Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I would think OLED screens would be perfect for cars, and at the prices they're charging for these things it doesn't see unreasonable either.

One of the main things I hate about in-car screens is how bright they are at night. With OLED being able to light up only the pixels being used, having a proper night mode would be awesome if 95% of the pixels are off.

Yet as far as I know, no car and no aftermarket headunit come with an OLED screen.

OLED can get burn-in and a car stereo generally sits on the same screen the entire time you're driving. Some elements like the album art may change, but the general controls are always there and would likely burn in with time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tinmania and RevTEG
Auto radios still have cd/dvd players so old people like me can watch movies in the car while the kids are at practice (redbox). You mean you don’t revert back to your 50 capacity cd case just once in a while when you need to hear a classic and your data is at 90%? Am I the only one with limited data and the free version of Spotify?

Limited data? Is that still is an issue? Even my 8 and 2 year old kids have unlimited data on “their” old hand me down iPads. Way cheaper than having to add data all the time and perfect for long road trips.
 
Cool deal but wireless CarPlay is a huge battery drain. You nearly need to plugin your phone to keep up. A wireless charger will allow you to see just a small loss after a drive to work but still won't prevent drain.

Pioneer is known for dropping support and not updating after a short period of time. They stopped issuing firmware updates for the AppRadio 3 just 4 months after release. All future updates to iOS were a crapshoot.
Holy heck, I'm going to second that. I bought a $900 AVIC unit a while ago and it was terrible. It quickly became apparent that we were being leveraged as beta testers for something down the road. But they stopped supporting it far too soon.

I'm hesitant to buy another high-end Pioneer unit any time soon. Their lower-end, lesser-featured stuff is great, though!
 
As I said, Qi will not charge the phone as fast as wireless CarPlay will drain it. And plugging a phone in to a cable takes nearly as much effort as setting it out on a Qi charger, the difference is minimal.

Until they can lower the power consumption of wireless CarPlay, it's not a great option for most. Sorry, but I want to not have to remove my phone from my pocket when I get in the car but also get where I'm going without draining my battery.
I didn’t know this, thanks! My father in law just got a Kenwood Head unit with Apple CarPlay and was debating going wireless. I told him that wireless means more battery, but I didn’t know wireless charging couldn’t keep up.
 
What is this Cd slot you speak of? I revert back to my 128gb usb stick loaded with a bunch of movies plugged into the second usb cord of the back of my pioneer avic-8200 which is ran into my glove box for easy access.
What’s a USB stick? I revert to telling stories in my head and reading MacRumors...
 



The $300 price difference between the two receivers largely relates to the type of touchscreen used. Capacitive touchscreens--think of an iPhone--rely on the electrical charge of a finger, and are generally considered to be better than resistive touchscreens, which rely on the physical pressure of a finger or stylus.

Article Link: Pioneer Releases Wireless CarPlay Systems

1199-699=$500 difference.

Math is hard.
 
Limited data? Is that still is an issue? Even my 8 and 2 year old kids have unlimited data on “their” old hand me down iPads. Way cheaper than having to add data all the time and perfect for long road trips.
I’m still on a 30GB family plan. We barely hit 15 total so no use for unlimited for us. If I switch to unlimited, I also lose my discount. So between my discount and the extra cost of unlimited, my bill will be about $50 more. Not worth it in my opinion.
 
I’m still on a 30GB family plan. We barely hit 15 total so no use for unlimited for us. If I switch to unlimited, I also lose my discount. So between my discount and the extra cost of unlimited, my bill will be about $50 more. Not worth it in my opinion.

I understand. I still get my discount after adding the two additional unlimited iPads. We travel so much that I got tired of having to think about data. The wife and I have ben on unlimited since iPhone 1. I didn't want to even think about it.
 
It's actually a $500 difference: $1199 - $699 = $500. That is a HUGE difference.

