The same photo of my garden after editing with the Lightroom app
It just uses digital zoom. I don't use it for macro.so what the differences of using it?
The difference between the iPhone 6s and any RX100 model is literally night and day. The M3 in my opinion shoots at a quality matching DSLR/APS-C systems from a couple years ago.Thanks. The iPhone is great for when you don't have any other options, but I think that Sony will still be my main. I tried a DSLR once, too much, too heavy.
View attachment 593577 View attachment 593579 Hi guys,
The same photo of my garden after editing with the Lightroom app
pardon me, are you living in jail?
The difference between the iPhone 6s and any RX100 model is literally night and day. The M3 in my opinion shoots at a quality matching DSLR/APS-C systems from a couple years ago.
^At a pig roast now. The skin tones are perfect.
^I think I'll stick with it for a while, maybe until A7000, and only if it comes with a leaf silent shutter. That was the deal breaker that made me return the A6000 and stick with the RX100M3.
No plans on getting the A7rII. It's overpriced for my vacation needs.
The difference between the iPhone 6s and any RX100 model is literally night and day. The M3 in my opinion shoots at a quality matching DSLR/APS-C systems from a couple years ago.
I agree. I think the same can be said for the Canon G7X. I took some shots to compare my 6S+ to the G7X and the differences were quite significant. I can definitely get DSLR level results with the G7X in many shooting situations. For photos, I think the G7X is more versatile, but the Sony wins for video. It's pretty awesome what these little cameras can do.
the only major significance is a bigger sensor and lens which allow dedicated cameras much better results than what smartpohnes cameras can offer today.
it's not a matter of better or worse. just different equipment unsuited to fit in a smartphone.
so claiming "far better results" is insignificant, it's not the point.
I'm confused by your post. First you say dedicated cameras will offer much better results, and then you say far better results is insignificant and not the point. The results being far better is the point.
A bigger sensor and lens (and I would add higher quality image processing, more megapixels, manual controls, RAW support, etc.) is a major significance, and those differences definitely showed in the comparison shots I took. I'm not saying it's a fair comparison. While both devices are similar in size, the G7X is huge compared to the actual camera components inside a smartphone. Cameras like the G7X or the RX100 are still worth comparing to top of the line smartphones like the 6S, though, because they're all legit mobile camera options in 2015.
i still think there's STILL no point in even comparing smartphone photos to compact camera photos.
maybe in a year or two there will be a breakthrough, but not atm.
Taken after a most agreeable lunch on Saturday in Stratford-Upon-Avon
iPhone 6
View attachment 593743 6s
View attachment 593744