Australian Geese
You don't need photoshop to do that!
http://www.cheapshooter.com/2007/08/01/top-online-photo-editors-grow-into-their-own/![]()
Does Kansas City ever have blue skies?What time of day do you find best to take your shots that ultimately end up HDR? Do you find it easier to create from one RAW, or do bracket exposure on 3+ shots?
I was out on the lake in my dinghy a few days ago, when I saw about twenty geese flying in formation... except they were flying along the surface of the water like stealth bombers... and heading straight for my boat. In any kind of collision between a canada goose and me, I know who'd come off second best (imagine a roast turkey being fired out of a cannon). At the last minute the formation split into two, and I got off a couple of shots as these geese past. They were very close - to the water and to me - and this is a wide-angle shot. Phew...
Not a patch on ClixPix's shot, but the same bird, I think. In UK we call them canada (not 'Canadian') geese; maybe a different name in US.
![]()
![]()
The second picture is not his--It's Clix Pix's shot from a few pages back. He posted it, vaguely referencing it being hers, to compare the geese.i LOVE the 2nd pic. fantastic.
Last night shot i'll post in a long time. promise
Let's not be too rash--some of us like night photography!
This is a great shot--where was it taken?
Let's not be too rash--some of us like night photography!
This is a great shot--where was it taken?
I've been a visitor for too long. Love Apple stuff; adore Macrumors, but Photo of the day has been my favourite haunt. The photo's are great and the community spirit, on the whole, is wonderful. I've been reticent about posting my stuff as I worry about their reception, simply because mostly I am taking these night shots where I create these abstract pieces that I hope to use further in other ways(illustration, basis for further painting/digital development etc)but obviously they are not photos of a recognizable 'something' that has required photographic skill and compositional awareness and the other skills so aptly demonstrated by, well, all of you. I don't want to be seen as some sort of photographic fraud! I think they are lovely and have artistic merit and I am using a camera(3yr old Nikon p+s)as a tool, but .... I have to admit that a hell of a lot of randomness is involved and... I worry. But that's that and I do take photo's of other stuff, it's just that these are really doing it for me at the mo! Sorry for the verbosity; next time a quote, and then few words!
I do agree with Doylem that reality is better than anything we can invent but I'm taking these photo's to both(hopefully)have a photo that I love and also to create something unique with which to work in different directions.
Here's my first and it's cool if anybody thinks it's pointless or whatever. Honestly!!
By the way, the only post-processing(mostly)is simply a click on Enhance in iPhoto and the odd single click on edge blur and that's it; photoshop soon. Basic technique - me in my girlfriends car, moving, at night(sunset best(blues!!) but rarely get chance), moving camera(which is set on fireworks mode as it's the only way I know to keep shutter open longer on this camera(4 secs). Also, fireworks mode probably 'blows' the colours somewhat which helps for these images.
Finally, love the avian shots Clix Pix.
((*Title of wonderful short story by Mark Helprin))
Like you, I've been doing a few 'abstract' shots; like you, I wonder if there's any skill involved. I suppose the answer is that there can be.
No skill in this shot, though, none at all. While photographing a waterfall, I carried my camera - on the tripod - to another position. Purely by accident, I fired off a couple of frames... and this is one of them. I'm fascinated by the colours, the 'depth', the sinous curves, and I'm trying to find ways to replicate it. No luck yet. Sobering to find that a shot taken by the camera on its own is better than the ones I'm taking...
http://img402.imageshack.us/img402/281/dsc6161iu4.jpg