Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
jade said:
Sorry but my two windows xp boxes haven't crashed for at least 4 months since upgrading...and while they were on Win 98 (yup 98) we regularlly made it through 6 month stretches. Windows isn't as crash prone as people here make it out to be. It is more related to user error than anything else, but with a little bit of regular matenence your computer will be fine. (spyware on the other hand need more regular checks)

Four months? Six months? Did you miss where I said that my iBook has never crashed, and my eMac has been crash-free for two years? For some people, Windows isn't as crash prone as it's made out to be, but for the vast majority of people I know, it's terrible. As with most things, what matters isn't that prosumer and professional users like you and I don't have issues... It's that the home users, who I end up supporting through their crises, are crashing left and right - on Windows.

So stop lying, I have used PCs for 20 years, and had very few serious crashes that I can remember. My Win 98 Vaio notebook only crashed 2 times during its 4 years of use.

I'm not lying, and there's no way you can verify your claims, any more than I can, when it comes to personal experience. I've used Apple for about 20 years (my first computer was bought in 1983, but it wasn't a mac), and PCs for around 15, and I have always, always had more problems out of the Wintel/x86 world.
 
a lot more windows users are happy than you think

The vast majority of my PCs problems in the past have been solved by a restart (except on my Dad's machine..... he is also known as a hardware killer). Ofthe few that are left they required reinstalling drivers (on my Dad's machine of course, not on mine) and then 1 "required" a reinstall of the OS....although I think that was my neighborhood PC fix-it-shop being lazy. (again on my Dad's machine)

So far I have had a couple not waking up from sleep problems on my ibook during my 1st month of use. These required restarts.....and on the powerbook I used at my previous employed, during 6 months..I had many more not waking up from sleep problems, one kernal panic, and 4-5 freezes requiring reboots. Macs have had aproximately the same or slightly worse in terms of "crash-prone-ness" than PCs. Just my observation.

Overall I completely agree that using a mac at home means less calling your pc expert friends to help with your computer... but a good chunk of the windows users I know only rely on that method once every 6 months or so...so the mac premium isn't really worth it for them. In general I notice 95% of mac problems are solved by a restart or permissions repair where in windows the solutions tend to be more complicated. The number of problems per year has decresed greatly on all platforms, computers are getting more reliable in many cases, I just hate to see people saying windows crashes everytime you turn on your computer....because that really doesn't happen very frequently.
 
If your PC only consists only of quality hardware, stability is definitely not a problem anymore in the short term. But I have heard several times if you installed XP when it came out in October 2001 and did not install anything since then, you will be forced to reinstall these days because it appears that after running for 2.5 years XP has turned itself unstable due to bad programming. On the other hand there are many Mac User who have been using their Macs for much longer than 2.5 years without reinstalling the OS.
 
I have a bimbows Box

I have a bimbows box running XP.....(2.0 GHz P4, 512 MB Ram, etc)

I just did a fresh install of professional XP and the only thing I installed (other than those really annoying stupid WinBlows updtaes that occur every day) is Mozilla.


I ran Mozilla 20 times(I made a tally chart)...It crashed 8.....

Seriously, if you can't run Mozilla without the damn thing crashing....is this any sign of stability? Probably not....
but.....

13 years of using Wintel computers shows me one thing: They are not Stable.

In fact, it doesn't even have the equivelant of a "force quit" it just requests the program to shut.....

An app can crash on a mac and not affect the rest of the system, but as most PC users told me: If it crashes once, the system wil most likely go with it and it is best to reboot...


BTW: The systems that were running were All the most updated version of Win. XP Prof.
 
AppleJustWorks said:
I have a bimbows box running XP.....(2.0 GHz P4, 512 MB Ram, etc)

I just did a fresh install of professional XP and the only thing I installed (other than those really annoying stupid WinBlows updtaes that occur every day) is Mozilla.


I ran Mozilla 20 times(I made a tally chart)...It crashed 8.....

