple's words, not mine), there are already phones from two quarters ago that were objectively MORE "all screen" than the iPhone X. A phone they felt was sooooo cutting edge they had to skip 8 and 9 naming conventions and call it the X (10). They brought this point on themselves.
It just is what it is. It doesn't mean they won't sell tremendously. It doesn't mean I won't buy as many as I can get for 11/3 delivery (if any). It just means that there are already devices with a higher percentage of "all screen" out there.