Photography Pros Review the iPhone 5's Camera

Discussion in 'iOS Blog Discussion' started by MacRumors, Oct 2, 2012.

  1. MacRumors macrumors bot


    Apr 12, 2001

    Photography site has published a lengthy review of the iPhone 5's camera. Last year, famed photographer Annie Leibovitz called the iPhone "the snapshot camera of today", and the iPhone has been the most popular camera on Flickr for years.


    The full review is worth a read, but this excerpt looks at interesting questions about the future of casual photography and how the simple "camera phone" has revolutionized both the mobile phone and camera industries.
    Article Link: Photography Pros Review the iPhone 5's Camera
  2. jrfive0 macrumors member

    Mar 22, 2011
    Still doesn't seem reason enough to upgrade from the 4s.....
  3. kjs862 macrumors 65816


    Jan 21, 2004
    I've been a reader of dpreview for years. They publish very credible info.
  4. QCassidy352 macrumors G4


    Mar 20, 2003
    Bay Area
    For this one reason alone? Clearly not. For everything combined? Easy worth an upgrade.
  5. RoboCop001 macrumors 65816

    Oct 4, 2005
    Toronto, Canada
  6. mrjamieb macrumors newbie

    Feb 1, 2012
    Not if you're a photographer :/
  7. rorschach macrumors 68020


    Jul 27, 2003
    True but lots of people who bought a 3GS or 4 are up for renewal, so it would be more of an upgrade for them.
  8. CBJammin103 macrumors regular


    Jun 6, 2007
    Louisiana, United States
    For the photography snobs: The best camera is the one you have with you, and any shot you take is better than one you didn't.

    For the phone camera supporters: A phone camera will never compare to a same-gen DSLR. Period, end of story.

    The iPhone is simply a different tool than a traditional camera. It's nice that the iPhone 5 camera is solid, but I don't see how this is a paradigm shift any more than the previous iPhone cameras.

    I WILL say that the iPhone has totally replaced a point-n-shoot for my purposes.
  9. nsfw macrumors regular

    Aug 21, 2009
    no not from the 4S.. but if you had a 4 and its gone through two years of home button mashing, then you probably want to upgrade.
  10. Paco43 macrumors newbie

    Feb 17, 2012
    Video's will not open in , Adobe, Streamclip and QuickTime . Fine with 5.1, not in 6.0!
  11. canadianpj macrumors 6502

    Jun 27, 2008
    Given the "purple" issue if I had not sold my 4S I would have gone back to it. It is not a matter of simply avoiding pointing directly at the sun, etc. Go try to take photos at a football game at an indoor stadium and try not to have purple all over your photos.
  12. Whatsit macrumors newbie

    Sep 21, 2012
    Columbus, OH
    That's the paradigm shift, IMO. Sometime in the last couple of years I stopped even bothering to bring my point-and-shoot with me to events. When I first got an iPhone (the 4 was my first smartphone) I'd make sure to bring the "real camera" with me to important events. I don't do that anymore and at this point will probably not be purchasing any more point-and-shoot cameras.

    The iPhone camera (and other smartphone cameras) certainly won't replace DSLRs, but they will replace the basic low-to-mid-range point-and-shoots that a lot of people used to consider their primary camera.
  13. porky macrumors regular

    Oct 12, 2003
    I have a 4s and ordered the iPhone 5 for the better camera ... Especially in low light.
  14. powaking macrumors 6502


    Jul 3, 2008
    I have a DSLR but on our recent trip to Disney we used an iPhone 4 and 4S for all of our picture taking and for the most part they were satisfactory. Even when we printed them out at 4x6. Each tool serves its purpose and for a trip to Disney it definitely served its purpose over a DSLR.
  15. nostaws macrumors 6502


    Jan 14, 2006
  16. cvaldes macrumors 68040

    Dec 14, 2006
    somewhere else

    When I bought my iPhone 4S, it replaced three devices: dumbphone, iPod touch (4th generation with its lousy camera), and a solid Canon point-and-shoot camera.

