Okay I read his review of the X - that is one major kiss ass effort on his behalf . Amazing he could not find any faults
He said it was the most exiting phone upgrade since upgrading from the BlackBerry to the iPhone. He mentioned nothing about either device's camera.Also, he said he was excited about the camera when switching from Blackberry to the original iPhone.
DXO missed the diabolical lens flare of the pixel last year, and still gave it top marks. The outer element on that camera was flush with the back glass on that device, so any bright lights that shined on the glass caused massive lens flare.Surprised they didn’t complain about the pretty severe lensflare though. I hoped that would have been fixed with this iteration of the iPhone. The fake sapphire (combined with layers of glass) is probably the reason for it.
"Previous Plus models, he says, have been "a bit unwieldy" and tough to operate"
I'm shocked a photographer, used to hefty DSLRs and their lenses would ever complain about a phone being "unwieldy".
Just sold my Hasselblad and Phase One cameras!
Might try reading again, I did encounter some issues but definitely my favorite iPhone in a long time.Okay I read his review of the X - that is one major kiss ass effort on his behalf . Amazing he could not find any faults
I actually didn't even think I would use the camera in the original iPhone, thought it was kind of silly! Ha.Lol at a photographer calling a phone unwieldy!
Also, he said he was excited about the camera when switching from Blackberry to the original iPhone. The cameras in early iPhones were really bad and I remember thinking so at the time. As a photographer all he needed was a tiny, pocketable, point ‘n’ shoot if he needed a small camera and he would’ve got vastly superior results.
Speaking for myself, I'm more comfortable handling a dedicated SLR-style-body camera than I am any of the iPhones I've owned for photography—at least for activities beyond general shooting. As someone already mentioned, there's something to be said for a device built, in terms of ergonomics and function, for a specific purpose, even if significantly heavier. The most obvious example which comes to mind is working unusual angles with a proper camera, with relevant settings mapped to intelligently placed buttons and dials, and supports like a strap, vs doing the same with an iPhone using volume buttons or a touchscreen to shoot).
Compared to the Canons and Nikons I've used before and the Olympus I use now (building on the same basic SLR-style body and ergonomics) I still feel like my iPhone X (and prior smartphones) are relatively 'unwieldy' for photography. But the iPhone is at least always with me. Not to dismiss it, though: I'm excited for it's potential in terms of photography, and impressed as hell about how it intelligently handles problems like a scene with wide dynamic range. I wish traditional camera makers would develop more resources into further developing such software capabilities (hell, I'd be happy just to see material progress in image sharing).
"Previous Plus models, he says, have been "a bit unwieldy" and tough to operate"
I'm shocked a photographer, used to hefty DSLRs and their lenses would ever complain about a phone being "unwieldy".
Man, if I return my X Along with AppleCare I can buy a Leica lens.......
[doublepost=1510009018][/doublepost]
I'm sure you would write a review of pros/cons. If you read his reviews.... seems very biased to me, and even worse, whatever is the newest is the greatest....
Man, if I return my X Along with AppleCare I can buy a Leica lens.......
[doublepost=1510009018][/doublepost]
I'm sure you would write a review of pros/cons. If you read his reviews.... seems very biased to me, and even worse, whatever is the newest is the greatest....
HA! Please don't rid yourself of your DSLR -- there's a place for bothDamn, I just bought an 800$ lens, I could have added a few more hundred and saved the hassle to carry a D-SLR... oh, wait, I might buy this guy's one, I am sure he'll get rid of his one once he got a (probably free) iPhoneX ;-)
I haven't gotten to play with it yet, but DxO scores are way up there… excited to see it soon.Hmm, I was under the impression that the Pixel 2 takes better photos than the iPhone X.![]()
Maybe, but who cares.Hmm, I was under the impression that the Pixel 2 takes better photos than the iPhone X.![]()
Looking at those photos on a 15" screen really showed how bad the camera actually is compared to professional cameras. Just take a look at that bike photo in full screen.
Any photo in a 4X6 format shot on a phone will look OK in that format, you are cramming 10 pounds of crap into a 3 pound jar. The day they start shooting images that can be blown up to poster size without degradation will be the day I switch. The picture itself is as good as the photographer, composition, lighting, etc.... the image on paper cannot be compared to my D3X when it needs to be poster size and sharp. These camera's are for selfies and recording moments in time and they do that job quite well.
The same procedure as every year - some days after iPhone release, the latest iPhone camera was proven by a photographer as the best one...
Hmm, I was under the impression that the Pixel 2 takes better photos than the iPhone X.![]()
Maybe, but who cares.
For reference, you might be interested in my iPhone 8 Plus review (my recommendation was to wait for X and I mentioned a few challenges I had with it.) http://austinmann.com/trek/iphone-8-camera-review-india
I really love the X and think it's the best iPhone in a long time.
[doublepost=1510015265][/doublepost]
For reference, you might be interested in my iPhone 8 Plus review (my recommendation was to wait for X and I mentioned a few challenges I had with it.) http://austinmann.com/trek/iphone-8-camera-review-india
I really love the X and think it's the best iPhone in a long time.
[doublepost=1510015410][/doublepost]
HA! Please don't rid yourself of your DSLR -- there's a place for both
[doublepost=1510015463][/doublepost]
I haven't gotten to play with it yet, but DxO scores are way up there… excited to see it soon.
And yet every picture I ever take since the iPhone 6 looks like a watercolor painting with crazy noise artifacts everywhere no matter how bright the light is.
Looking at those photos on a 15" screen really showed how bad the camera actually is compared to professional cameras. Just take a look at that bike photo in full screen.
Speaking for myself, I'm more comfortable handling a dedicated SLR-style-body camera than I am any of the iPhones I've owned for photography—at least for activities beyond general shooting. As someone already mentioned, there's something to be said for a device built, in terms of ergonomics and function, for a specific purpose, even if significantly heavier. The most obvious example which comes to mind is working unusual angles with a proper camera, with relevant settings mapped to intelligently placed buttons and dials, and supports like a strap, vs doing the same with an iPhone using volume buttons or a touchscreen to shoot).
Compared to the Canons and Nikons I've used before and the Olympus I use now (building on the same basic SLR-style body and ergonomics) I still feel like my iPhone X (and prior smartphones) are relatively 'unwieldy' for photography. But the iPhone is at least always with me. Not to dismiss it, though: I'm excited for it's potential in terms of photography, and thoroughly impressed by its intelligent handling of problems like a scene with wide dynamic range. I wish traditional camera makers would put more resources into further developing such software capabilities (hell, I'd be happy just to see material progress in image sharing).
"Previous Plus models, he says, have been "a bit unwieldy" and tough to operate"
I'm shocked a photographer, used to hefty DSLRs and their lenses would ever complain about a phone being "unwieldy".