Seriously, if you can't run Mozilla without the damn thing crashing....is this any sign of stability? Probably not....
but.....
Ha! I've been using FireFox on Windows XP for a while and never had a problem. It's my main browser. My XP box is very stable. I haven't had a crash in over 6 months and I've ghosted the drive.
 
thatwendigo said:
I rarely crashed under 6, 7, 8, or 9, and when I did, it was pretty clearly badly written third-party code or my fault for tinkering with something. I did that a lot. Existing alongside Windows on a fairly constant basis (friends and school), I got to experience an awful lot more crashes away from home than I ever did there, even though I used the computer more at home than I used any machine anywhere else.



I've been using OS X since the public beta. You know how many times I've crashed, installed across my family's seven macs, and my own two. Since it debuted, I've experienced a grand total of five kernel panics across nine installs, each one an early adopted of the next version. I even had the developer release of Panther, and it never crashed on me.

By contrast, my roommate's XP box has had to be reinstalled five times since he got XP about a year ago, one of my coworkers had to reinstall it after he and I ran a driver disk for his wireless bridge (while the Airport in my iBook worked flawlessly from day one), and I constantly have to help other coworkers with driver issues, virii, and just about anything else that could go wrong in Windows. My dad's Panther box at work plays nicer on their corporate network than the Windows machiens do, and they're using things like ActiveDirctory!

So, no, I'm not clueless on what I'm talking about. I just don't break the OS as a matter of habit, and I see Windows go down, all around me, all the time. I could go into the problems my school had with their Wintel boxes, if you'd like...



Citation, please. This is a common claim, a common assumption, but one that is rarely backed up in any meaningful manner.



My religion, as you call it, is born of workflow, elegance, and ease of use. When Microsoft and AMD/Intel begin to approximate what I can do on a mac, I will take them seriously. Until then, they're possibly faster, but far less reliable or beneficial.

I have all kinds of rational reasons for my positions, and I am far from the typical "Apple Zealot." Take a look through my old posts, if you don't beleive it.

Dude.. I serously love posts like this. Nice job. I totally agree, and you put it perfectally.
 
thatwendigo said:
Four months? Six months? Did you miss where I said that my iBook has never crashed, and my eMac has been crash-free for two years? For some people, Windows isn't as crash prone as it's made out to be, but for the vast majority of people I know, it's terrible. As with most things, what matters isn't that prosumer and professional users like you and I don't have issues... It's that the home users, who I end up supporting through their crises, are crashing left and right - on Windows.

Yep, you hit the nail on the head with that one - I am in the same boat as you, as I have to constantly repair problems on friends' and coworkers' Windows boxes, often problems that I shake my head at because they are so stupid and unecessary - you would never see such problems on a Mac, but thanks to the guys who wrote Windows... And I'm sorry if the above sounds cliche, but from my experiences, this is simply the truth!


thatwendigo said:
I'm not lying, and there's no way you can verify your claims, any more than I can, when it comes to personal experience. I've used Apple for about 20 years (my first computer was bought in 1983, but it wasn't a mac), and PCs for around 15, and I have always, always had more problems out of the Wintel/x86 world.

I can't say I've used a Mac (or computers in general, for that matter!) as long as you have, but this has been my experience as well - PCs have always caused me more trouble, and for me, that's simply the way it is - perhaps for other people, their experiences are different, which is fair enough. I'm not trying to over-generalize by any means.

Oh, and as for calling thatwendigo a liar, he can easily stand up for himself, but may I just add that those types of immature, irrational comments are not required in these forums, okay? We don't need to insult people, and in this case, make claims that obviously are unwarranted - thatwendigo's comments are not lies, simply because he was speaking from personal experience. Please post more intelligently in the future.
 
ghiangelo said:
read it and wonder

http://appleinsider.com/article.php?id=416

well the wait is going to be longer than thought... not to mention what sort of configurations are going to be available...

ghi

There doesn't appear to be anything exciting happening at Apple on the hardware side of things. I'm hoping that maybe Apple will introduce some nice new displays. Some anniversary year so far, huh?

