Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I'll throw my hat in the ring here.

IMG_0206-resized.jpg


This was taken over the side of a bridge that crosses a sluice channel near a lock on the Mohawk river in NY. I took it with a Canon PowerShot S410 and did no post-processing except to resize it.
 
This is interesting. My brain is struggling to get perspective and figure out what's what ... (that's a good thing:)).

Maybe I should have been a little more descriptive. Right at the bridge was a wall that created a waterfall.

This is looking the other direction (downstream)
IMG_0208-resized.jpg
 
Mine for today...

[url=http://snyder7.smugmug.com/Landscapes/Olympic-National-Park/i-LTxfJMj/0/L/OlympicPeninsula-1367-Edit-L.jpg]Image[/url]

The focus is a little soft because I never bothered to double check my camera settings and so I shot this at 3200 ISO which resulted in quite a bit of noise which had to be removed with Lightroom.

Yeah, been there done that. I was just editing a shot a few days ago that I took accidentally at exactly that ISO. Didn't realize it until the moment I was trying to capture had passed, so I'm stuck with the ISO 3200 version. :( Anyway, this one of yours doesn't seem to have suffered from it (not at this size, at any rate). I really like the somber color palette and the various leading lines.

Yeah you are missing something LOL.

Firstly I shoot at the widest angle possible with my lens to get an awesome wide angle scene. I then load the image into photoshop and totally transform the colour a standard image just wont do.

I first alter the aspect ratio to 16:9 to make it more like a widescreen movie. Then I desaturate it by about -60. After this I play about with the levels & curves I like darkish tones as it looks more cinematic. Then I alter the exposure and up it maybe by 1 or 2. From this I lower the offset by about 1 to get nice dark black areas. Next I change the colour Balance I tend to go for coldish blue or green colours, again I think it looks more like a screen grab from a motion picture. After this I duplicate the primary layer and add lens blur of about 14-19 depending on the sort of image. I then create a clipping mask and use the brush tool of about 2500-3500 size to erase out the sections I want in focus, leaving parts of the image slightly blurred.

The last things I do is create another layer and make it black, then overlay that and change the opacity down to about 25%. I create another clipping mask and give sections of the image slight lighter areas generally the parts what are in focus aka the primary subject in the photo.

Last stage is to add the black letter boxing along the top and bottom of the image. Its not simply just a case of a quick edit, it can take quite a bit of work to get one image to look convincing enough i've spent several months perfecting it, by combining different techniques and overall pretty pleased with my technique.

I think with the work and edit technique it should have credibility as its own genre especially in this digital age. You have to take into account stuff like crop factor in terms of whats gonna be left visible in the image when you add boarders and what not etc and whats going to be the key subject of the image etc. in the example below its the Shard Tower.

This was one of my first cinematic attempts, as you can see I got the aspect ratio slightly wrong, but I really love the tones and grain I added [url=http://farm6.staticflickr.com/5197/7412825872_5e071e679c_b.jpg]Image[/url]
City Hall: Cinematic Effect by Ryan J. Nicholson, on Flickr

You can have a look here at my growing Cinematic set on flickr if you're interested http://www.flickr.com/photos/macmad/sets/72157629512142706/

Well, thanks for the very detailed description of your processing, but that doesn't answer my question. What you are describing regards style more than genre. Superficial treatments in Photoshop might determine the style of a photo, but content, more than anything else, will determine its genre.

I think I'm missing something, too. That's an awful lot of work to end up with a grainy, washed-out, desaturated, blurry image. Also, a 16:9 frame would not have black bars on a 16:9 HDTV.

Glad I didn't have to be the one to say that. :eek: :p

I'll throw my hat in the ring here.

IMG_0206-resized.jpg


This was taken over the side of a bridge that crosses a sluice channel near a lock on the Mohawk river in NY. I took it with a Canon PowerShot S410 and did no post-processing except to resize it.

I find myself fascinated by this photo. I see a whole landscape within it: snowcapped mountains, a green plain below with a farm on it, post-storm light overhead, and an inexplicable, epic waterfall below it all. It's abstract and representational all at once. This would look terrific enlarged as far as it will go and hanging in a modern-style frame (I would probably clone out that little bit of something floating at the top, though). Very well seen.
 
