Photos - Do you rename your pictures?

conamor

macrumors 6502
Original poster
Jun 27, 2013
335
19
Good day,

Do you keep the default name for your picture? DSC_12345.JPG or .RAW

Or you always change the name for the session you took? 2015_summer_1stime_pool_baby_001.JPG?

Thanks
 

Apple fanboy

macrumors Westmere
Feb 21, 2012
37,235
26,299
Behind the Lens, UK
Good day,

Do you keep the default name for your picture? DSC_12345.JPG or .RAW

Or you always change the name for the session you took? 2015_summer_1stime_pool_baby_001.JPG?

Thanks
I don't use Photos, but in LR I use file number and date. Then use key wording as well. The key wording is the easiest way to locate your pictures with a larger library.
 

ricosuave

macrumors 6502
Mar 27, 2007
385
13
In front of my mac
Good day,

Do you keep the default name for your picture? DSC_12345.JPG or .RAW

Or you always change the name for the session you took? 2015_summer_1stime_pool_baby_001.JPG?

Thanks
I use cameramodel_date_time_originalname.JPG

This way the finder doesn't give you issues with same file names.
 

robgendreau

macrumors 68040
Jul 13, 2008
3,349
261
I use cameramodel_date_time_originalname.JPG

This way the finder doesn't give you issues with same file names.
I'm with fanboy; I never rename and use keyword and other metadata for organization. Since I copy to date-based folders I don't have to worry about name collisions, and using the camera-generated filenames allows me to sort in sequence when the shots were made on the same second. It just seems to make things easier than messing with a renaming system.

If you use something like Lightroom or Bridge that can do hierarchical keywords, that's even better than file renaming for storing info. Remember that the date and time and a bunch of other info is already stored in the exif or IPTC metadata; no need to duplicate info like creation date in the filename.
 

ricosuave

macrumors 6502
Mar 27, 2007
385
13
In front of my mac
I'm with fanboy; I never rename and use keyword and other metadata for organization. Since I copy to date-based folders I don't have to worry about name collisions, and using the camera-generated filenames allows me to sort in sequence when the shots were made on the same second. It just seems to make things easier than messing with a renaming system.

If you use something like Lightroom or Bridge that can do hierarchical keywords, that's even better than file renaming for storing info. Remember that the date and time and a bunch of other info is already stored in the exif or IPTC metadata; no need to duplicate info like creation date in the filename.
Renaming files also makes offline backups easier. You can instantly see what file is backed up.
 

Ray2

macrumors 6502a
Jul 8, 2014
692
149
I only rename what gets published. Event description + sequence. Keeps them in whatever order I choose, wherever they go (other than Apple which appears to recognize disorder). Use keywording extensively.
 
Last edited:

bgd

macrumors regular
Aug 30, 2005
237
11
SG
Using LR I rename on import. Pix_date_sequence#.dng. Ideally I'd like the sequence number to reset each day but haven't worked out how to do that. Like others I use key words to find photos, file name isn't relevant, just needs to be unique.
 

Cheese&Apple

macrumors 68010
Jun 5, 2012
2,004
6,604
Toronto
I don't rename my files and suggest that's it's a personal preference thing that really doesn't matter provided:

- you're naming syntax is consistant for all shots, and
- your primary file names match your back-up file names.

~ Peter
 

Keebler

macrumors 68030
Jun 20, 2005
2,944
191
Canada
I don't use Photos, but in LR I use file number and date. Then use key wording as well. The key wording is the easiest way to locate your pictures with a larger library.
I follow what Fanboy does - I rename the files by year - month - date then sequential # ie.

2015-10-30_01 etc...

I also add in keywords and metadata then save those right back to the original files so they are changed forever.

The reason for that is software will always change, but at least the base files will have the right information.

I had Aperture 1.0 crash a long time ago and much of the organization was gone. Any software can have that issue, but if you have the base files with the right info and backed up, then it's a lot easier to get back up to speed.

Plus, if I ever want to share files with friends/relatives, the files are ready go.

Then backed up weekly in double and every few months in triplicate to hard drives stored in a bank safety deposit box.

Currently using Aperture for this as Photos doesn't (yet? maybe never?) have the same features.

But if you use LR, Aperture or CaptureOne, the absolute beauty is the organization based on those keywords.

