Photos in El Capitan will include third party editing tools!

Discussion in 'Digital Photography' started by HarryPot, Jun 8, 2015.

  1. HarryPot macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2009
    #1
    I've been using Photos lately, and I've come to like it.

    Obviously, the one shortcoming of Photos is the editing tools compared to Aperture/Lightroom.

    But in El Capitan, Photos will now be able to handle their party editing tools:

    Hopefully we will see soon the upcoming third party tools from some developers.
     
  2. MCAsan macrumors 601

    MCAsan

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2012
    Location:
    Atlanta
    #2
    It will be interesting is how Metal can improve the graphics side of photo processing apps like LR, PS, and the existing plugins. Apple made some reference to Adobe getting better performance with some of their apps. LR and PS where not mentioned. Just maybe we will get CC updates in the fall to maximize the use of Metal graphics engine. We will see if Adobe, Topaz, Nik, OnOne and others do Photos plugins this year.

     
  3. frazzm737 macrumors regular

    frazzm737

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2007
    Location:
    Arvada, Colorado
    #3
    I think the new Photos app is off to a good start. It will never replace the sophisticated, expensive photo programs, but for the average user, it should fill the bill. I expect we will see many improvements to the app as time goes on.
     
  4. xStep macrumors 68000

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2003
    Location:
    Less lost in L.A.
    #4
    The Adobe guy mentioned supporting CC apps with Metal and did mention Photoshop. They did a demo that was showed the impressive performance gain. Can't remember which keynote that was in.
     
  5. Zaqfalcon macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2010
    #5
    How about an 'all the stuff I used to be able to do with Aperture but can't in Photos' plugin?
     
  6. BJMRamage macrumors 68020

    BJMRamage

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2007
    #6
    I've said that from the beginning when Photos was announced and found out to be short of Aperture.
    I'd pay for an in-app purchase of "Aperture-Tools" for Photos. Until that point I am still using Aperture.
     
  7. robgendreau macrumors 68030

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2008
    #7
    Photos isn't Aperture and won't ever be, but you might get some of the tools you used in Aperture. Someday. Maybe. Just depends what was useful to you. If not, keep using Aperture and transition to any of the many alternatives that aren't Photos.
     
  8. anewman143 macrumors regular

    anewman143

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2008
    #8
    My reading of this suggest that the extensions have to come via the app store - so what about those of us who, for example, have paid for the Nik/Google suite? We gonna have to pay again through the app store to get this functionality? Google has been pretty tight-lipped about it to date...
     
  9. OreoCookie macrumors 68030

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2001
    Location:
    Sendai, Japan
    #9
    Adobe demoed two of their apps (Illustrator and After Effects, I believe), and nebulously mentioned that they'll adopt Metal in all of their CC apps. To what extent and when is another question, though.

    It'd be curious to see whether Photos Extensions can actually be used as universal plugins of sorts in other apps. That'd really be great and open the door for a lot of interesting things. Just imagine if you can run Photos Extensions also in Photoshop or Affinity Photo …
     
  10. MCAsan macrumors 601

    MCAsan

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2012
    Location:
    Atlanta
    #10
    I can see Photos and iPhoto before it for handling snapshots from IOS devices. But if someone was a serious photographer and used Aperture in the past, they need to more on. Photos is no Aperture, even with extensions. Move on to Lightroom, Capture 1 Pro, or other post processing toolset.
     
  11. maflynn Moderator

    maflynn

    Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2009
    Location:
    Boston
    #11
    I can't answer first hand about Photos since I don't use it, but I do see a lot of threads in the app forum bemoaning all sorts of issues. Perhaps my perspective is skewed but I'm not all that sure Photos is off to a good start.

    Adding plugin/extensions will be a good move on their part but it will never be a product for the more serious photographer imo.
     
  12. OreoCookie macrumors 68030

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2001
    Location:
    Sendai, Japan
    #12
    I don't think this is necessarily true: in a two years or so if Apple keeps on iterating with Photos it could very well cover the needs of quite a few enthusiasts (assuming that sufficiently many Photos Extensions become available and Apple keeps on iterating on the functionality). I don't think it'll ever cover the needs of many professionals, but I definitely think it'll extend well beyond the realm of people taking photos with their iPhone, I know quite a few people whose focus lies with editing rather than organization. (That's not me, by the way.)
     
  13. OreoCookie macrumors 68030

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2001
    Location:
    Sendai, Japan
    #13
    From what I can tell most of the moaning came from (former) Aperture users such as myself. I think former iPhoto users are served well with Photos.
     
  14. maflynn Moderator

    maflynn

    Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2009
    Location:
    Boston
    #14
    It could be, I've read some of the threads but since I am not using Photos, I cannot provide any aide.
     
  15. MCAsan, Jun 21, 2015
    Last edited: Jun 21, 2015

    MCAsan macrumors 601

    MCAsan

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2012
    Location:
    Atlanta
    #15

    So for the two years of so needed for Photos to get somewhere, are photographers just supposed to wait patiently and not take photos? Will the competitors, just sit and wait for Apple to catch up? On both counts, I don't think so. Apple might have serious competition from Google over the snapshot marketplace.
     
  16. OreoCookie macrumors 68030

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2001
    Location:
    Sendai, Japan
    #16
    I don't think the competition on the iOS and Mac platform is very serious, and that for the vast majority of users Photos is a bad app. It doesn't need another 2 years to be useful, I wrote that it needs some more time until it's enticing to users who want simple organizational tools but advanced editing tools. To me this seems like a combination that's attractive to quite a few people who are more serious about photography.

    I have the impression that you're just viewing this from the perspective of someone for whom Photos (or, in fact, any Photos-class app) does not meet his or her needs. (It surely doesn't satisfy mine. I'll probably use it occasionally to make greeting cards, calendars and manage the photos on my iPhone.)

    Google has a big hurdle to overcome, namely that it isn't installed by default and doesn't integrate as well into Apple's ecosystem. Even Google Maps hasn't surpassed Apple Maps as the most popular navigation app on iOS — despite the fact that Google Maps is superior in most circumstances. The biggest appeal of Google Photos is that it is cross-platform in my opinion, this is the hook that gets most installations I think. Average people don't have a clue what Google Photos offers them.
     

Share This Page