I'll throw my hat in the ring here.

IMG_0206-resized.jpg


This was taken over the side of a bridge that crosses a sluice channel near a lock on the Mohawk river in NY. I took it with a Canon PowerShot S410 and did no post-processing except to resize it.

Ha ha got it, I was struggling to understand this on my phone, just got to my laptop and now it all makes sense :)

As phrasikileia said well seen, I also love the colour palate and the parallel lines, good shot,
 
I find myself fascinated by this photo. I see a whole landscape within it: snowcapped mountains, a green plain below with a farm on it, post-storm light overhead, and an inexplicable, epic waterfall below it all. It's abstract and representational all at once. [ ...] Very well seen.

Yes, exactly! All that stuff is there, and I couldn't get a handle on it. As I said, I think that's a good thing. This is a fascinating photo that I could keep coming back to.
 
I find myself fascinated by this photo. I see a whole landscape within it: snowcapped mountains, a green plain below with a farm on it, post-storm light overhead, and an inexplicable, epic waterfall below it all. It's abstract and representational all at once. This would look terrific enlarged as far as it will go and hanging in a modern-style frame (I would probably clone out that little bit of something floating at the top, though). Very well seen.

Very interesting analysis, but you're not the first to make out a farm (or at least farmhouse) in this picture. That object (not the floating object but right near the top of the "fall") is actually me, looking down from the bridge. I wouldn't say it was taken in haste, but there wasn't much thought put into it, it was more of a "I'll snap over the edge and see what I get".
 
Kyra



EXIF
Camera: Nikon D800
Exposure: 0.006 sec (1/160)
Aperture: f/2.8
Focal Length: 70 mm
ISO Speed: 320
Exposure Bias: 0 EV
 
Ahh it's been awhile since I've posted here. This months potd is incredible!

Here's a shot of the area that I'm currently working in. The landscape is beautiful, unfortunately not much of a chance to get out and see it during 'golden hours.' Tonight I'm going to attempt to shoot some northern lights, if I can manage to stay awake long enough.


Rock View by Melissa.O.Anderson, on Flickr
 
I just meant the aspect ratio in terms of the widescreen. I have a 50" tv in my lounge and 95% of films I watch on it have black bars at the top and bottom. HD footage is of course fine though

That’s because the footage isn’t 16:9 it’s 2.35:1 (or 21:9 IN TV terms). What I think you have done in your image is take a 4:3 image and add bars to make it 16:9.

I personally don’t think it deserves it’s own genre as it seems you can apply the style to a multitude of of subjects making it very broad.

EDIT: just realised that Phrasikleia said it perfectly:

Superficial treatments in Photoshop might determine the style of a photo, but content, more than anything else, will determine its genre.



I see what you are trying to emulate, the blockbuster look, but I think it’s better suited to moving images. Have you experimented with video? It could be an interesting progression.


Don’t know if your lens held you back but was it not possible to get a wider shot with the whole car in the frame? Would have made it really nice!


Did you flash with this? Nice shot!


Just Hangin' by acearchie, on Flickr
 
Last edited:
Don’t know if your lens held you back but was it not possible to get a wider shot with the whole car in the frame? Would have made it really nice!

Haha sadly, I only had the 50mm with me at the time, and it was an extremely narrow one lane street. Had to act fast before he got away so it was a lens limitation unfortunately.
 
Haha sadly, I only had the 50mm with me at the time, and it was an extremely narrow one lane street. Had to act fast before he got away so it was a lens limitation unfortunately.

Well better to have a shot than nothing at all!


This is the Thames at Chelsea Harbour, at sunset.
7772999662_bb3b1b74af_c.jpg

This is were the internet becomes a scary place! This is about two minutes away from where I live. Are you a resident too?
 
my first photo of the day

Here ya go. Nothing super, I'm still essentially a novice on a dslr.

Taken in Arizona, on the White mountain Apache reservation, with a Canon EOS -1 Ds. EF 50 mm. f1.8 if I recall correctly. No processing, no nothing, other than to make smaller size for the forum. Hope folks like it.
 

Attachments

  • 1E7W2983.jpg
    1E7W2983.jpg
    1.2 MB · Views: 147
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.