I hope they hurry...
http://www.reuters.com/article/blog...l6Y&bbParentWidgetId=B82x9Ksc5UNVzDjpITcIrRbi
http://www.reuters.com/article/blog...l6Y&bbParentWidgetId=B82x9Ksc5UNVzDjpITcIrRbi
I can't believe this news isn't getting more play on this site. With iLife '08, I finally decided to go iPhoto all the way, and let it organize my photos, etc.
I am pretty happy with this solution I suppose, but I know that others on this site would be much happier with Picasa on the Mac.
Refuse to use Picasa because they refuse to release Mac version for so long. They should learn their lesson.
I've never used Picasa, so I am curious, what is the advantage of it compared to iPhoto? (BTW, I use iPhoto's feature of not copying the originals to its library, so I use my own folder based hierarchy.)
Picasa excels at finding and organizing an existing folder of photos. (In my opinion).
Picasa non-destructively edits photos, meaning that it only keeps the original photo on your drive, and all edits are saved in a separate tiny file.
Yes, let's teach a lesson to those people who develop software and give it away for free! Let's not use it. That'll teach them to develop things for OS X faster.