Taft, Oregon.
![]()
Model: NIKON D50
Exposure: 1/400 sec
Aperture: f/13.0
Focal Length: 200mm w/ Nikkor 55-200 non-VR
Fantastic shot!
I've been to Oregon a few times... It's incredibly beautiful
Taft, Oregon.
![]()
Model: NIKON D50
Exposure: 1/400 sec
Aperture: f/13.0
Focal Length: 200mm w/ Nikkor 55-200 non-VR
I took the kids to the natural history museum yesterday. This was a caveman/mammoth display, there were other human skeletons wielding spears and rocks attacking a large mammoth skeleton. I thought it was funny that they placed this little caveman as getting stepped on by the mammoth, you can still see the expression on his face.
SLC
This tread asking for some constructive criticism got me thinking. Would anyone be interesting in having a daily critique thread? Somewhere to post photos and receive feedback (maybe a rating out of 5). Leaving the photo of the day more for enjoying the excellent photos.
Just a thought, I'll leave it up to regulars to decide if it's a path worth going down.
Fantastic shot!
I've been to Oregon a few times... It's incredibly beautiful.
I like the shot, it conveys a good sense of place, and the bike and guy sitting there sort of tell a little story, perhaps. I'm tempted to say, "straighten it" a bit, because of the tilt to the pole and the buildings, yet the wall by the street seems level enough. I'd play with that a bit. It's a nice shot, and you did a good job cropping. Best advice - keep looking, keep shooting, vary your angles, avoid direct light, have fun
"Cocoon"
D2X+10,5mm
How common is such dress in reality? It looks amazing, and quite comfortable. But am I seeing a holster on the side, and a sheath for a curved blade up front?!That would definitely be a clue for me not to mess with anyone all dressed up like that!
![]()
Lovely mood on this shot (especially from the standpoint of an English winter).
But, for me, the bottom half of the pic adds nothing. If you trim it away, it might 'tighten up' the composition, and accentuate the 'horizontality' of the shot (if that's a word...). And the flare, top left, is a tad distracting. Would this be a candidate for a bit of judicious tinkering in Photoshop? Then stick a frame around it, and hang it on the wall...
BTW, about a separate thread for 'constructive criticism'... I kinda thought this was it. We've had a couple of disagreements in recent days, but really on behalf of other people. That is: I've heard no-one complain that comments about their own photos have been unfair or unkind. Of course, they may have taken offense and simply stopped posting... but I don't think so.
Can we assume that comments are welcome, unless someone specifically says "no comments"??
The comments I have read seem sincere, well-meant and relevant. And, anyway, they're only opinions. No-one needs to take any notice of them...
ha ha we call those 'florida pigeons'.Nice image, seriously. I think the lens flare is a bonus.
Something simple for me today from the yard, testing a lens firmware update...
![]()
Lumix L1+Zuiko Digital 70-300mm 4-5.6
1/250 sec @ f/5.2, ISO 500
226mm
"Cocoon"
![]()
D2X+10,5mm
Me, My Camera, and The Sign
![]()
critiques ?![]()
I just love this shot. The light bouncing off the delicate strands, very nice!
PERFECT!!! Is it an early evening or an early morning?
sometimes light makes marvels.
![]()
Lovely mood on this shot (especially from the standpoint of an English winter).
But, for me, the bottom half of the pic adds nothing. If you trim it away, it might 'tighten up' the composition, and accentuate the 'horizontality' of the shot (if that's a word...). And the flare, top left, is a tad distracting.
Mmh, just my opinion but I really like the sand along the bottom half of the frame... It adds a bit of contrast to the picture, which I like.