(Someone posted somewhere a comment about GarageBand. Briefly, I think the comment was something to the effect that it didn't make sense to introduce a CPU intensive program like GB when the computers Apple was offering were inadequate. Now I think this post was right on. Why would Apple bother to introduce such a computing intensive program as the new iLife if they weren't prepared to introduce new G5s and iMacs? I'm beginning to sympathize with those who say they wish Apple would design all its software for the PC market, and have Apple get completely out of the hardware business -- other than iPods and the like.)
 
thatwendigo said:
I'm not lying, and there's no way you can verify your claims, any more than I can, when it comes to personal experience.

Sorry I didn't mean lying literally....the word I probably should have used is exaggerated claims of crashing.

I do no think that your experiences solving windows probs are any less valid than my overall pleasant experiences....sometimes it seems as if people come down a little hard on windows failure rate.
 
numediaman said:
(Someone posted somewhere a comment about GarageBand. Briefly, I think the comment was something to the effect that it didn't make sense to introduce a CPU intensive program like GB when the computers Apple was offering were inadequate. Now I think this post was right on. Why would Apple bother to introduce such a computing intensive program as the new iLife if they weren't prepared to introduce new G5s and iMacs? I'm beginning to sympathize with those who say they wish Apple would design all its software for the PC market, and have Apple get completely out of the hardware business -- other than iPods and the like.)
I'm sorry, but not able to handle Garageband? I've been running Pro Tools 6.1 (a REAL audio software program) on Os 10.2.8 on an old dual 500 g4 and it runs fine (could be faster but the machine's 4 years old). I can't even imagine how efficient it would be on a new g5 or even a powerbook g4, no one I know is unhappy with apples for audio processing. Dual 2.0 g5 is plenty of power. However, I wouldn't mind the 2.6, in fact I'm holding out for it. As well as the new 23" HD display. MMMM, MMMM BeeITCH! (As dave would say).
 
Bhennies said:
I'm sorry, but not able to handle Garageband? I've been running Pro Tools 6.1 (a REAL audio software program) on Os 10.2.8 on an old dual 500 g4 and it runs fine (could be faster but the machine's 4 years old). I can't even imagine how efficient it would be on a new g5 or even a powerbook g4, no one I know is unhappy with apples for audio processing. Dual 2.0 g5 is plenty of power. However, I wouldn't mind the 2.6, in fact I'm holding out for it. As well as the new 23" HD display. MMMM, MMMM BeeITCH! (As dave would say).

I do a tremendous amount of audio work -- but I wouldn't even consider the G5 until they fix the Power Supply issue. Look on the Apple support discussion boards, its ugly.

But I think the real point here is that Apple is introducing some pretty good software -- but where is the hardware to match? I'm very happy with Panther, Final Cut, iLife, etc. but why am I left wishing I could run this stuff on a PC? I'd rather run it on a Mac, but Apple seems completely disinterested in their computer division (or their engineering or manufacturing management are out to lunch). Its 24 hours of iPod at Apple now-a-days.
 
numediaman said:
I do a tremendous amount of audio work -- but I wouldn't even consider the G5 until they fix the Power Supply issue. Look on the Apple support discussion boards, its ugly.

But I think the real point here is that Apple is introducing some pretty good software -- but where is the hardware to match? I'm very happy with Panther, Final Cut, iLife, etc. but why am I left wishing I could run this stuff on a PC? I'd rather run it on a Mac, but Apple seems completely disinterested in their computer division (or their engineering or manufacturing management are out to lunch). Its 24 hours of iPod at Apple now-a-days.
man have you said it, the software division rules the hardware guys suck a turd, look at Imac,Emac,ibook, and single g5s. not one of these machines comes close to the otherside, Im sorry Apple but you can only screw me so long on hardware until enough is enough. you farted around a year when you should have intoduced a G5imac to make up up for years of dicking around with G4 & G3s. No excuse to be extorting Mac user's all these years. Sick of the Crap. Release OSX for Windows if your going to keep pushing Hardware Crap. Im about to order ALIENWARE and then can walk into my neighborhood Wal-Mart for everything i need for it.
 
numediaman said:
I do a tremendous amount of audio work -- but I wouldn't even consider the G5 until they fix the Power Supply issue. Look on the Apple support discussion boards, its ugly.

