Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
No offence to any one but to me British English is more proper than American English. American English looks "lazy" (example: Jewellery--->Jewelry).

It's not laziness, it's efficiency. The printing industry in the U.S. saved $7.3 billion dollars of ink in the last year alone* by not printing extraneous "u"s in words like color and labor. By advocating inefficient spelling you are advocating total economic collapse, and that is just plain evil. And you don't want to be evil, do you? Well, do you?

--Eric

* This figure was derived by using the tried-and-true "pulled from thin air" method, and therefore may not be entirely accurate.
 
Ok.
Another question, what is the difference between Australian and British English then? They "look" the same to me.

Not sure, since I have no use for either in daily life, I haven't bothered to study the differences.
 
Technically my spellings are right too.
Besides, why should it matter if it is an American site?

Because you come here and tell everyone that they need to change the American English to completely different spellings. That's what makes it matter. You want to arbitrarily change a language, and you haven't provided one good reason to do so.
 
It's not laziness, it's efficiency. The printing industry in the U.S. saved $7.3 billion dollars of ink in the last year alone* by not printing extraneous "u"s in words like color and labor. By advocating inefficient spelling you are advocating total economic collapse, and that is just plain evil. And you don't want to be evil, do you? Well, do you?
Why do you assume that I am evil?
I am not evil but I am still going to use British English spelling online.

Also, are you saying that British English is "inefficient" spelling?

How about this:
Fulfill (American)----> Fulfil (British)
There is one.
 
Because you come here and tell everyone that they need to change the American English to completely different spellings. That's what makes it matter. You want to arbitrarily change a language, and you haven't provided one good reason to do so.

I did not say change, I said consider changing.
Besides, I am not that much into making "new" words now.
 
BTW, this is an American site, so technically all your spellings are wrong.

Besides, why should it matter if it is an American site?

Hang on a minute.

I doubt that arn considers MacRumors an American site, just because he chose an American spelling of the word "Rumours".

I think you would agree that it's home may be there, but it's heart is World-wide.
 
Wow. You just never give up. I thought you agreed with Skunk to stop trying to shove your beloved British English down everyone's throats?

I just like to point out a few things. That is all.
It is not that I am against American English any more.
 
How about this?

You shave your whole body below you neck and Americans shave a few letters here and there from British English.

kthxbai
 
You shave your whole body below you neck and Americans shave a few letters here and there from British English.
Ok, that is fine now.

Let American English and British English go there separate ways.

Both are fine.
I just realised how silly it is to recommend British English to Americans.

I am really sorry guys now.
Please forgiving.

No longer thou shalt hear of what I have to say something negative about American English.
 
Good. I hope you realize that British English is as far from the "original" as U.S. English is.

As far as the "fulfil" thing goes, an "l" is much narrower than a "u" so I'm afraid it doesn't begin to make up for all that wasted ink. Nice try at avoiding evil though.

--Eric
 
It's not laziness, it's efficiency. The printing industry in the U.S. saved $7.3 billion dollars of ink in the last year alone* by not printing extraneous "u"s in words like color and labor. By advocating inefficient spelling you are advocating total economic collapse, and that is just plain evil. And you don't want to be evil, do you? Well, do you?
On the other hand, one of the key bodies in the UK printing industry – British Union of Lithographic Liquid Providers (and Other Official People) – reports that the extra jobs and revenue created by the supply of all that extra ink has contributed the equivalent of $7.4 billion to the British economy over the past twelve months alone.

So, I think you have to concede we're right in this instance – after all, you can't argue with these BULLPOOP figures.
 
So, I think you have to concede we're right in this instance – after all, you can't argue with these BULLPOOP figures.

Damn, you're right! OK, you got me this time, but I'll be back! Just you wait! (I'm impressed by the acronym though!)

Why are you still saying that I am evil?

Are you saying that British English and the British people are evil as well? :rolleyes:

You're not so great at getting tongue-in-cheek humo(u)r, are you?

--Eric
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.