Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
The app is simply impressive. Visualizing the depth map to edit the bokeh, in particular. It does show me where the depth detection has failed in some of the shots, and solved the mystery of why a couple of my portrait mode photos turned out weird. If that depth data could be edited like henrikhelmers wanted, it would be perfect. But in the mean time I could use the app to see what sort of conditions work better in terms of depth detection.
 
  • Like
Reactions: freezelighter
Been using this a while. I love it. I just hope they add the ability to do the different portrait modes.
 
Yes, absolutely.

Focos allows depth capture for portrait shots beyond Apple's 8-foot maximum range. Photos will simply be a non-portrait 2x shot if you try and take pictures like mine below with the stock camera app.

This is the absolute game changer here. This is honestly the best app in years - here's some shots from the past couple months. Without a doubt the biggest step in mobile photography in the last decade.

BhQGdOW.jpg

2wd7eTn.jpg
gd6Nh1v.jpg
MNAZCkw.jpg
6Q2jdy7.jpg
KWctvtm.jpg
G6QAuGN.jpg
8gTEEV6.jpg
IOmyTpk.jpg
lhlgm9D.jpg
v9limqxezk401.jpg

Some nice shots in there but anything with trees just falls apart.
 
  • Like
Reactions: fs454
The app is simply impressive. Visualizing the depth map to edit the bokeh, in particular. It does show me where the depth detection has failed in some of the shots, and solved the mystery of why a couple of my portrait mode photos turned out weird. If that depth data could be edited like henrikhelmers wanted, it would be perfect. But in the mean time I could use the app to see what sort of conditions work better in terms of depth detection.

I do wish someone would make a depthmap editor. Just a way to "push" certain areas toward the background would be nice, at least. There must be something standing in the way of making this happen, but I'm not sure what.
 
Some nice shots in there but anything with trees just falls apart.


It does have a hard time with trees and understandably so - it can only resolve so much fine detail to discern individual branches at 12MP and whatever resolution Apple is currently able to calculate the depthmap at in realtime. However I don't think that affected any of my shots except #5 (the widest shot of the Audi from the back, that super tall tree didn't read right) to a degree that anyone would notice unless we were studying them specifically for portrait mode mishaps. I render out my shots to closely resemble the real lenses that I own, which are a set of vintage 1959 Leica primes, and for most of these they feel close enough that I could mix them up with a bunch of actual shots from my A7s/A7rii and you'd be hard pressed to tell the difference unless you looked at them at 100% crop.

The best thing about the era of Portrait mode and computational photography as a whole is that it gets the ball far enough over the line that most aren't going to be fussed with it, but you've got no photography gear on you besides a tiny slab of glass.
 
  • Like
Reactions: eyeseeyou
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.