But I think the real point here is that Apple is introducing some pretty good software -- but where is the hardware to match? I'm very happy with Panther, Final Cut, iLife, etc. but why am I left wishing I could run this stuff on a PC? I'd rather run it on a Mac, but Apple seems completely disinterested in their computer division (or their engineering or manufacturing management are out to lunch). Its 24 hours of iPod at Apple now-a-days.
Yeah, I feel you. I certainly don't want a rev A g5 either. Or the old displays for that matter. I'm waiting just like you. I am hoping that Apple will come through and really drop a kick a$$ machine this summer. We'll see. I have money burning in my pocket. However, i've gotta say that PC's aren't great either. I think we just forget that all computers suck to a certain degree. My parents have a PC laptop with XP, and they've got a bunch of boxes of uninstalled hardware sitting around that they couldn't get to work (CD burner, scanner, etc.). Getting wireless set up on that machine was a nightmare (i was in town to help out and it took us a whole weekend with several patches, long tech support phone calls, etc.) My mom's getting a Powerbook as soon as they're updated, she's ready to try apple. I have the feeling that she's not alone.
 
When I started working at a new job back in November, I thought new G5's would be out by the time I had enough money saved up to buy them (3-4 months). Of course.. I was wrong.

This is really starting to get annoying. Faced with the prospect of waiting 3 months for an overpriced (and overdue) machine while having to use an unbearably slow computer & have no productivity whatsoever... I'm not all too fond of Apple at the moment.

Have they forgotten that they have relatively few customers and are fighting for a larger market share? Like a few others on here, I'm really wondering if struggling with an old, slow machine and waiting for 9-12 months for updates really leaves me better off than dealing with an annoying OS with more software, on cheaper hardware, available now.

And I'm a developer! If a few others are starting to think like I am, the MacOS could see even fewer software apps available.

Loyalty is keeping me waiting. It won't keep me waiting forever.

Apple has to reward that loyalty, not take it for granted and treat their customers poorly. I don't want to see Steve Jobs strolling around on a stage with a water bottle and making extraordinary (and false) claims months from now. I want a new G5 sitting in front of me that I can put to use NOW.
 
MrSugar said:
Dude.. I serously love posts like this. Nice job. I totally agree, and you put it perfectally.

Gracias, me compadre.

~Shard~ said:
Yep, you hit the nail on the head with that one - I am in the same boat as you, as I have to constantly repair problems on friends' and coworkers' Windows boxes, often problems that I shake my head at because they are so stupid and unecessary - you would never see such problems on a Mac, but thanks to the guys who wrote Windows... And I'm sorry if the above sounds cliche, but from my experiences, this is simply the truth!

The worst part of it all, though, is that I have to keep touching Windows. Ewwwww! :p No, actually, the worst aspect of it is that I have to provide support for an OS that, were these people to spend what they'd pay a professional to fix these things, they'd be able to buy a mac and not have the problem.

I can't say I've used a Mac (or computers in general, for that matter!) as long as you have, but this has been my experience as well - PCs have always caused me more trouble, and for me, that's simply the way it is - perhaps for other people, their experiences are different, which is fair enough. I'm not trying to over-generalize by any means.

What can I say? I was programming in BASIC when I was five. :cool:

Oh, and as for calling thatwendigo a liar, he can easily stand up for himself, but may I just add that those types of immature, irrational comments are not required in these forums, okay? We don't need to insult people, and in this case, make claims that obviously are unwarranted - thatwendigo's comments are not lies, simply because he was speaking from personal experience. Please post more intelligently in the future.

Thanks for the backup, in any case. As always, Shard, it's been a pleasure.

numediaman said:
I'm beginning to sympathize with those who say they wish Apple would design all its software for the PC market, and have Apple get completely out of the hardware business -- other than iPods and the like.

Ah, so you're another one of the people who want Apple dead, as opposed to alive, debt-free, and still ramping up into the new archtecture and constantly improving the OS? See, OS X would be cracked, pirated, and otherwise screwed over instantly by the vast majority of people who wanted to give it a try, and the ones who might pay for it (consumers) would still not have the Windows compatibility that's its biggest problem in the current market.

