PowerMac G4 SATA-PCI-Card Owners, post your real life benchmarks!

Discussion in 'PowerPC Macs' started by Cox Orange, May 27, 2013.

  1. Cox Orange macrumors 68000

    Jan 1, 2010
    Since benchmarks come up recently again and are referred to every now and then, I thought I search for some insight to a question I asked myself.

    What is real life speed and are benchmark utilities anything useful? My point is no.

    If I connect two SATA-drives to a SATA-PCI-card in a PowerMac G4 (AGP), I get between 33-39MB/s, when copying a file from one HDD to another. I found someone that found out the same.

    So, if someone be so kind and help me and copy a file from one drive to another on his/her SATA-PCI-cards and stop the time.

    Don't use utilities, just stop the time and divide the file size through the time elapsed (in seconds).

    I am really risking proving to be a fool, but then again I want to know, if anyone has the speeds they always report from their xbench, quickbench and AJA-tests.

    Please forgive me!

    PS: I used 5400rpm Drives, with 2MB and 10k rpm Drives and others, but all are in the range of 33-39MB/s. I used a 5GB, 20GB DV-file (iMovie) and several files gathered to one copying action of 800GB (some DV-files up to 40GB under them).
    What makes it even worse is, I have Sonnet and Newertech CPU Upgrades, so the evildoer is not the slow stock CPU.
  2. Cox Orange thread starter macrumors 68000

    Jan 1, 2010
    Hm, no one?

    Is there suddenly no one with a PowerMac G4 anymore? Is it you find my question stupid anyway? Or am I right and the truth is so embarrassing and shocking?
  3. Antonius macrumors member

    Apr 26, 2013
    In a few months I'll be buying myself an SATA PCI card for my MDD and I'll add my benchmarks here
  4. philz4life, May 29, 2013
    Last edited: May 29, 2013

    philz4life macrumors member

    Jan 15, 2013
    I recently got a SATA PCI card for my Powermac G4.. I can't do any tests the way you want because my SSD is the only drive on the card.
  5. philz4life macrumors member

    Jan 15, 2013
    Here's my benchmarks, the SATA SSD has a disappointingly small performance lead.

    Attached Files:

  6. MisterKeeks macrumors 68000


    Nov 15, 2012
    The goal is to find out whether the utilities produce anything useful. Though you could use them and compare.

    HOWEVER, read and write speeds can vary based on the size of the file. Hard disks excel at large files.
  7. skinniezinho macrumors 65816

    Jan 1, 2009
    Here are the benchmarks for my Vertex 2 fw1.37
    Sonnet Tempo Sata PCI , fw5.1.3

    Powermac G4 GE fw4.2.8
    Sonnet 1.2GHz CPU
    2GB PC133



    Guess it is the max of controller/pci bus.

    There are some threads with more benchmarks like this or search for SSD.
  8. seveej macrumors 6502a


    Dec 14, 2009
    Helsinki, Finland
    I have a Sonnet Tempo two port SATA card in my MDD, and can not provide you with a "copy from one disk to another" speed, as they are in (soft)RAID.

    What I can say, is that when transferring files over the (gigabit) network to and from that RAID stack, the transfer speeds are within the 60-80 MBps bracket.

    The disks are 2 TB Seagate Barracuda Green's (those weird drives with an rpm of 5900 - that's not a typo).

  9. 666sheep macrumors 68040


    Dec 7, 2009
    Kinda. To get comparable results one should have your exact files. That's why we use benchmarks.
  10. Doward macrumors 6502a

    Feb 21, 2013
    Please keep in mind that the PCI bus max is usually 133MB/s, and is shared with other subsystems.

    Copying from one drive to another, I'm unsurprised by that 33MB/s average - after all, you are both reading AND writing at the same time on the PCI bus.
  11. Cox Orange, May 31, 2013
    Last edited: May 31, 2013

    Cox Orange thread starter macrumors 68000

    Jan 1, 2010
    Can you redoo the test like I had described?
    You are right, but I tested 5GB, 20GB and 800GB not much of a difference.
    Do you have a second drive, to do the test like I described in my first post? If not, you could copy a file one that one Drive, just out of curiosity for me, perhaps?
    OK, that must be with a really good NAS and a Gigabit-ethernet-PCI card, I guess? I heard, that the on board Gigabit ethernet port of the G4s is slow and that the consumer NASes are slow, too.
    Do you have energy saving options disabled? I heard that one can have problems with green drives. If they go to sleep, they can not reactivated or they disappear from Finder. It may depend on the SATA-card used... Did you experience something like that?
    I would upload it, if I had the possibility to. But what does a benchmark tell you, if daily tasks, real life tasks, are different from what the benchmark does when testing.
    I mean either way, in a G4, one will copy files on one disk or he will copy files from one disk to another, if it is about bigger files. He will do this on a) onboard ATA, b) SATA-PCI-card, c) via ethernet, d) Firewire. Since a + d make no sense, if you want to know something about a fast Drive and its transfer speeds, it leaves us with b + c.

    With small files you probably will not notice anything anyway, so a test which wants to test something that is perceivable to the human eye, will have bigger files involved (or a big number of small files, if you want to test access time).

    Yes, but I guess, that is what we do anyway, if we write a file, we must read and write it from somewhere at the same time. (Reading+writing on only one drive should be very slow, too. But the Benchmark-utility gets higher benchmarks, as if you do that with a small file on you own, manually).
    (Someone in another forum mailed me, he had an SATA-SSD in a Quicksilver and got 30-40MB, when copying a movie file on that same disk, not to another.)

    Since it would make no sense to read/write between ATA-Bus and SATA-PCI-Bus, I was argumenting testing it with two SATA-drives on the presumably faster PCI-Bus.
    I also have two SATA-PCI-cards, but since all PCI-buses share the total bandwidth, I guess I would not be better of, doing the test with, too SATA-cards. (I did, as far as I remember, but since there was no difference, I proceeded only with one card and different drives).

    Reorganizing my mind:

    presumption A: you will want to test something that is relevant to your everyday experience.
    presumption B: you will choose the fastest interface available for your test (which leaves us to SATA-PCI or Gigabit-ethernet, when using an ATA-Bus-PowerMac.)

    presumption C: there are three scenarios of using files.
    a) file read/written between two drives on same controller (e.g. 2xSATA-PCI-CARD, or - "or" in excluding meaning - ATA-Master and Slave.
    b) file read/written on one drive, from one part of its surface to a neighbouring part. (one drive!)
    c) file read/written between two drives, which are on separate BUSes. (e.g. from onboard ATA to SATA-PCI-Card)

    C-c) makes no sense, since it involves a known slow Bus
    if A and B then C-a or C-b with SATA-PCI-Card or Gigabit-ethernet.

    Letting PCI and Gigabit-ethernet out of sight, what now limits it, is the FSB involved, right? (Real question).

    What I admit:
    - what I elaborated above does not come into account, when just accessing files (like opening a folder). Either way you will not notice a difference or you will have an SSD (or a SATA-Drive hooked up via SATA-IDE adapter) and see, that e.g. browsing your folders has become quicker.

Share This Page