Some of mine from today and the other day. I usually get close or around 2MB with my 3G.View attachment 419025View attachment 419026
What black magic is this? Sprint never gets these speeds I thought
Some of mine from today and the other day. I usually get close or around 2MB with my 3G.View attachment 419025View attachment 419026
Isn't it impossible to get these speeds on 3G?
What black magic is this? Sprint never gets these speeds I thought![]()
What black magic is this? Sprint never gets these speeds I thought![]()
So we can all safely assume Verizon 3G is the absolute worst? Lol
I'd say Verizon and Sprint are tied for the worst 3G speeds.
I'd say Verizon and Sprint are tied for the worst 3G speeds.
No way. Sprint is in a whole different class of fail. Why is it that VZW has over 100 million customers (most still with unlimited data), but can provide usable data everywhere, but Sprint can't do the same.
DC-HSPA supports up to 43 Mb/s (theoretically).
My speed's relatively high at the moment because it's the weekend. On a business day I'd get about half of this:
Image
Ill say it before anyone else does. It's looks like your using Sprint. Lol
Hi!
I want to see how the 3G networks around the world performs.
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2013/06/25/galaxy_s4_way_faster_than_iphone_5_which/UK consumer magazine Which? has dropped a benchmark bucket on the iPhone, rating it the slowest of seven smartphones under test.
The magazine ran the Geekbench 2 test on seven phones the iPhone 5, Samsung's Galaxy S4, the HTC One, Sony's Experia Z, Google's Nexus 4, the Samsung Galaxy Note 2, and the BlackBerry Z10.
With a Geekbench 2 score of 3,188, Apple's nemesis, the Galaxy S4, scored 91.6 percent better than the iPhone 5 on the test (scoring a limping 1,664), and 14 percent better than the number-two phone, the HTC One, which managed 2,798 on the test.
The result closely mirrors the same benchmark run in March 2013 by Android Authority, cited by Geekbench developer Primate Labs here. In that test, the S4 hit 3,163 and the iPhone 5 1,596.
It's hardly surprising, of course, that a more expensive device with a 1.9 GHz quad-core processor would outperform the dual-core 1.2 GHz iPhone 5. Which? notes that while getting the fastest on the market also mean forking out the highest price, in the midfield, it's less clear: the Sony Xperia Z was only fractionally ahead of the Google Nexus 4, but the latter is more than ₤200 ($US308, $AU334) more expensive than Sony's offering.
The test results will also be a disappointment for BlackBerry, which has been pinning hopes for a revival on its recently-released Z10, which only managed to score 1,698 on the Geekbench 2 tests.
Apparently, here in the UK, the iphone 5 is the slowest of all the smartphones.
The next iphone has a lot of catching up to do.
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2013/06/25/galaxy_s4_way_faster_than_iphone_5_which/
sprint is just screaming fast here in downtown manhatten.
Wow that's pretty terrible thank god mine are slightly better than that