Depends on what currency. If it's in GBP then it's pushing it really, I guess the limiting factor is how good is the monitor?
The keyboard and mouse don't look to be worth much money
That KB and mouse was the Apple standard for 5+ years my friend. You talk about them like they are something cheap and generic. Far from it..
That KB and mouse was the Apple standard for 5+ years my friend. You talk about them like they are something cheap and generic. Far from it..
To the OP:
The dual 2.3GHz is the most reliable system of all the G5 towers and the price is fair for what is included. I simply comes down to how much your desire to buy it.
I think I really need sleep as i'm not even typing grammatically correct and leaving out letters here and there.
Been up working on hardware for about 32 hours. Wooo!@#
Well if we did a straight currency conversion then that comes out at £230, which with the included monitor and keyboard seems pretty good to me. - although I'm not sure how much $375 is actually worth in the US, I think you guys have everything priced slightly cheaper which may or may not make it good value for money. I got my G5 Quad for £270 and that was without the upgraded RAM or monitor - although it did come with a nice keyboard which I'm using now
Is the 2.3GHz dual or not?
i want it badly but i just really wanted to see what the community thought about it.
My question to you is, why do you want this particular machine so badly?
I mean, Apple is starting to completely phase out PowerPC support. PPC users, myself included, are lucky that Apple is still releasing universal versions of their apps. However, I don't think that support will last beyond 2011, especially once OS X Lion is released.
That hurts my feelings...there are still people who are not willing to part with PPC machines. Don't question what we want, ask yourself what you want and satisfy it.
That hurts my feelings...there are still people who are not willing to part with PPC machines. Don't question what we want, ask yourself what you want and satisfy it.
While Apple might not, there are 1000's of other minor developers still making programs for the PowerPC and there are plenty out there who are devoted to keeping the platform alive.. Again, both PPC and Intel have their uses.. for everyday use and some pro app work, a PPC is a good choice.. for heavy multi-threaded work and audio + rendering work, the Intel Mac Pro or any other Intel machine is recommended..
Right now I have a 2010 Mac Pro that I use for everyday purposes of which I have moved back to my PowerBook G4 1.67 for most of that.. Now its a matter of when I am in the mood to sit in my chair do I then use my mac pro. I felt I spent 700 for the 6-core for nothing only to just prolong this machine, as I seriously doubt the Sandy Bridge is going to make a huge difference. Plus, this is my LAST mac pro.
Agreed.. why bash something you have no idea about? Do I bash Intel? No, I like my Mac Pro... but since I am not using it to its full potential, nor do I plan to do any video editing or serious animation work.. all I did was get the Mac Pro as if it were a Power Mac for everyday purposes.
Running Windows 7 on it and Youtube all day isn't very productive.
The guy is equating computers to toasters.. Wow.
iMikeT: Go engulf yourself in intel and leave us to our own devices.
Not once did I bash anything. Keep in mind that I'm still on a PPC Mac myself, though not entirely by choice. It would behove you to reread what it was that I stated in my previous post. I simply stated what I think Apple will ultimately do to PPC. I'm sure there are people out there that still whine about how Apple ditched Classic support in favor of OS X, and it has been 10 years since Apple introduced OS X. Gotta move on at some point people...
How obsessed can people be with the past? If I were to apply the same logic you're using to other things found in my home, I suppose that the company that made the 14 year old toaster in my house better be ready when it needs a part replaced.