It's really disingenuous to charge an extra $500 just so your customers don't have to use a crappy display technology from 12 years ago. You can buy an entire 2018 iPad for less than the upcharge for a capacitive display. And no doubt said displays are probably some really awful 640x480 or 720x480 resolution. They don't even mention the display resolution so I imagine the worst, otherwise they would list it, and in the past displays on these receivers have been pretty awful.
I agree. Capacitive touch should be the norm, unless I am missing some attraction to resistive touch screens in automobiles (other than wearing gloves, but even then there are plenty nowadays that are compatible with capacitive touch). I know I disliked the resistive touch in my 2014 Ford Explorer (pre sync 3) but by the 2016 model year it was updated with Sync 3, and capacitive touch. I think most cars nowadays have capacitive touch displays (both mine and my wife's do).

Granted, Pioneer's target market for these radios is presumably not for new cars. With an older vehicle, going from no touch screen at all to even resistive touch is still a big upgrade. Kind of like going from a Sharp Wizard to a Palm Pilot. :)



Mike
 
  • Like
Reactions: macduke
I've wanted carplay for a long time but at the same time .. I hate apple maps, siri is awful and at that point I just feel like there isn't much use to it. If they were to open it up and allow GOOD apps in place that would be a game changer.

Exactly. No Waze? No GMaps? No care.
 
Cool deal but wireless CarPlay is a huge battery drain. You nearly need to plugin your phone to keep up. A wireless charger will allow you to see just a small loss after a drive to work but still won't prevent drain.
Agree about the battery drain. Heck, even when plugged in, and using Carplay for music and navigating, I might be lucky to charge the phone at all.

I still would like having wireless Carplay though. Unless I am on a longish drive I don't usually plug my iPhone in--often it doesn't leave my pocket. I use my iPhone via Siri eyes free to add reminders and whatnot. But I'd rather full-blown Carplay, since it can show notifications and other features. Not important enough to plug my phone in every time I drive, but if it could be done wirelessly I'd like it. I could still can plug in for longer drives, to avoid battery drain.




Mike
 
I understand the appeal of a capacitive touchscreen, but there is a glare issue. One of the Pioneer head units I have is impossible to see when the sun is coming into the car from certain angles.

Many resistive touchscreens have a matted screen that doesn't reflect like the capacitive ones.
In addition, some of us live somewhere it is cold in the winter and we drive with our gloves on. Resistive touchscreens are good to have.
 



Pioneer has joined Alpine as the second electronics maker to release wireless CarPlay systems for aftermarket installation.

4400-nex.jpg

AVH-W4400NEX

Introduced at CES 2018 in January, product listings have since confirmed that Pioneer's latest AVH-W4400NEX and AVIC-W8400NEX receivers are capable of not only wired and wireless Android Auto, but also wired and wireless CarPlay, enabling drivers to connect an iPhone to either receiver via Bluetooth and Wi-Fi.

Receivers with wired implementations require connecting an iPhone with a Lightning to USB cable to access CarPlay functionality.

The lower-end AVH-W4400NEX features a double-DIN design with a seven-inch resistive touchscreen. The receiver has a suggested price of $699.99 in the United States through resellers such as Crutchfield and Sound of Tri-State. It's also available for C$899.99 in Canada via Best Buy's online store.

The higher-end AVH-W8400NEX features a double-DIN design with a seven-inch capacitive touchscreen. The receiver has a suggested price of $1,199.99 in the United States through resellers such as Crutchfield and Sound of Tri-State. It's also available for C$1,399.99 in Canada via Best Buy's online store.

8400-nex.jpg

AVH-W8400NEX

The $300 price difference between the two receivers largely relates to the type of touchscreen used. Capacitive touchscreens--think of an iPhone--rely on the electrical charge of a finger, and are generally considered to be better than resistive touchscreens, which rely on the physical pressure of a finger or stylus.

Both receivers feature CD/DVD drives, AM/FM, HD Radio, SiriusXM compatibility, two rear USB-A ports, SD card readers, and hands-free phone calls and music playback via Bluetooth in standard AppRadio Mode.

Alpine released the first aftermarket wireless CarPlay system in June 2017. Its iLX-107 receiver features a seven-inch capacitive touchscreen and is available for a suggested price of $900 in the United States. Wireless CarPlay is also available in select new vehicles from BMW, and Mercedes-Benz starting soon.

