Photography is...

Discussion in 'Digital Photography' started by Everythingisnt, May 19, 2008.

  1. Everythingisnt macrumors 6502a

    Everythingisnt

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2008
    Location:
    Vancouver
    #1
    (ex: ) 0.0005% gear, 69.0005% skill, 30% hard work :).


    Post your breakdowns here..
     
  2. shecky Guest

    shecky

    Joined:
    May 24, 2003
    Location:
    Obviously you're not a golfer.
    #2
    99.5% the mind and eye of the photographer

    0.5% gear.
     
  3. Chrispy88 macrumors member

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2008
    #3
    Photography is absolutely not 50% gear. I agree with the above poster :)
     
  4. Techguy172 macrumors 68000

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2007
    Location:
    Ontario Canada
    #4
    More of it is eye than gear I'm not sure I agree with shecky however it's a lot less than 50%
     
  5. JNB macrumors 604

    JNB

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2004
    Location:
    In a Hell predominately of my own making
    #5
    (Excluding studio work)
    1% gear,
    2% photographer,
    3% right time, right place,
    94% sheer effin' luck.
     
  6. Everythingisnt thread starter macrumors 6502a

    Everythingisnt

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2008
    Location:
    Vancouver
    #6
    I didn't start this thread to start an argument.. jeez... Can't you see the part where I say "EXAMPLE"?
     
  7. RaceTripper macrumors 68030

    Joined:
    May 29, 2007
    #7
    Well, I do motorsports so I agree with it being more luck than anything. For a race event (where I get 2000-4000 shots) I would say less than 5% of my pictures are salvageable and I really like less than 1-2% of them. Having good gear is nice, but it means nothing if you don't have the artistry, luck, and technique.
     
  8. PkennethV macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2006
    Location:
    Toronto
    #8
    I'd say gear can mean quite a lot -- certainly more than 1% if it helps you create what you want. But gear does matter less that 1% if you are not good.
     
  9. compuwar macrumors 601

    compuwar

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2006
    Location:
    Northern/Central VA
    #9
    It depends so much on the type of photography that you can't really quantify it in general...

    Nature photography, street photography and sports photography have a fairly good-sized luck component, and a large experience/skill component too. Portrait photography has a lot less luck, and a lot more skill and lighting equipment. Wedding photography is a lot skill and a little luck (or absence of bad luck perhaps.) Product photography is almost pure skill, with some equipment...

    Skill substitutes for equipment in many cases, equipment substitutes for skill in fewer cases, but probably more strongly in the cases where it does.

    (This isn't meant to be personal, it just reminds me of something...)

    I've always said you can tell a good photographer by the pictures they *don't* take.

    I think it may be more indicative of the LF or MF stuff where you have to slow down and pay attention, but I find that if I'm in serious mode, I take a lot fewer shots because I know when I've got it- where I'll go to spray and pray in situations where I'm further from my comfort zone.

    My number of salable images tend to be about the same either way, but the percentages change a lot.
     
  10. Everythingisnt thread starter macrumors 6502a

    Everythingisnt

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2008
    Location:
    Vancouver
    #10
    Well, if you don't have a camera you can't exactly take any pictures now can you...
     
  11. bobt macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2006
    Location:
    Michigan
    #11
    It's the indian, not the arrow

    That being said, the photographer makes his or her "luck". Putting one in situations with good light and such is the name of the game.
     
  12. gkarris macrumors 604

    gkarris

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2004
    Location:
    "No escape from Reality..."
  13. SLC Flyfishing Suspended

    SLC Flyfishing

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2007
    Location:
    Portland, OR
    #13
    Photography is.......

    A terribly expensive and time consuming addiction!

    Seriously though, it's about 40% skill (knowledge), 40% a good eye for composition, with about 8% luck and the other 2% can be argued over :D

    SLC
     
  14. AxisOfBeagles macrumors 6502

    AxisOfBeagles

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2008
    Location:
    East of Shangrila
    #14
    It's not a static proportion. The better the photographer, the more gear makes a difference.

    The inverse also holds true - the less proficient the photographer, the less gear makes a difference.

    In all cases, hard work (and time) make a huge difference.
     
  15. JNB macrumors 604

    JNB

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2004
    Location:
    In a Hell predominately of my own making
    #15
    Perhaps I should've paraphased Yogi Berra and said that photography is 90% skill, the other half is luck.
     
  16. 66217 Guest

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2006
    #16
    Good eye and dedication are the most important ingredients. But having good equipment is also important in some cases.

    For instance, many photos seen at the Photo of the Day thread would have been impossible without a SLR camera.
     
  17. RaceTripper macrumors 68030

    Joined:
    May 29, 2007
    #17
    For motorsports, 1000 pictures a day really isn't that much if you are shooting the entire day. With a car moving at 140MPH or more, you have to pan it for 10 shots or so. That adds up quickly. I don't see the pros taking less than I do.

    I don't see how it matters that I take more shots. It's the result that counts.
    http://racetripper.com/petit07/
    http://racetripper.com/sebring08/
     
  18. termina3 macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2007
    Location:
    TX
  19. nathanbookpro macrumors member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2008
    Location:
    ostraylia
  20. iBlue macrumors Core

    iBlue

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2005
    Location:
    London, England
    #20
    ...often so damn pretentious...

    ... but I'm just jealous and clueless. :p
     
  21. TuffLuffJimmy macrumors G3

    TuffLuffJimmy

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2007
    Location:
    Portland, OR
    #21
    You really believe that skill, subject matter and equipment mean nothing?
     
  22. terriyaki macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2005
    Location:
    Vancouver
  23. atari1356 macrumors 68000

    atari1356

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2004
    #23
    A quote I read recently:

     
  24. mcarnes macrumors 68000

    mcarnes

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2004
    Location:
    USA! USA!
    #24
    ...for people with obsessive compulsive disorders.
     
  25. theblueone macrumors member

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2007
    #25
    My photography teacher made a joke about photojournalism once:
    90% showing up
    8% f:8
    2% skill and everything else

    Of course it wasn't meant to be disparaging to photojournalism. It was just to show how important unexpected shots tend to be to any given photojournalist's body of work.
     

Share This Page