Example: my son had a project requiring specific family photographs.

Within a minute or 2, I had smart albums set up so he could scroll through and find the ones he needed.

Easy peasy.

A lot of work? Absolutely lol ALOT :)

Good luck!
 

Designer Dale

macrumors 68040
Mar 25, 2009
3,950
100
Folding space
When I still had access to Aperture, I named my Projects by date followed by an identifying name like June 16 2015 NOLA. Then I could find my photos from New Orleans as long as I remembered even just the month or year. My file names tend to be trippy and I don't like to rely on that. For stuff that I publish I name the files by the event or place in a way that conveys info to the random viewer. In the case of the drag race photos I had been doing, I gave the files names to identify the drivers and classes of the cars. A lot of photographers who post to racing sites don't do this and it bothers me that they don't give the drivers credit.

Dale (Lost in PC land)
 

HDFan

macrumors 68020
Jun 30, 2007
2,277
613
I rename my photos by Country (or event)/Dates (or date) traveled/Camera Prefix/original index from camera, e.g.

Japan 2015.09.13-2015.10.03 I6+_1346

All are stored in a folder with the Country/Date name, e.g. Japan 2015.09.13-2015.10.03

This way I can easily find all pictures from all Japan trips and searches and utilities that bring up 20 IMG_0015 files don't happen.

For iPhone pictures since IMG means nothing I rename it to the specific model as the camera's change. For other cameras when it is distinctive (such as Sony's DSC or Panasonic's P) I leave the original prefix. This makes it very easy to find shots from a particular camera in the finder.

I leave the original index on just in case I've missed something as I'm processing things in Lightroom. It makes it very easy for me to go back and find a missing photo from the SD card.
 

monokakata

macrumors 68000
May 8, 2008
1,895
414
Ithaca, NY
I rename mine the way Keebler does (2015 11 06 001) upon import (I use Nikon Transfer for that). Each day's shooting is in a folder with the date as its name.

But every so often I create a folder with a name like "2015 11 06 CF dump" and transfer all the image files currently in the camera into it, with their original names. I keep those folders on another disk (where the renamed ones are also backed up).
 

caprica21

macrumors member
Sep 9, 2014
54
4
Good day,

Do you keep the default name for your picture? DSC_12345.JPG or .RAW

Or you always change the name for the session you took? 2015_summer_1stime_pool_baby_001.JPG?

Thanks
It's a personal preference whether you want to rename photos or not. For last 7-8 years while using Photoshop Elements, Apple Photos and bunch of other software, I never found any benefits of renaming files - primarily because image itself stores EXIF information (See exception case below). Any decent photo organizer will be able to find your photo based on EXIF data including date/time/location and keywords you set.

I always organize my photos based on categories (in Finder as folder names). Example:
Personal - For all personal photos including Birthdays/Anniversary, etc
Portfolio - For all my personal work related photos
Clients - For all billable photos
Places - For places I visit like NYC-Statue of Liberty, Niagara Falls, etc
etc

Below is my folder name format
<Category>/<Event> YYYYMMDD

Example:
Places/Niagara Falls 20140526/*

This way you can quickly go to particular event photos without even opening photo software (if required)

Having said this, I got in trouble recently (after I decided to clean install El Capitan). Because I also decided to re-create entire photo library / catalog as I wanted to trash photos that are not required as it was taking too much disk space (I have over 300 GB photos currently). While shuffling through photos I ended up cluttering files as many file names were same. I later found out that if you have photos from different sources (iPhone6, iPhone4, Sony DSLR, Canon DSLR, etc), you may end up having same file name.

So in such cases, I would recommend to make one camera as primary for which you will not change file names (Example: My primary Canon DSLR which I use 90% of photos). For all others rename based on source (Mostly iPhone for casual photography).
 

ChrisA

macrumors G4
Jan 5, 2006
11,646
455
Redondo Beach, California
Do you keep the default name for your picture? DSC_12345.JPG or .RAW.
I never look at the file name. So I never see the need to change it. But there is one exception. If I export the file to send to someone else I change it to be descriptive.

The photo library software (Aperture, Photos, LR or whatever) allows you to name or caption the photo and add keywords. This is far more useful than changing the file name.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.