Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
So you are saying that you don't care or can work around other companies doing shady stuff.

And what's fishy about selling data? I mean, it's not like I'm not aware that they're doing things like this. And it wasn't that long ago that Apple was scanning your photos and videos in Icloud for child pornography content but when it's Apple it's ok and everyone quickly forgets, just imagine if Facebook did it..
 
Dunno, whats fishy about a removable "fixed" power cable on a monitor that one can easily avoid that can be fixed/replaced easily in the rare event that you break it?

So you call going to a Apple store or a 3rd party autorized shop just to get a new power cord "easy" ?? We must not live in the same world buddy
 
So you call going to a Apple store or a 3rd party autorized shop just to get a new power cord "easy" ??

So you break your power cords often enough for that to be an actual concern?

Different worlds indeed.

To summarise:
If the power cord had been really fixed to the display it would have been a real bad move by Apple.

Since it isn't but just a non standard plug it is only a minor annoyance.
 
  • Like
Reactions: haruhiko
The cable is the same length as my iPhone cable. This genuinely would not fit in any desk setup I have had, and I would have otherwise considered the display.

It's absolutely pathetic that people are making apologetics for this move. The iMac's magnetic power cable, with expansion capability, would have been perfect here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Eradusea
So you break your power cords often enough for that to be an actual concern?

Different worlds indeed.

To summarise:
If the power cord had been really fixed to the display it would have been a real bad move by Apple.

Since it isn't but just a non standard plug it is only a minor annoyance.

Wow, amazing. It's because of people like you that Apple keeps doing things that go against the consumer, and how is it a small inconvenience not to be able to change the plug? Especially since the cable is only 2 meter long
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: ScholarsInk
The power cable was attached to the Studio Display in the box.

I am not going to attempt any further in removing the power cable, because it seems pretty firm.

Can anyone verify if the power cable can be removed?

Otherwise, this is going to make cleaning my desk very difficult for me, since my cable management has all the cables tied together and routed underneath my desk. There is barely any wiggle room to move the display while the cable is attached to the display.
Based on "Linus Tech Tips" video, the power cord IS removable but it is not an easy unplug like most cords. Based on that and on Apple's statements that it is not removable, it seem like it is not intended to be removed under normal use but it can be replaced if the cable is damaged.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: haruhiko and Zensō
I prefer this over the iMac’s separate power brick to be honest.
I disagree, because the length on the iMac is longer. Thankfully the Studio Display cable length is 2 meters and is enough to route it under my desk. I was worried it wouldn't.

Apple went out of their way to make this power cable fixed to the display with the spring latches, when they had other devices with detachable cables, especially with the magnetic power cable on the iMac or MagSafe.

It feels pretty anti-consumer.
 
I might have to change how my setup works, because cleaning my entire desk is impossible if I can't just unplug the power cable from the display.

I would have to remove the cables mounted and tied underneath my desk, move my desk to access those panels and a cabinet, then move my side cabinet to disconnect the power cable and Thunderbolt cable.

All of this, while having my two meter cables flail everywhere, whereas I would just move the display without anything dangling that's two meters long.

If I just shift the display to each side to clean, I will just be smearing dust and dirt on the footpads.

Why would you do this Apple
 
  • Like
Reactions: ScholarsInk
so stupid the cable isn't removable even with a semi-strong magnet if spacing was an issue. its not about routinely damaging a cable, but **** happens and if a simply cable gets damaged NOW you have to take your entire display into Apple...that is dumb. It is reminiscent of their prior displays that had the built in stuff (acrylic studio display and the cinema displays).
 
  • Like
Reactions: ScholarsInk
I might have to change how my setup works, because cleaning my entire desk is impossible if I can't just unplug the power cable from the display.

I would have to remove the cables mounted and tied underneath my desk, move my desk to access those panels and a cabinet, then move my side cabinet to disconnect the power cable and Thunderbolt cable.

All of this, while having my two meter cables flail everywhere, whereas I would just move the display without anything dangling that's two meters long.

If I just shift the display to each side to clean, I will just be smearing dust and dirt on the footpads.

Why would you do this Apple

Apple displays already killed a lot of my interest once they switched over to the far inferior 16:9 ratio. With this one, there seems to be little to recommend it.

Samsung is now producing OLED monitor panels with 1000 nit brightness. The first monitor to be released with it is a 32" Dell/Alienware at $1300, but I imagine it's just a matter of weeks before someone releases a monitor with that panel that has a plainer body.
 
  • Like
Reactions: haruhiko
Apple displays already killed a lot of my interest once they switched over to the far inferior 16:9 ratio. With this one, there seems to be little to recommend it.

Samsung is now producing OLED monitor panels with 1000 nit brightness. The first monitor to be released with it is a 32" Dell/Alienware at $1300, but I imagine it's just a matter of weeks before someone releases a monitor with that panel that has a plainer body.
Isn’t that QD-OLED panel only 1440p? I’m sure that eventually they’ll do better but it isn’t really suitable as a computer display with that low resolution.
 
Isn’t that QD-OLED panel only 1440p? I’m sure that eventually they’ll do better but it isn’t really suitable as a computer display with that low resolution.

