A little poll to see how the MacRumors community feels about USB-C vs Lightning ports on iPhones. Thought this was timely, given that the first iPhone modified with a USB-C port just sold on eBay for $86K
Most people aren’t educated enough about the plusses and minuses of USB-C vs Lightning on an iPhone to make an informed decision. Yeah - everyone has an opinion but that doesn’t mean they really understand to nuances of what they’re actually voting for.
With that being said - this poll is worthless (sorry)
Care to enlighten us pleebs? I just want to be able to have *one* cord when I travel that works to charge my MBP, iPhone, headphones, etcMost people aren’t educated enough about the plusses and minuses of USB-C vs Lightning on an iPhone to make an informed decision. Yeah - everyone has an opinion but that doesn’t mean they really understand to nuances of what they’re actually voting for.
With that being said - this poll is worthless (sorry)
I think he's one of the people he's talking about.Maybe you’d do the community a favour of laying out these pluses and minuses to help those you’re guessing aren’t educated enough.
What a pain it would be for existing iPhone users! What about offering USB-C as an add on?
By that logic, shouldn't we just have stuck with the 30 pin connector?It's not so much about charging as it is accessories, things that cost money and have Lightning plugs and that you don't want to have to replace, such as headphones, microphones, docks, etc…
The EU mandating standardization of smartphones to utilize USB-C will likely make the iPhone 14 be that.
And data transfer? Now that the iPhone shoots ProRes and you can fill up a 1TB phone in a few hours, they definitely need a higher-speed connector. Lightning is laughably slow.No, it'll just accelerate Apple's goal towards a portless iPhone. Apple would love if instead of buying a simple Lightning cable you now have to buy MagSafe charger.
The current infrastructure is all Lightning. iPhone doesn't take advantage of 100W PD charging or external displays. Stick with Lightning.
And data transfer? Now that the iPhone shoots ProRes and you can fill up a 1TB phone in a few hours, they definitely need a higher-speed connector. Lightning is laughably slow.
Also, the current infrastructure is all lightning is you only use an iPhone. The minute you bring a Mac, an iPad, or any other modern tech into the mix, the iPhone is the outlier. Apple abandoned the connector on their other products because it wasn't good enough, it's time for the iPhone to catch up.
You're probably right, but it still seems so dumb to have multiple connectors across the their product lines when one (that they helped create as a standard and championed) can do the job.In the long term, I think Apple is betting on Wi-Fi 6E for AirDrop and iCloud Photos for those large files. It's a teething problem while we're waiting for it.
Looks like Wi-Fi 6E might top out at about 9.6 Gbps - and that's under optimal conditions. USB-C (USB 3.1) could top out at 10 Gbps, which, in my experience, is more reliable. If Apple chooses Thunderbolt 4, that ups it to 40 Gbps as well.In the long term, I think Apple is betting on Wi-Fi 6E for AirDrop and iCloud Photos for those large files. It's a teething problem while we're waiting for it.
In the long term, I think Apple is betting on Wi-Fi 6E for AirDrop and iCloud Photos for those large files. It's a teething problem while we're waiting for it.