The Best of the BEST
-So, are you including everyone who is using some part of the Amiga architecture as an Amiga clone? Or are you referring to all versions of the Amiga OS running on any
type of hardware? You refer to running a G5 Amiga. Do you mean Amiga OS on Apple, IBM, or other hardware? Or is this just a theory?
First, its not some partits all of it, the real-time mutitasking.Its not Amiga with that archane archticture of the ibc or mac world.I mean would you call a yugo a Ferrai just becasue it has Ferrai painted on it ,of course not. Anotehr thin the mac nor the Ibm compatible can truly handle the Amgia os . yes , you have an emmulator or can get one ,but its no where near the speed nor does it have the other needful things that really make it the true Amiga os. A handicapped os as it would be called. Heck the Orginal G4 2.5 ghz real-time ppc only exsist on Amigas and with the moive monguls. So yes a G5 can be put on any Amiga without getting or makigna special motherboard or like wise and ALpha chip due to the great archtiecture of the Amiga. LikeI said -before the Amgia can use any CPU. Now if you use north or soutbridge its old archane adn wouldnt be considered an Amiga by Nasa or nybody in their right mind. Ask steve Jobs/Bil Gates about that.
I cant provide links saying that ,but consider holllywood Tv Stationsand alike . With the Amiga its called the silent majority. Can you give me a link for Mac beating a Pegasos or let alone an Amiga. Yet you ok maybe not you,but makes does. On the flip side Ican give you links where Mac loses to he Pegasos -even if Pegasos uses a the same a hardware ,but slower PPC.
Ye liek I said berfore the AMgai is faster still and you canfind that. jsu tlook fro yourself on Google. Plus my website which answers all the millions of users and speed Its not my opinion but facts. These statments are taken from SGI users to Gateway and Intel , IBM themselves.
-I agree that Amiga can be very fast, but from the benchmarks I have seen the fastest performance was demonstrated on x86 systems using an Amiga emulator.
You have to remeber thats from Amiga forever they dont show realbench marks. Oh yeha it takes a PIV pc to get anywhere near a Amiga1000. That is just raw power so that benchmark is off. Lets see now you cant multitask or the true 64bit like on the Amiga . SO that all has to be taken into affect. ie a 486 120mhz is faster then a 386 200mhz or more so when comparing an Amiga due to the Amiga advanced design.
When you really try to multitask you crash. In otherwards come to a compelte stop. So standing still isnt going to be as fast as an Amiga no matter how slow the slowest Amiga is. Which would be right out of the box A1000 prototype.
If you have great programs and a great os you dont need protected memory or the Amiga would crash an awful lot which in fact it is the most stable. like I said the stements about the emmlator being faster are out right lies. The orginal System(pc,mac) itelf is slower .now when it emmulates its goin to be even slower. That is a known fact . I expained up a parargraph or 2 again why that bogus statement on the emmualtor is a lie. Hell Im far from bias I admit the Amgias short commings and it has far less then the rest which is why I and millions others choose it. TO be not advertised and yet still be made clones of and recognized and used that tells about its superior technology and people wanting to use it. Mac os has more right . We made Samba and other liek it in 82 . The orginals actually work with newer pcs with xp. cant saytha tabout mac os. like i Said the mac os is half baked and Linus Trovald has said so. The Amgia os is True UNIX . Which is one of the many major reasons it can do true-real-time multitasking.
Yeah the Amiga doesnt crash as offten it has datatypes which make drivers look like **** . No reason for registry. Nope MAc os doesn even come close.
The speed is no maybe its a fact go to pegagos and see just how it beats the mac . Lets see running mac os thru linux faster then he mac os x and oh yeah running the apps faster on the amgia also. hiumm yep Amiga rocks yet again.
miga does however have enough to be of some interest, which is why I mentioned the possibilty of a purchase by Apple.
Actually I mentioned it first ,but it wouldnt happen as it was prevented by the community . For reason I wont go in here ,but suffice to say it makes the mac coummnity look like crap.
Leik I siad the hardware of the mac and the pc(ibc) is the same. So no the Aimga os would do ****ty. YOu dont understand becasue of these comments you made. You dont evne udnerstand why you have archane hardware. CPU is the best ok Itanium(PaRisc) beats it. Amiga is hardware and sofware. Not software alone,which software is all you people think of . An os makes a system wrong, both do and the hardware more so beacuse you can improve the os alot easier. Hence Amiga is Amiga because of its Superior Archtiecture and Superior OS. Amiga I cant call classic until the hombre comes out until then none can touch her. Full Boot option boy are you far behind we have been able to boot win,linux,mac os and Amiga os at the exact time in real-time fro ages. Its like dam I didnt realize we could do this oh yeah its Amiga we can. Hence the Slogan: Only Amiga makes it possible. -The classic ones as you call them.
Which you cant you have to boot one or the other then go not the other. Or at worst boot the other os instead.
Ok are os looks dated but we can improve it many ways (skins),and we use the vastly superior RGB True RGB not VGA to RGB or jsut plain RGB. Then you say its not the standard well tell that to millions of Tv users. Secondly if it wasnt the standard why try to emmualte it. I do mean try.
The Amiga is the standard from miltary design and making to the systems running miltiary ships. Plus interfacing with Hanger 18 stuff. The particular true standard is what this world is run on and why intel and sony are the first to go towards the light.-The Amiga.
i appreciate tis discssion .
AE system is truly modular liek I eplained before hence nonbias ,we have slow raw power cpu. But endusers just get on the net and alike, and for that no matter how fast you get, ok light speed will beat us%), youll be slower.
When a person wants to render faster he just adds another cpu. Without changing the motherboard, again superor technology. Hence the term renederign farm .
Several of these things I metioned earlier and Im reapeating. I have said the facts, and I really dont care what the next true Amiga is called(same topology and theology)design and archtiecture outlook. All I know One is going to be called the PS3 the other the Mckinly(Intel) the first out will be ahead. Like I said before check the whicte spec(sheet) on both compared to the hombre and they are the same,well PS3 might use the G6/G5 or the Itanium who knows. even mac has plans to copy it ,but it had to wait for what has happaned, mainly the demise of commodore. So we might have a third if mac last long enough. Which I do hope they do, more competion. Hum cheaper prices .
thanks fro the fun I do hate repeating myself and correcting arrors over and over again so email me for my phone number, or I will call you when you give it to me via email.
This discussion has sparked knowledge for you and others who would like to know,and I appreciate it.
Thanks
HombreOne
