Are there any significant differences between these two versions? I mainly work with digital photos.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Photoshop CS vs. 7.0
- Thread starter bigboy99
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Of particular interest for photographers:
The file browser is significantly better than under PS7
Improved support for 16-bit images
Camera RAW plugins
Plus a number of new and improved tools... I won't go on because I just found this article which goes into far more detail than I ever could.
The file browser is significantly better than under PS7
Improved support for 16-bit images
Camera RAW plugins
Plus a number of new and improved tools... I won't go on because I just found this article which goes into far more detail than I ever could.
G5Unit
macrumors 68020
I have PS 7 because the higher the versions go, the more ram they hog. I stick with PS 7 and After Effects 6.5 because I can have them both open at the same time without slowdowns. The reason I upgraded to 6.5 from 6.0 was because of some cross platform problem and they didnt have 6 no more so I bought 6.5 from 99 bucks. I think you should only get CS 2 if there is a feature you really need to make your productivity better.
xsedrinam
macrumors 601
I've just installed CS2 ( PS 9), benefit of xmas gift, so haven't had a chance to compare (vs. 8,7), but the "healing brush" seems to have added a couple more features "red eye" among them which has been over due, imo, though iPhoto and other apps have addressed this to a degree.maya said:
OutThere
macrumors 603
From what I've heard, CS2 doesn't offer much over CS1, so there's no point in upgrading there if you don't want to.
I've found CS to be much cleaner than 7, and there are several improvements, one of which being the healing brush (very useful in touching up portraits), and some other basic interface and file management stuff that just makes the whole process smoother.
I've found CS to be much cleaner than 7, and there are several improvements, one of which being the healing brush (very useful in touching up portraits), and some other basic interface and file management stuff that just makes the whole process smoother.
Flying Llama
macrumors 6502a
Isn't there the healing brush in PS7?? 😕
I've been using PS7 for the past four years and plan to upgrade to CS2 soon...
I've been using PS7 for the past four years and plan to upgrade to CS2 soon...
Chacala_Nayarit
macrumors 6502
I have compared 7 and 8. Version 8 has some cool filters and improved file browser, but no reasons for me to upgrade. I mainly work with digital photos for the Web.
The interface is more user friendly in CS than 7, in my opinion. We use PS 7 at school, but I've worked with both CS and CS2 at home.
What CS has that 7 doesn't (things I notice and use often):
-Type on a path - draw a path and place type on it. 7 can't do this.
-Filter gallery makes things a lot easier.
CS2 seems to provide more filters and better RAW handling. Plus, Adobe Bridge is a lot faster than the File Browser.
What CS has that 7 doesn't (things I notice and use often):
-Type on a path - draw a path and place type on it. 7 can't do this.
-Filter gallery makes things a lot easier.
CS2 seems to provide more filters and better RAW handling. Plus, Adobe Bridge is a lot faster than the File Browser.
MRU
macrumors Penryn
I've upgraded my photoshop since Ver 5.
The big difference fo me in 7 - CS(8) was things like the filter browser. It's handy.
The interface and layer options have some enhancements.
Admtedly there isn't a giant leap but 8 is very good and stable. I like File Browser. Its really useful fast and responsive.
CS2 sucks ass. They ruined photoshop, it seems to have memory holes, is sluggish.
With both 7 & CS I hardly ever saw the spinning wheel of death, even when a project amassed a large number of layers.
With CS2 it stops up on you and SPOD is seen very often, even when selecting somthing fairly simple like a text layer.
After paying for the upgrade from CS - CS2 I feel really pis*ed off at Adobe. Even fantastic FileBrowser from CS has been replaced with Adobe Bridge 1. An extremely slow and labourious program. The benefit of file browser was its speed, take that away and over complicate somthing unecessarily and hey presto you have Bridge.
Also Version Cue sucks ass, its like spyware attaching itself to the top menu bar and monitoring you. What a waste of resources.
7 - 8 worth it. 7 or 8(CS) to 9(CS2) CRAP.
The big difference fo me in 7 - CS(8) was things like the filter browser. It's handy.
The interface and layer options have some enhancements.
Admtedly there isn't a giant leap but 8 is very good and stable. I like File Browser. Its really useful fast and responsive.
CS2 sucks ass. They ruined photoshop, it seems to have memory holes, is sluggish.
With both 7 & CS I hardly ever saw the spinning wheel of death, even when a project amassed a large number of layers.
With CS2 it stops up on you and SPOD is seen very often, even when selecting somthing fairly simple like a text layer.
After paying for the upgrade from CS - CS2 I feel really pis*ed off at Adobe. Even fantastic FileBrowser from CS has been replaced with Adobe Bridge 1. An extremely slow and labourious program. The benefit of file browser was its speed, take that away and over complicate somthing unecessarily and hey presto you have Bridge.
Also Version Cue sucks ass, its like spyware attaching itself to the top menu bar and monitoring you. What a waste of resources.
7 - 8 worth it. 7 or 8(CS) to 9(CS2) CRAP.
I have used all the versions of PS (from 1 to CS2) and my long time favorite was PS7. Now with a Quad, PS7 runs like crap so I'm using CS1 which I find to be great also. There are some features in CS2 that I like a lot, namely HDR editing, the Warp Deformer and Smart Objects. But to me CS2 does not seem as stable as PS7 or CS1 so I will more than likely use CS1 most of the time.