Please help me decide, MBA i7 vs. i5

jeme

macrumors 6502
Original poster
Jun 12, 2009
250
35
I am having trouble finding a comparison of the two in regards to heat and battery life in the new MBA. I will be doing your standard browsing, some email and simple word and excel and some very minor photo editing.

Thoughts? Thanks in advance for the help.
 

FusionZero

macrumors newbie
Jul 7, 2011
15
0
If that's all you're doing you really don't need the extra processor. If you did more heavy video editing/photo editing on a consistent basis you would probably be better served.

But if you're doing standard use (which from your list you are) you're probably better served with the i5. You may end up seeing better battery life out of it, too.
 

KPOM

macrumors G5
Oct 23, 2010
14,552
3,103
For the kind of usage you describe, the Core i5 would be more than adequate and should serve you well for a long time. It will also get better battery life. Remember, we were all doing those same tasks you describe on Pentiums or PowerPCs a few years ago. Sure, software has gotten more complicated to take advantage of that processing power, but the Sandy Bridge is a brand new design (sort of like what the Core 2 Duo was in 2007), and should be "current" for the next few years. Ivy Bridge is only a minor update (sort of like the early Core 2 Duo vs the later models).
 

trondah

macrumors 6502
Dec 1, 2008
344
0
I'll do a lot more than that and settled on the i5. According to the Geekbench score you could compare it to a C2D 3.2 GHz in terms of raw power. Combined with an SSD and Lion it should be blazing fast for your purposes.
 

drewyboy

macrumors 65816
Jan 27, 2005
1,351
1,417
I'm still having a difficult time figuring out why ppl would go for the i7. I'm not trying to tell anyone how to spend their money, but for .1GHz more and 1MB cache extra. I only honestly see the cache doing something, because thinking about it, 4 virtual core, each 1MB rather than .75MB. 33% increase of cache per core. I know it's not how it technically works, but it helps separate things to look at it like that.
 

Scottsdale

macrumors 601
Sep 19, 2008
4,416
167
U.S.A.
I'm still having a difficult time figuring out why ppl would go for the i7. I'm not trying to tell anyone how to spend their money, but for .1GHz more and 1MB cache extra. I only honestly see the cache doing something, because thinking about it, 4 virtual core, each 1MB rather than .75MB. 33% increase of cache per core. I know it's not how it technically works, but it helps separate things to look at it like that.
Agreed.
 

MRU

Suspended
Aug 23, 2005
25,318
8,813
Other
I'm still having a difficult time figuring out why ppl would go for the i7. I'm not trying to tell anyone how to spend their money, but for .1GHz more and 1MB cache extra. I only honestly see the cache doing something, because thinking about it, 4 virtual core, each 1MB rather than .75MB. 33% increase of cache per core. I know it's not how it technically works, but it helps separate things to look at it like that.
On the 11" it's not .1 ghz more. When turbo boost is enabled (when you are actually using the processor) there is a 600mhz difference (2.3 v 2.9) alongside the extra 1mb cache - means if you are doing more than light work on the machine the extra boost will certainly be felt.
 

SaintsMac

macrumors 6502a
Jun 13, 2009
593
179
Michigan
On the 11" it's not .1 ghz more. When turbo boost is enabled (when you are actually using the processor) there is a 600mhz difference (2.3 v 2.9) alongside the extra 1mb cache - means if you are doing more than light work on the machine the extra boost will certainly be felt.
I like your explanation!
 

Kingcodez

macrumors 6502
May 13, 2009
300
0
China
On the 11" it's not .1 ghz more. When turbo boost is enabled (when you are actually using the processor) there is a 600mhz difference (2.3 v 2.9) alongside the extra 1mb cache - means if you are doing more than light work on the machine the extra boost will certainly be felt.
You sold me on it.
 

Oppressed

macrumors 65816
Aug 15, 2010
1,265
10
On the 11" it's not .1 ghz more. When turbo boost is enabled (when you are actually using the processor) there is a 600mhz difference (2.3 v 2.9) alongside the extra 1mb cache - means if you are doing more than light work on the machine the extra boost will certainly be felt.
Don't forget the ability to fry an egg on the keyboard as well.
 

Apple Expert

macrumors 65816
Jan 31, 2010
1,337
0
Take it from me. I own both. Mine is the i7 and hers is the i5. Do I see a difference in speed? HECK NO! I've yet to do heavy work on the i7. But the iTunes, web, mail and photo edits I've done so far - I've yet to see a difference in speed. Maybe if I did some heavy 3D work or games I might get a benefit. But for daily task I just mentioned, no difference at all!
 

MBABuyer

macrumors regular
May 4, 2011
153
0
VA
Just to let everyone know.

Regardless of specs (I am sure the i5 is great)....the i7 is great also, don't be worried about fans or heat....it isn't an issue at all with mine. The fans come on occasionally for HD videos, but turn off once the video stops playing.

Enjoy it!
 

greenmountain

macrumors newbie
Jul 7, 2010
29
0
Can anyone address the second half of the OP's question: battery life? How much mobility time is one likely to give up by upgrading to the i7, esp on the 11in?

Thanks in advance.
 

Similar threads

  • styates
11
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • Christopher Azzara
1
Replies
1
Views
482
  • CPablo
3
Replies
3
Views
666
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.