Having been persuaded of the benefits of Macs by a couple of friends who have them, I started reading around to research my potential purchase (C2D MBP) a bit. It all looked great - glowing reviews in the mags, also in the vast majority of the online reviews I found. Then I found MacRumours: initially it was fine, a great source of info on potential changes coming up etc. Then I thought "I'll have a look at the forums to see what users are saying", which is where it started to go horribly wrong....
If you read the "pro" reviews, MBPs are great - superb screens, well-made, suitable for pro use, "A Mac laptop exudes class" as one UK mag said. On the other hand, if you read here it's like they're the buggiest, worst-made thing ever, with grainy screens that can't display millions of colours properly without banding and people needing to go through 3 laptops before they get a working one etc. etc.
Now I know that any product will have a percentage of DOAs, problems etc. and that forums tend to attract people who have complaints rather than those with no problems. It's just that I really can't see how some of these issues like the screens got missed by the pro reviewers if they exist. However, if the machines are as good as the reviews say, why are so many people complaining about build quality, the screens etc.?
Basically I can't reconcile these two opposite points of view and I'm getting put off switching by all the negativity. Maybe I shouldn't have started reading here at all.....
If you read the "pro" reviews, MBPs are great - superb screens, well-made, suitable for pro use, "A Mac laptop exudes class" as one UK mag said. On the other hand, if you read here it's like they're the buggiest, worst-made thing ever, with grainy screens that can't display millions of colours properly without banding and people needing to go through 3 laptops before they get a working one etc. etc.
Now I know that any product will have a percentage of DOAs, problems etc. and that forums tend to attract people who have complaints rather than those with no problems. It's just that I really can't see how some of these issues like the screens got missed by the pro reviewers if they exist. However, if the machines are as good as the reviews say, why are so many people complaining about build quality, the screens etc.?
Basically I can't reconcile these two opposite points of view and I'm getting put off switching by all the negativity. Maybe I shouldn't have started reading here at all.....