Repeat after me:
Rumors and dreams of Apple on x86 are the mind kille. Rumors and dreams of Apple on x86 are the little death. I will let them move over and through me, and when they are gone, only I will remain. :D

jade said:
Sorry I didn't mean lying literally....the word I probably should have used is exaggerated claims of crashing.

I do no think that your experiences solving windows probs are any less valid than my overall pleasant experiences....sometimes it seems as if people come down a little hard on windows failure rate.

Apology accepted.

Also, just to be fair, I'm willing to accept that people have perfectly aceptable, and even pleasant, experiences with Windows, just as I'm willing to grant that you could be having as many issues with macs as you say you are. I know that they happen, but they just don't seem to happen to me, or to anyone I know.

numediaman said:
But I think the real point here is that Apple is introducing some pretty good software -- but where is the hardware to match? I'm very happy with Panther, Final Cut, iLife, etc. but why am I left wishing I could run this stuff on a PC? I'd rather run it on a Mac, but Apple seems completely disinterested in their computer division (or their engineering or manufacturing management are out to lunch). Its 24 hours of iPod at Apple now-a-days.

*hand-talk motions*

Okay, let's try this again, for the DHMs and others in the audience... The fact that Apple hasn't updated the G5 yet, hasn't released a whole new PowerBook, or done any of these other things that people want doesn't mean anything about their engineering or manufacturing arms. There are half a million things (conservatively) that can go wrong in a big business, and Apple's in the unique position of having even more than their competitors, considering how much proprietary, in-house work goes into their machines. That says nothing of their specific manufacturing needs (G5 ASIC, anyone?), or the supply line that feeds them their modified or exclusive components (graphics cards, controllers, motherboards, and so on), or the issues that might come from trying to integrate the new chips. Circuit design isn't simple. That's why you typically have to have a degree for it, especially in something like computing.

Dont Hurt Me said:
Im sorry Apple but you can only screw me so long on hardware until enough is enough. you farted around a year when you should have intoduced a G5imac to make up up for years of dicking around with G4 & G3s. No excuse to be extorting Mac user's all these years. Sick of the Crap. Release OSX for Windows if your going to keep pushing Hardware Crap. Im about to order ALIENWARE and then can walk into my neighborhood Wal-Mart for everything i need for it.

Go! Jesus Christ, go and quit spouting this ridiculous rhetoric that Apple will never see, read, or alter their policies over. If you're naive enough to think that a company will change for one person, or alter a successful strategy just because people are whining on boards they don't even own, then we're better off without you. The mac is a premium computer that isn't traded only on speed, even though it is more than swift enough as it stands, for the price points its positioned at. You pay for the design, the experience, the integration, and the ability to use OS X. If you're not willing to pay for that, then stop your crying about it and go vote with your dollars.

You want Apple to hear you? Buy something else.
 
Dont Hurt Me said:
Im about to order ALIENWARE and then can walk into my neighborhood Wal-Mart for everything i need for it.
Duff-Man says....are you still here? Please, go buy your great alienware computer running that fantastic OS...your whining has become soooooo redundant...oh yeah!
 
Bhennies said:
I'm sorry, but not able to handle Garageband? I've been running Pro Tools 6.1 (a REAL audio software program) on Os 10.2.8 on an old dual 500 g4 and it runs fine (could be faster but the machine's 4 years old). I can't even imagine how efficient it would be on a new g5 or even a powerbook g4, no one I know is unhappy with apples for audio processing. Dual 2.0 g5 is plenty of power. However, I wouldn't mind the 2.6, in fact I'm holding out for it. As well as the new 23" HD display. MMMM, MMMM BeeITCH! (As dave would say).


Try out garageband..it will kill even the mightiest pro tools machines. I have used it on emacs, g4 ibooks, 1.6 g5s and powerbooks. You get to about 6-8 virtual instrunment tracks and you have reached system overload...on all of the machines. All of the current machines are fine for protools, but suck for garageband! In fact what I hear is that most pro apps run better on current macs than garage band does. Pretty sad right.

Two solutions
1. new hardware
2. some tweaks so it isn't as processor intensive


Go to your apple store and try about 8 "green tracks" with maybe 3-4 "blue" tracks.....then hit play...watch it stutter, see system overload window. Repeat. I think it is pretty unacceptable.
 
