Sidebar Sidebar
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

POLL: 13" MBP - 2.26 v 2.53 - which are you?

If you have a new 13" MBP, which model did you go for?

  • 2.26GHz

    Votes: 85 67.5%

  • 2.53GHz

    Votes: 41 32.5%
  • Total voters
    126
S

stevearm

macrumors 6502a
Original poster
Nov 15, 2007
992
91
I'm going to be getting a 13" MBP in the coming weeks, and am a bit torn over which model to get. So I thought I'd put a poll up as I'm curious what the majority of people went for.

Those who've tried both, is there a noticeable difference?
 
for me, the price does not justify the difference in processor performance (about 10%)

i decided to pay for the 2.26 and buy extra ram and a SSD by myself
 
The biggest difference is the price. You pay a premium for that extra 10% of CPU clock speed... which doesn't even come close to adding another 10% of performance to your running app.

The 2.26 13" mbp plus the student discount plus the free iPod Touch is a steal of a deal.
 
Voted 2.26GHz.

Spend the difference on a decent Intel SSD and you'll be noticing a whole world of difference. :)
 
I'd love a SSD hard disk but I'd rather not open my laptop up and mess around with it. And the Apple SSD's are way too expensive.

Thing is, it's not exactly a huge leap in terms of cost, £110. What would the extra 10% of CPU speed actually do? Opening applications quicker? That sort of thing?
 
stevearm said:
Thing is, it's not exactly a huge leap in terms of cost, £110. What would the extra 10% of CPU speed actually do? Opening applications quicker? That sort of thing?
Click to expand...

It could, in the best case, speed some encoding you do from 30 seconds to 27.

For opening apps quicker or having a more "snappy feel", the 10% extra CPU buys you nothing. Installing more RAM or an SSD can make a huge improvement.

SSDs are a bit expensive now but will become cheaper soon. Opening your laptop and installing RAM and SSD is actually quite easy. If you don't want to do it yourself, buy the RAM/SSD at an Apple shop and let them do it for you.

Edit:
I'm not sure, but wouldn't the faster CPU run hotter? Drain the battery faster?
 
I went for the 2.53GHz.

In Canada, it was like $300 more. It would cost me $70 CAD for the RAM, $56 for the HDD, and then I was basically paying only $180 more for a third of 1GHz increase. Seemed worthwhile to me.

You can always upgrade the RAM, HDD, etc. down the line, but the processor you're stuck with. Might as well go big in the beginning.

Plus, I could have gone with an Intel SSD or something from the price savings, but with the max being 160GB for a lot of money, I'll hold out for the 300GB coming in Q1 2010 likely for the same price or cheaper. That way when it comes out I won't be punching myself for spending half a thousand dollars for an SSD made obsolete four months from purchase.

SSDs aren't quite worth it yet, IMO.

Above all, though, before this 13" MBP I had 2.4GHz MacBook Unibody (solely upgrade from 2.0->2.4 for the backlit keyboard) and I couldn't see myself downgrading.
 
I sprung for the 2.26GHz 'cause, as others have said, the extra 270MHz will go by pretty much unnoticed by most users, myself included.

I've just spent the money saved on an Up-to-Date Snow Leopard disk, 4GB RAM from Crucial and I'll probably be getting a 320GB HDD from Amazon in the next couple of weeks.

In my opinion, the 2.53GHz is actually a bad purchase when you consider the upgrades you can acquire from third parties for the price difference.
 
The 2.26 and with the money saved I bought myself an Intel X-25M SSD. That'll be waaaaay more noticeable than a tiny 260Mhz increase on the CPU.
 
Doju said:
I went for the 2.53GHz.

In Canada, it was like $300 more. It would cost me $70 CAD for the RAM, $56 for the HDD, and then I was basically paying only $180 more for a third of 1GHz increase. Seemed worthwhile to me.

You can always upgrade the RAM, HDD, etc. down the line, but the processor you're stuck with. Might as well go big in the beginning.

Plus, I could have gone with an Intel SSD or something from the price savings, but with the max being 160GB for a lot of money, I'll hold out for the 300GB coming in Q1 2010 likely for the same price or cheaper. That way when it comes out I won't be punching myself for spending half a thousand dollars for an SSD made obsolete four months from purchase.