I mean I don't think 1440p (2560 x 1440) is that low a resolution, but it's not. It's 3440 x 1440. Doesn't really work for me because I want a 16:10 display, but I hate that Apple (even though it's keeping the faith in the mobile space by having MacBooks remain 16:10) has gone all in on 16:9 in all desktop settings.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tagbert
The iMac's magnetic power cable, with expansion capability, would have been perfect here.
so stupid the cable isn't removable even with a semi-strong magnet if spacing was an issue.
Magnets and AC do not mix. You create inductance, shortens the life of power supply components, and in extreme case becomes point of ignition.
iMac has external power supply, its DC on that side.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BellSystem
Magnets and AC do not mix. You create inductance, shortens the life of power supply components, and in extreme case becomes point of ignition.
iMac has external power supply, its DC on that side.
They just seem to want to find a reason to be mad at the display so they can say Apple is stealing their freedom. Nobody seemed to care when the Cinema Displays had a non-removal ADC/DVI & Power cable for years. There is only so much room to play with. It would have looked like crap if it had the bulge on the back like the iMac. I also don’t need another power block on the floor either. I’m happy with Apple’s choice. It’s amazing that everyone around here gets mad at a design decision that isn’t even new for Apple. Why does everyone just want to be mad about it? We’re finally after years of the dark ages of Apple starting to come out of it.
 
They just seem to want to find a reason to be mad at the display so they can say Apple is stealing their freedom. Nobody seemed to care when the Cinema Displays had a non-removal ADC/DVI & Power cable for years. There is only so much room to play with. It would have looked like crap if it had the bulge on the back like the iMac. I also don’t need another power block on the floor either. I’m happy with Apple’s choice. It’s amazing that everyone around here gets mad at a design decision that isn’t even new for Apple. Why does everyone just want to be mad about it? We’re finally after years of the dark ages of Apple starting to come out of it.
I would take external supply any day, as long as mains side was removable. That way I can make my own mains cables to the exact length. I see people rolling up AC lines in their cable management. But that creates an inductance coil, EMF and RFI.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ScholarsInk
Grass is always greener on the other side, or maybe in this case: hope you find the detachable cable that you lost.

Not care much if it is detachable or not, as long as it works. Don't move around my monitors that much or very often. so not a problem. I don’t have to search for the attached cables that much….
 
They just seem to want to find a reason to be mad at the display so they can say Apple is stealing their freedom. Nobody seemed to care when the Cinema Displays had a non-removal ADC/DVI & Power cable for years. There is only so much room to play with. It would have looked like crap if it had the bulge on the back like the iMac. I also don’t need another power block on the floor either. I’m happy with Apple’s choice. It’s amazing that everyone around here gets mad at a design decision that isn’t even new for Apple. Why does everyone just want to be mad about it? We’re finally after years of the dark ages of Apple starting to come out of it.
Because the wire could get frayed, dirty, or another reason that would warrant a cable replacement. Which would require you to take the entire display to an Apple Store, for something so simple as a cable swap.

The power supply is inside the display. I’m pretty sure the old iMac had the same flush insert like the Studio Display, except it was removable.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ScholarsInk
The power supply is inside the display. I’m pretty sure the old iMac had the same flush insert like the Studio Display, except it was removable.
The Studio Display power cord is removable, though. Unless you have a different definition for removable than what I'm thinking?
 
The Studio Display power cord is removable, though. Unless you have a different definition for removable than what I'm thinking?

I think they are hoping for "user removable" which it seems according to Apple it is not. I personally would not try unplugging it until it was out of warranty and I really needed to. Apple does not want you to remove it for a reason. I would trust the judgement of the people that built the thing over an adventurous forum user. Seems silly to risk damage if you can go to an Apple Store (I know that is not always an option for people). It is still a step up from the Thunderbolt Display which as I recall was hardwired in.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tagbert
I think they are hoping for "user removable" which it seems according to Apple it is not. I personally would not try unplugging it until it was out of warranty and I really needed to. Apple does not want you to remove it for a reason. I would trust the judgement of the people that built the thing over an adventurous forum user. Seems silly to risk damage if you can go to an Apple Store (I know that is not always an option for people). It is still a step up from the Thunderbolt Display which as I recall was hardwired in.
That's probably the case here. To me the distinction is, as you said, that the cable is not hardwired in. If I faced a situation where I would need to have the cable removed I'd contact Apple and politely ask if replacing just the cable was an option, because I know it can be removed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tagbert
They just seem to want to find a reason to be mad at the display so they can say Apple is stealing their freedom. Nobody seemed to care when the Cinema Displays had a non-removal ADC/DVI & Power cable for years. There is only so much room to play with. It would have looked like crap if it had the bulge on the back like the iMac. I also don’t need another power block on the floor either. I’m happy with Apple’s choice. It’s amazing that everyone around here gets mad at a design decision that isn’t even new for Apple. Why does everyone just want to be mad about it? We’re finally after years of the dark ages of Apple starting to come out of it.

I take it you consider the butterfly keyboard and 12" MacBook to be the pinnacles of engineering.
 
I take it you consider the butterfly keyboard and 12" MacBook to be the pinnacles of engineering.
I’ve have a Gold MacBook with those since 2017. I have not had one problem and thought they worked well. I don’t know what everyone else does to their keyboards, but from my perspective there was nothing wrong with that keyboard. The shallow travel was also nice on fingers. I prefer it over the current crap keyboards on the MacBook Pros.
 
Because the wire could get frayed, dirty, or another reason that would warrant a cable replacement. Which would require you to take the entire display to an Apple Store, for something so simple as a cable swap.

The power supply is inside the display. I’m pretty sure the old iMac had the same flush insert like the Studio Display, except it was removable.
I have never in all my years had to replace a power cable from normal ware and tare. I still have one from my Mac SE and it outlasted it. Unless you treat it like crap, that cable will outlast the display. You can’t replace the cables on a Cinema Display so again this is nothing new and just the latest thing for people to be upset about.

The old iMac is thicker and the newer ones are not flat on the back. Why do you think Apple did this to screw you? It takes much more work for them to design and produce this than just slapping on a standard connector. They are not going to spend money on r&d just to force you to bring the display to the store that just makes more work for them.

I agree it’s a PITA….but realistically the amount of people that need to replace this over it’s life time is less than 1% I imagine.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.