    I still keep my Canon PowerShot around, just in case I'm in a sketchy photo situation (like taking pictures from a kayak) or the few situations when I really need to use optical zoom.
  17. Geckotek macrumors G3


    Jul 22, 2008
    Pretty sure that was not the purpose.
  18. Mundty, Oct 2, 2012
    Last edited: Oct 2, 2012

    Mundty macrumors member

    May 7, 2012
    The thing about using a DSLR is they've come so far down in price, that practically anyone can own one now. I think that's a good thing in most regards, but you still have inexperienced photographers walking around not really knowing how to properly use a DSLR. And that's when you see people start using an iPhone as a replacement for a professional camera.

    The iPhone can take very nice pictures, but the degree of control you have with a DSLR is something you cannot accomplish with an iPhone. Sure the iPhone can simulate some basic manual controls, but if you decide the picture you just took needs adjustment that cannot be accomplished in PP, you have very little options at your disposal. Not to mention, the increments and sensitivity between each adjustment is like the difference between using a hammer and a fine chisel.

    I'm not trying to demean your choice to bring an iPhone instead of a DSLR on vacation. But if you want to "wow" people with your vacation photos... an iPhone is not the right tool. Not to mention any decent printer and/or lcd monitor is going to reveal stark differences between a APS-C/FullFrame sensor and the tiny sensor found in an iPhone
  19. shurcooL macrumors 6502a

    Jan 24, 2011
    Basically this.

    The iPhone 5 is nice, but it doesn't come even close to the DSLR. Not that I expect it to.
  20. John.B macrumors 601


    Jan 15, 2008
    Holocene Epoch
    Appreciation for good photography automatically makes someone a snob?

    It doesn't need to, it only needs to fill the gap where a full-sized rig is too much to carry.
  21. BJMRamage macrumors 68020


    Oct 2, 2007
    I think we purchased a P&S either right before or right after our first iPhone 4 (smartphone) purchase. But we decided to buy a waterproof/shockproof camera instead of a regular P&S.

    We have:
    2 DLSRs (one is infrared)
    2 iPhones
    1 underwater/P&S
    1 old regular P&S that might not be used again.

    I have a camera for almost any situation. I wont always carry them all. but these phones capture the moments nicely and sometimes that's what counts.

    still love the DSLR but one hand iPhone shooting can be a bit easier.
  22. Arcsylver macrumors member

    Oct 6, 2011
    Chicago, IL
    I'm not surprised at the flare or the purple considering that the lens is covered by that nice piece of sapphire to protect the lens.

    This is going to happen when you cover a lens element with anything. It isa common issue when using filters as well when shooting with a bright light source in the frame. The solution is simple. Shoot while hooding the lens or don't shoot with bright lights in the frame.

    Been around since cameras were invented.
  23. mdelvecchio macrumors 68040


    Sep 3, 2010
    youre not supposed to. durrr. normal people dont upgrade iOS devices annually. get it thru your head.
  24. nsayer, Oct 2, 2012
    Last edited: Oct 2, 2012

    nsayer macrumors 6502a


    Jan 23, 2003
    Silicon Valley
    Ok, I don't get DSLRs anymore. I firmly believe they are fundamentally obsolete.

    Once upon a time, the recording medium for photography was light-sensitive emulsions. They had to be kept in the dark until they were developed except for exposure. So a camera was a box that held the film in a plane in front of a shutter that briefly exposed the film to the subject/scene.

    The problem was that in a traditional design, you could not offer the photographer the exact same view that the film got, because of the requirement to keep the film dark until capture. For cheap cameras, the solution was a viewfinder, which offered a good-enough facsimile for what the film would see.

    SLRs were the solution to this problem. In front of the shutter was a movable 45 degree angle mirror. Before the shutter would trip, the mirror would snap upwards out of the way. At other times, the mirror sent the image that was going through the lens upwards into a prism and out the viewfinder. Thus, the photographer could see *exactly* what the film would see.

    There's absolutely no reason for this if the image capture material is a CCD. The "viewfinder" on an iPhone shows exactly what the final captured image is going to be (modulo resolution), because it is displaying exactly what the CCD is capturing. It's, in fact, better than a traditional SLR, because you don't have to hold the camera up to your eye to see through the lens!

    So if a DSLR is named that because it retains the mirror-prism-viewfinder system, then that is a ridiculous anachronism that does nothing but raise the price needlessly. If, instead, people call high end digital cameras "DSLRs" because of some professional level feature-set, or a better sensor, or because they lack a built-in phone or some such, then perhaps we need a better term for it.

Share This Page