Pioneer has also released some wireless CarPlay receivers in Europe, according to the blog CarPlay Life. Thanks to MacRumors reader Dean Cobb.

Article Link: Pioneer Releases Wireless CarPlay Systems
I have 2016 Honda CR-V and installed a Kenwood DMX7704S media center. I used apple CarPlay and it is a great system. Only drawback is when I want to watch a video from my phone, it won’t show on the head unit. The newer Kenwood have the wireless capabilities for Apple CarPlay and it will play YouTube and you can use the Waze app as substitute for the Apple map. By the way, my head unit doesn’t have a dvd or gps on it. I watch movies using 1TB of hard drive with tons of movies. Only gripe is, it doesn’t show the list of all the movies on the screen. You can play it one at a time. Hope you guys have an idea on where the technology is coming for people that have knowledge of electronics. Ciao
 
I didn’t know this, thanks! My father in law just got a Kenwood Head unit with Apple CarPlay and was debating going wireless. I told him that wireless means more battery, but I didn’t know wireless charging couldn’t keep up.

Had it in my old BMW. It was nice not having to plugin each time but it drained things fast.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mr. Heckles
I don't regret going with the Sony XAV-AX100. I got it for $323 installed including tax. It is resistive but I don't really notice it. Works great.
 
OLED can get burn-in and a car stereo generally sits on the same screen the entire time you're driving. Some elements like the album art may change, but the general controls are always there and would likely burn in with time.

There are ways to minimize burn-in - such as pixel shifting. Also, in theory, the daytime display would be the approximate inverse of the nighttime display. To the extent the amount of driving done during the day is approximately the same as done at night, it should also mitigate the effect.
 
They want to route their phone through their car and use it as the hub for all data connections and streaming. I think even $599 is kinda overpriced for something that is basically just a big display for your phone but I get it, you guys suck and want to milk people who have older cars. OK. But you don't have to be a jerk and ship a product in 2018 that uses a resistive display. That's just customer hostile.

I installed (with velcro) an ipad mini 1st gen over the radio of my 2001 ford explorer and connected it via mp3 to cassette adapter, Looks and sounds great and i saved a lot of dough
 
One thing I like about the two new models is that there are physical buttons. There has been a trend of the aftermarket head units losing physical buttons and knobs for an on-screen buttons.

Still needs a knob, IMO - my Pioneer has buttons like this and you have to take your eyes off the road to adjust the volume - can’t “feel” for it like you could with a knob. Any my old car doesn’t have steering wheel controls.
 
I installed (with velcro) an ipad mini 1st gen over the radio of my 2001 ford explorer and connected it via mp3 to cassette adapter, Looks and sounds great and i saved a lot of dough
I had a similar experience.


A few years ago on my MR2, the USB stopped working on my head unit, and I was looking into using an iPad as a head unit. The mini fit almost perfectly over top the double-din cutout in the dash trim, and decided to just do the custom work to make it fit.

I purchased an iPad Mini 2, looked into what some other people have done in their cars and before I did the first cut, CarPlay was announced, so I decided to just wait and see what CarPlay was like.

Now, years later, I have been mostly disappointed with CarPlay, it is too limited and buggy. I think I might go ahead with my idea of using an iPad Mini as a head unit.


But you don't have to be a jerk and ship a product in 2018 that uses a resistive display. That's just customer hostile.
As some people pointed out already, there are benefits to having a resistive touchscreen. I think my next head unit will be a resistive one.
 
Still needs a knob, IMO - my Pioneer has buttons like this and you have to take your eyes off the road to adjust the volume - can’t “feel” for it like you could with a knob. Any my old car doesn’t have steering wheel controls.
My JVC doesn’t have any knobs at all. The volume is part of the touch screen and I have no problem adjusting the volume without taking my eyes off he road. It’s not like the volume moves or in the middle, it’s on the left side and no issues. My radio even came with a remote. I don’t use it that often at all, but another option.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.