Re: Oh my God!!!
Originally posted by dukestreet
I won't be satisfied until I can do realtime 3D animation with radiosity, which won't happen anytime soon, years at least.
Yeah, that would be nice. Don't compromise your principles. You wait for a computer that can do that before you buy anything. See you in 2057 or so.
Originally posted by Grokgod
"why would you need more speed than a 667!"
I personally find this an incredulous question.
Are you still in OS9?
Over $3000 dollars for a 667 with a 4200 rpm drive.
I didn't say you couldn't
use of more speed. I questioned your notion that the machine is somehow crippled without it.
Now, let's talk about this "4200 rpm" thing. That is the STANDARD for notebook hard drives. Toshiba claims to have announced "the industry's first 9.5mm 5400 RPM drive family" in a press release dated February 6 of this year. IBM, of course, had a single 48GB drive at 5400 RPM prior to that (they've since added others, including the new 60GB), but I think the word "family" technically prevents the Toshiba press release from being a lie. But at the time the TiBook released, there was only the one IBM drive...
and it was available, BTO, on the TiBook. Still is. I expect the next rev, whenever that is, will offer the 60 as well.
I had a 667 Ti for about a week before returning it.
I truly found it extremely frustrating to work on.
OSX was very unresponsive and my basic work flow was painfully slow.
I'm using OS X constantly. As soon as I get Photoshop 7 I won't need to start Classic at all. If you're saying that just basic navigation of the operating system is slow, then I can think of no more charitable explanation than to call you a liar. Please don't hyperbolize your experiences.
You didn't specify exactly what your workflow is. I find lightweight Photoshop work more than tolerable (hell,
basic Photoshop work was
tolerable on my old iBook 466). But if I were working on large-format Photoshop projects with lots of filters, or doing lots of 3D modeling and rendering, then I wouldn't really expect
any portable to be satisfying.
In fact, for my own part, I admit that compiling large Windows projects using VPC5 on the TiBook is a little frustrating compared to the same task on a native Windows desktop machine. Is anyone really shocked by this result? Personally, I find it pretty impressive that it's fast enough that I can get work done at all under VPC when I'm out of the office.