SSDs aren't quite worth it yet, IMO.

Above all, though, before this 13" MBP I had 2.4GHz MacBook Unibody (solely upgrade from 2.0->2.4 for the backlit keyboard) and I couldn't see myself downgrading.
Click to expand...

X2.
 
But out of curiosity, what would the extra MHz actually do? I'm not hugely computer literate...

RAM is for for example, opening 20 documents in photoshop at the same time and not having it lag.

HD/SSD is for accessing files

CPU does what exactly, just perform calculations quicker, meaning the whole maching will run faster?
 
stevearm said:
But out of curiosity, what would the extra MHz actually do? I'm not hugely computer literate...

RAM is for for example, opening 20 documents in photoshop at the same time and not having it lag.

HD/SSD is for accessing files

CPU does what exactly, just perform calculations quicker, meaning the whole maching will run faster?
Click to expand...

SSD will give you the most improvements in app opening speeds.
 
stevearm said:
But out of curiosity, what would the extra MHz actually do? I'm not hugely computer literate...

RAM is for for example, opening 20 documents in photoshop at the same time and not having it lag.

HD/SSD is for accessing files

CPU does what exactly, just perform calculations quicker, meaning the whole maching will run faster?
Click to expand...

In theory.

You only use 10-40% of your processor 80% of the time. So for regular tasks you'll see very little if any difference. Large intensive tasks such as CS rendering or HandBraking you'll see the ≤10% processor speed increase.
 
NC MacGuy said:
In theory.

You only use 10-40% of your processor 80% of the time. So for regular tasks you'll see very little if any difference. Large intensive tasks such as CS rendering or HandBraking you'll see the ≤10% processor speed increase.
Click to expand...

:)What he says ^^ :D.
 
It is widely published that the real world benefit of a processor with only ~.3 ghz difference is a waste of money. You're better suited investing in a faster HDD or an SSD at this point. I would not waste my money on a 2.53 MBP. I'm thinking of selling my Air for a MBP, with that it'll have the SSD and it will be the "low end" model. Even with an 8-core MP I can tell you that rarely do I use more than 40% of the processing power on that these days.
 
The difference after tax (for me) was ~$375

4GB of RAM after tax and shipping (on sale) is about $80

A 500GB HD is about $90-$100

Send the rest on AppleCare
 
you're definitely right

I totally forgot about AppleCare !!

for those who don't want SSD, having a bigger HD + extra RAM and AppleCare represents the premium between 2.26 and 2.53
 
I got the 2.53. I needed to get straight working into photoshop and soon to be Final Cut so i thought i should just go with whats stocked in with 4GB and the bigger hard drive. I don't plan on getting an SSD until there a lot cheaper at 256GB or whatever. I'll probably buy an SSD when the next OS launches, or in 2 years, whichever comes first.
 
I was basically paying only $180 more for a third of 1GHz increase. Seemed worthwhile to me.
Click to expand...

$180 for .27GHz is the biggest waste of money I've ever heard.

The fact that the P8400 and the P8700 both retails in the public marketplace for the same price of $225 shows that the P8700 is used by Apple as a marketing ploy.

Add to the fact that 3rd party RAM/HD is almost always faster and you have a bad deal.

You are essentially giving Apple at least $200 in gross profit (on top of the profit of the 2.26) if you go with the 2.53.
 
idk about you guys but i'm the 2.0.

just kidding.

who wouldn't get the 2.53. the small difference in processing power can and WILL have a huge increase on your day to day computing.
 
michael.lauden said:
idk about you guys but i'm the 2.0.

just kidding.

who wouldn't get the 2.53. the small difference in processing power can and WILL have a huge increase on your day to day computing.
Click to expand...

Huge? How so?

I don't mind the 2.53 crowd, they're paying extra $ to keep the 2.26 prices down ;) If we only had one SKU, it'd probably be $200 more to get a MBP13.
 
Who wouldn't? Those who understand there more to adding additional ram and a faster HDD than there is to that minor speed bump.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.
Top Bottom
Back