Dont Hurt Me said:
man have you said it, the software division rules the hardware guys suck a turd, look at Imac,Emac,ibook, and single g5s. not one of these machines comes close to the otherside, Im sorry Apple but you can only screw me so long on hardware until enough is enough. you farted around a year when you should have intoduced a G5imac to make up up for years of dicking around with G4 & G3s. No excuse to be extorting Mac user's all these years. Sick of the Crap. Release OSX for Windows if your going to keep pushing Hardware Crap. Im about to order ALIENWARE and then can walk into my neighborhood Wal-Mart for everything i need for it.

THEN SHUT UP AND DO IT! I AM SO SICK OF THIS! DO IT!!! ORDER YOUR OVER PRICED ALIENWARE AND LEAVE!

In all seriousness, no one around here gives a crap about what computer you pick. Guess what APPLE IS A HARDWARE company, THEY live off hardware.. that is how they EARN MONEY! You are stupid to think they would survive in the PC software market.

Please buy you alienware, and leave.. I don't even have any PC respect for you, you could at least save a thousand dollars and build it yourself, utilize the only real advantage that PC's have over Mac... but no.. you want to pay some overpriced PC maker for big plastic lit up flashy case! GOOD, DO IT! Please go run XP and enjoy talking on these forums about how fast your computer is running counter-strike.... NOBODY CARES!
 
thatwendigo said:
Also, just to be fair, I'm willing to accept that people have perfectly aceptable, and even pleasant, experiences with Windows, just as I'm willing to grant that you could be having as many issues with macs as you say you are. I know that they happen, but they just don't seem to happen to me, or to anyone I know.
Seems you're the common factor with these winders problems. ;)
 
gossas said:
Seems you're the common factor with these winders problems. ;)

I'm only common, in that I'm the one who has to figure out what they've screwed up this time. That, and I bring my iBook with me to test networks, and so on, since it plays nicer than Windows does.

Although, there was the story I never quite told... I have a very Neo-like power over the PIIIs that my school bought, years ago, when I was still in a public system (highschool). I could walk by a classroom, hold out my hand and say 'crash,' and the machine would within an hour. I'd always go back and check with the teacher, under the guise of trying to help them with the problem. :D

Of course, the sysadmin at my school was a moron. It was far less likely that a given machine would be working properly, with no issues, than it was that we'd get any use out of them. Blah. The PPC 9600 in the photography department was so much more useful...
 
jade said:
Try out garageband..it will kill even the mightiest pro tools machines. I have used it on emacs, g4 ibooks, 1.6 g5s and powerbooks. You get to about 6-8 virtual instrunment tracks and you have reached system overload...on all of the machines. All of the current machines are fine for protools, but suck for garageband! In fact what I hear is that most pro apps run better on current macs than garage band does. Pretty sad right.

Two solutions
1. new hardware
2. some tweaks so it isn't as processor intensive


Go to your apple store and try about 8 "green tracks" with maybe 3-4 "blue" tracks.....then hit play...watch it stutter, see system overload window. Repeat. I think it is pretty unacceptable.

It's insane to compare GB to PT, because GB heavily relies on the internal processor and PT relies heavily on the DSP farm.
 
On another thread, I remember posting that they could wait until june or july before doing any power mac updates; however, I wasn't really convinced, at the time, that they would, or should, wait so long...Any news confirming that they are going to wait until June to announce updates, is probably much more likely accurate, whether by accident or knowledge, than anything which portended sooner releases.

It also means a power mac refresh cycle of 1 year. I wonder if that will be the normal refresh frequency from now on.

On the good side, it could mean that Steve really is going to keep that promise of 3ghz by the same time next year, seeing as how announcing something in june WWDC, would coincide with the exact time he claimed they would be at 3ghz..

Now, We bring you back to your regularly scheduled program: Off-topic badmouthing. Carry on.
 
NOV said:
It's insane to compare GB to PT, because GB heavily relies on the internal processor and PT relies heavily on the DSP farm.

OK makes sense...but it still doesn't make up for the fact that current Apple products can't hang with GB. :confused:
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.